Literature DB >> 16501278

Medical students' self-reported experiences performing pelvic, breast, and male genital examinations and the influence of student gender and physician supervision.

Heidi S Powell1, Janis Bridge, Staci Eskesen, Franchesca Estrada, Mary Laya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To survey third- and fourth-year medical students about their experiences performing gender-specific examinations.
METHOD: In 2001, 402 third- and fourth-year medical students at the University of Washington School of Medicine were mailed a questionnaire that asked them to approximate the number of pelvic, breast, and male genital examinations they had performed and to estimate the percentage of these examinations that were observed and the percentage that were repeated by a supervising physician. They were also asked to rate their confidence performing these examinations. Chi-square analysis and stepwise multiple regression analysis were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 194 (48%) students completed the questionnaire. Fourth-year female students performed significantly more pelvic (p < .01) and breast examinations (p < .01) than did fourth-year male students. The percentage of examinations that were repeated by a supervising physician was low. Only 86 (45%) of third- and fourth-year students had greater than 75% of their breast examinations repeated by a supervising physician. Male students were less confident in performing the pelvic exam (p < .01) and female students were less confident performing the male genital exam (p < .01). The only predictor of confidence in performing each of these examinations was the number of examinations performed (p < .001). Confidence did not correlate with the percentage of exams observed, percentage of examinations repeated by a supervising physician, or student gender.
CONCLUSIONS: Student gender was a marker for suboptimal exposure for performing opposite-sex, gender-specific examinations. The only predictor of confidence in performing these examinations was the number of exams performed. Special efforts should be made to eliminate gender disparity in opportunities to perform gender-specific exams.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16501278     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  10 in total

1.  Missing the mark: Current practices in teaching the male urogenital examination to Canadian undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Kristen McAlpine; Stephen Steele
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination.

Authors:  Matthias Kiesel; Inga Beyers; Adam Kalisz; Achim Wöckel; Anne Quenzer; Tanja Schlaiß; Christine Wulff; Joachim Diessner
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2022-07-06

3.  Cancer prevention education in United States medical schools: how far have we come?

Authors:  Zeina Dajani; Alan C Geller
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Students' perception and experience of intimate area examination and sexual history taking during undergraduate clinical skills training: A study from two Saudi medical colleges.

Authors:  Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani; Shafiul Haque; Mohammad Irshad; Noor Al-Zahrani; Eman Al-Bedaie; Latifah Al-Fahad; Manar Al-Eid; Abdulrahman Al-Mohaimeed
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Teaching the Evaluation of Female Pelvic Pain: A Hands-On Simulation to Reinforce Exam Skills and Introduce Transvaginal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Jennifer Pearson; Amy Greminger; Emily Onello; Sandy Stover
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2021-01-25

6.  A 3D printed model of the female pelvis for practical education of gynecological pelvic examination.

Authors:  Matthias Kiesel; Inga Beyers; Adam Kalisz; Ralf Joukhadar; Achim Wöckel; Saskia-Laureen Herbert; Carolin Curtaz; Christine Wulff
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2022-05-05

7.  "Men's health--a little in the shadow": a formative evaluation of medical curriculum enhancement with men's health teaching and learning.

Authors:  Carol A Holden; Veronica R Collins; Christopher J Anderson; Sylvia Pomeroy; Richard Turner; Benedict J Canny; Bu B Yeap; Gary Wittert; Rob I McLachlan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Obstetrics and gynecology clerkship for males and females: similar curriculum, different outcomes?

Authors:  LaTasha B Craig; Chad Smith; Sheila M Crow; Whitney Driver; Michelle Wallace; Britta M Thompson
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2013-12-02

9.  Medical students' experiences learning intimate physical examination skills: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Andra M Dabson; Parker J Magin; Gaynor Heading; Dimity Pond
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Cost-effective analysis of teaching pelvic examination skills using Gynaecology Teaching Associates (GTAs) compared with manikin models (The CEAT Study).

Authors:  Aisha Janjua; Tracy Roberts; Nicola Okeahialam; T Justin Clark
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.