Literature DB >> 27873244

Mining Bacterial Genomes for Secondary Metabolite Gene Clusters.

Martina Adamek1,2, Marius Spohn1, Evi Stegmann1,2, Nadine Ziemert3,4.   

Abstract

With the emergence of bacterial resistance against frequently used antibiotics, novel antibacterial compounds are urgently needed. Traditional bioactivity-guided drug discovery strategies involve laborious screening efforts and display high rediscovery rates. With the progress in next generation sequencing methods and the knowledge that the majority of antibiotics in clinical use are produced as secondary metabolites by bacteria, mining bacterial genomes for secondary metabolites with antimicrobial activity is a promising approach, which can guide a more time and cost-effective identification of novel compounds. However, what sounds easy to accomplish, comes with several challenges. To date, several tools for the prediction of secondary metabolite gene clusters are available, some of which are based on the detection of signature genes, while others are searching for specific patterns in gene content or regulation.Apart from the mere identification of gene clusters, several other factors such as determining cluster boundaries and assessing the novelty of the detected cluster are important. For this purpose, comparison of the predicted secondary metabolite genes with different cluster and compound databases is necessary. Furthermore, it is advisable to classify detected clusters into gene cluster families. So far, there is no standardized procedure for genome mining; however, different approaches to overcome all of these challenges exist and are addressed in this chapter. We give practical guidance on the workflow for secondary metabolite gene cluster identification, which includes the determination of gene cluster boundaries, addresses problems occurring with the use of draft genomes, and gives an outlook on the different methods for gene cluster classification. Based on comprehensible examples a protocol is set, which should enable the readers to mine their own genome data for interesting secondary metabolites.

Keywords:  Antibiotics; Biosynthesis; Cluster boundaries; Gene cluster families; Genome mining; INBEKT; Prioritization; Secondary metabolite gene cluster; antiSMASH

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27873244     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6634-9_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  18 in total

1.  Computational structural enzymology methodologies for the study and engineering of fatty acid synthases, polyketide synthases and nonribosomal peptide synthetases.

Authors:  Andrew J Schaub; Gabriel O Moreno; Shiji Zhao; Hau V Truong; Ray Luo; Shiou-Chuan Tsai
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Great diversity of KSα sequences from bat-associated microbiota suggests novel sources of uncharacterized natural products.

Authors:  Paris S Salazar-Hamm; Jennifer J Marshall Hathaway; Ara S Winter; Nicole A Caimi; Debbie C Buecher; Ernest W Valdez; Diana E Northup
Journal:  FEMS Microbes       Date:  2022-04-18

3.  Genomic and Chemical Decryption of the Bacteroidetes Phylum for Its Potential to Biosynthesize Natural Products.

Authors:  Stephan Brinkmann; Michael Kurz; Maria A Patras; Christoph Hartwig; Michael Marner; Benedikt Leis; André Billion; Yolanda Kleiner; Armin Bauer; Luigi Toti; Christoph Pöverlein; Peter E Hammann; Andreas Vilcinskas; Jens Glaeser; Marius Spohn; Till F Schäberle
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-04-20

4.  Genome-based classification of micromonosporae with a focus on their biotechnological and ecological potential.

Authors:  Lorena Carro; Imen Nouioui; Vartul Sangal; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Martha E Trujillo; Maria Del Carmen Montero-Calasanz; Nevzat Sahin; Darren Lee Smith; Kristi E Kim; Paul Peluso; Shweta Deshpande; Tanja Woyke; Nicole Shapiro; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker; Michael Goodfellow
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparative Genomics and Biosynthetic Potential Analysis of Two Lichen-Isolated Amycolatopsis Strains.

Authors:  Marina Sánchez-Hidalgo; Ignacio González; Cristian Díaz-Muñoz; Germán Martínez; Olga Genilloud
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Screening and identification of novel biologically active natural compounds.

Authors:  David Newman
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-06-05

7.  Comparative genomics reveals phylogenetic distribution patterns of secondary metabolites in Amycolatopsis species.

Authors:  Martina Adamek; Mohammad Alanjary; Helena Sales-Ortells; Michael Goodfellow; Alan T Bull; Anika Winkler; Daniel Wibberg; Jörn Kalinowski; Nadine Ziemert
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Secondary Metabolism in the Gill Microbiota of Shipworms (Teredinidae) as Revealed by Comparison of Metagenomes and Nearly Complete Symbiont Genomes.

Authors:  Marvin A Altamia; Zhenjian Lin; Amaro E Trindade-Silva; Iris Diana Uy; J Reuben Shipway; Diego Veras Wilke; Gisela P Concepcion; Daniel L Distel; Eric W Schmidt; Margo G Haygood
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.496

9.  Comparative Genomics Analysis of Keratin-Degrading Chryseobacterium Species Reveals Their Keratinolytic Potential for Secondary Metabolite Production.

Authors:  Dingrong Kang; Saeed Shoaie; Samuel Jacquiod; Søren J Sørensen; Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-12

10.  A Novel Alkaliphilic Streptomyces Inhibits ESKAPE Pathogens.

Authors:  Luciana Terra; Paul J Dyson; Matthew D Hitchings; Liam Thomas; Alyaa Abdelhameed; Ibrahim M Banat; Salvatore A Gazze; Dušica Vujaklija; Paul D Facey; Lewis W Francis; Gerry A Quinn
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.