Ilaria Guella1, Linda Huh1, Marna B McKenzie1, Eric B Toyota1, E Martina Bebin1, Michelle L Thompson1, Gregory M Cooper1, Daniel M Evans1, Sarah E Buerki1, Shelin Adam1, Margot I Van Allen1, Tanya N Nelson1, Mary B Connolly1, Matthew J Farrer1, Michelle Demos1. 1. Centre for Applied Neurogenetics (CAN), Department of Medical Genetics (I.G., M.B.M., D.M.E., M.J.F.), Division of Neurology (L.H., E.B.T., S.E.B., M.B.C., M.D.), Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia and BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neurology (E.M.B.), University of Alabama at Birmingham; HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology (M.L.T., G.M.C.), Huntsville, AL; Department of Medical Genetics (S.A., M.I.V.A.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; and Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (T.N.N.), University of British Columbia and BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We describe 2 additional patients with early-onset epilepsy with a de novo FGF12 mutation. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing was performed in 2 unrelated patients with early-onset epilepsy and their unaffected parents. Genetic variants were assessed by comparative trio analysis. Clinical evolution, EEG, and neuroimaging are described. The phenotype and response to treatment was reviewed and compared to affected siblings in the original report. RESULTS: We identified the same FGF12 de novo mutation reported previously (c.G155A, p.R52H) in 2 additional patients with early-onset epilepsy. Similar to the original brothers described, both presented with tonic seizures in the first month of life. In the first patient, seizures responded to sodium channel blockers and her development was normal at 11 months. Patient 2 is a 15-year-old girl with treatment-resistant focal epilepsy, moderate intellectual disability, and autism. Carbamazepine (sodium channel blocker) was tried later in her course but not continued due to an allergic reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of a recurrent de novo mutation in 2 additional unrelated probands with early-onset epilepsy supports the role of FGF12 p.R52H in disease pathogenesis. Affected carriers presented with similar early clinical phenotypes; however, this report expands the phenotype associated with this mutation which contrasts with the progressive course and early mortality of the siblings in the original report.
OBJECTIVE: We describe 2 additional patients with early-onset epilepsy with a de novo FGF12 mutation. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing was performed in 2 unrelated patients with early-onset epilepsy and their unaffected parents. Genetic variants were assessed by comparative trio analysis. Clinical evolution, EEG, and neuroimaging are described. The phenotype and response to treatment was reviewed and compared to affected siblings in the original report. RESULTS: We identified the same FGF12 de novo mutation reported previously (c.G155A, p.R52H) in 2 additional patients with early-onset epilepsy. Similar to the original brothers described, both presented with tonic seizures in the first month of life. In the first patient, seizures responded to sodium channel blockers and her development was normal at 11 months. Patient 2 is a 15-year-old girl with treatment-resistant focal epilepsy, moderate intellectual disability, and autism. Carbamazepine (sodium channel blocker) was tried later in her course but not continued due to an allergic reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of a recurrent de novo mutation in 2 additional unrelated probands with early-onset epilepsy supports the role of FGF12 p.R52H in disease pathogenesis. Affected carriers presented with similar early clinical phenotypes; however, this report expands the phenotype associated with this mutation which contrasts with the progressive course and early mortality of the siblings in the original report.
High-throughput sequencing technology, including whole-exome sequencing (WES), has revolutionized gene discovery in epilepsy. It has also demonstrated the significant genetic heterogeneity of epilepsy and the importance of de novo mutations in the epilepticencephalopathies,[1] which are the most severe forms of epilepsy. Recently, WES in a family quintet with 2 affected siblings with early-onset epilepticencephalopathy (EOEE) and cerebellar atrophy identified fibroblast growth factor 12 (FGF12, also known as FHF1) as a putative gene responsible.[2] A de novo gain-of-function variant (p.R52H) was found in 2 affected siblings with lethal disease. FGF12 encodes a cytosolic protein that interacts with neuronal sodium channels and increases their voltage-dependent fast inactivation.[3] Here, we performed WES-trio analysis and identified the same de novo missense mutation in 2 patients with severe neonatal-onset epilepsy and variable clinical outcomes.
METHODS
Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents.
This study was approved by site-specific Institutional Review Boards, and informed consent was obtained from all individuals.
Genetic analysis.
Peripheral blood samples were collected from the proband and her parents. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes following standard protocols. Patient 1 exonic regions were captured using the Ion AmpliSeq Exome Kit (57.7 Mb), and WES was performed on the Ion Proton System according to manufacturers' recommendations (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Candidate variants were validated by Sanger sequencing as previously described.[4] Primer sequences and PCR conditions are available on request. Patient 2 was identified through GeneMatcher (genematcher.org/).[5] WES and data analysis were performed as part of a trio-based clinical sequencing study at HudsonAlpha. Exome capture was completed using Nimblegen SeqCap EZ Exome v3 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), and sequencing was conducted on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Sanger confirmation of variants, including confirmation of absence from both biological parents, was performed by a College of American Pathologists/Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–certified or Diagnostic Accreditation Program–accredited diagnostic laboratory.
RESULTS
Family trio analysis identified the same FGF12 missense mutation in both patients, identical to the variant reported previously.[2] The mutation is a de novo heterozygous G>A transition at position 155 of the complementary DNA (NM_004113) which results in a p.R52H missense substitution. Sanger sequencing was performed in both trios and confirmed that the mutation was only present in the affected probands. No other pathogenic mutations in known epilepsy genes were present.
Clinical phenotypes.
Patient 1 is a developmentally normal 11-month-old baby, born at term after an uncomplicated pregnancy. She presented on day 3 of life with a 2-minute seizure involving extension of all limbs, head, and eye deviation to the right side and apnea with desaturation. On day 3, the interictal EEG showed multifocal spikes. During continuous video-EEG monitoring on day 8, multiple independent left and right frontal seizures were recorded. Seizures occurred from sleep, and 1 typical seizure with corresponding EEG is shown in the video at Neurology.org/ng and in the figure. Seizures continued despite treatment with phenobarbital, levetiracetam, topiramate, and a midazolam infusion. She required intubation and ventilation for 3 days. Her seizures stopped on day 20 of age after the addition of phenytoin. She had 1–3 seizures per month on phenytoin and topiramate. Carbamazepine was added to topiramate at 6 weeks of age, and she has been seizure free since 5 months of age on carbamazepine (30 mg/kg/d). Her initial neurologic examination showed mild hypotonia which later resolved. Her development remains normal. Her head circumference remains at the 85th percentile, and her EEG performed at 10 months of age was normal. Extensive neurometabolic investigations and a head MRI performed at day 4 of life were unremarkable.
Figure
Patient 1: Ictal EEG
Seizure began with arousal from sleep and extension of all 4 limbs followed by clonic jerking of the right arm and bradycardia (see video). Ictal EEG demonstrated (A) generalized attenuation of EEG activity at seizure onset, followed by rhythmic spikes in left central area; (B) spread to right central area; (C) spread to bilateral central frontal parietal regions; and (D) postictal suppression.
Patient 1: Ictal EEG
Seizure began with arousal from sleep and extension of all 4 limbs followed by clonic jerking of the right arm and bradycardia (see video). Ictal EEG demonstrated (A) generalized attenuation of EEG activity at seizure onset, followed by rhythmic spikes in left central area; (B) spread to right central area; (C) spread to bilateral central frontal parietal regions; and (D) postictal suppression.Patient 2 is a 15-year-old girl, born at term following an uncomplicated pregnancy and delivery. She presented on day 2 of life with tonic seizures characterized by generalized stiffening which evolved to intermittent stiffening and twitching of the limbs. On day 11, her EEG demonstrated suppression of the background and multifocal spikes. Seizures did not respond to phenobarbital, clonazepam, topiramate, and lamotrigine. At 4 years of age, she developed focal seizures with impaired awareness which could evolve to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. The interictal EEG showed mild background slowing and left frontotemporal spikes. Carbamazepine was tried at 4 years of age; however, it was stopped immediately following an allergic reaction. Rufinamide was added to lamotrigine at the age of 8 years and at most recent follow-up, the patient has been seizure free for 1 year. Developmental delay was noted by 1 year of age, and her development regressed at times of increased seizure frequency. She currently has moderate intellectual disability and autism. MRI of the brain at 2 weeks and 2 years of age was normal except for an incidental Chiari I malformation.
DISCUSSION
In this report, we describe 2 additional patients with a de novo p.R52H mutation in FGF12 but with milder phenotypes. The same variant observed in our patients was recently described in 2 siblings with a lethal disorder characterized by EOEE and cerebellar atrophy.[2] All 4 affected individuals presented with early-onset tonic seizures and most had seizures from sleep (table). Patient 1 does not have an epilepticencephalopathy given the cessation of seizures, normal development, and normal EEG. However, patient 2 and the original reported clinical features of the siblings[2] are consistent with an epilepticencephalopathy. In all cases, seizures were refractory to multiple antiseizure medications. However, patient 1 had a good response to sodium channel blockers and has been seizure free since 5 months of age. In patient 2, carbamazepine resulted in an allergic reaction and phenytoin was not tried. Patient 2 is currently seizure free on a combination of lamotrigine and rufinamide, which is possibly due to the effects of these drugs on the sodium channel. The current neurologic examination and development are normal for patient 1. This contrasts with the report of the siblings, which indicates a neurodegenerative course associated with early death. The clinical course of patient 2 also is not as severe as that of the siblings; however, her seizures were refractory to treatment except for the past year, and she did have developmental regression associated with increased seizure activity. She also has intellectual disability and autism. In the original report,[2] progressive cerebellar atrophy was also a prominent feature of the disease phenotype which differs from the normal MRI seen in patient 1 and the incidental Chiari I malformation identified on MRI in patient 2. It is difficult to accurately compare MRI findings given the young age of patient 1; however, MRI of patient 2 showed no sign of cerebellar atrophy at age 2. The milder phenotype with normal clinical outcome seen in patient 1 may be influenced by the early seizure control. However, other genetic and/or environmental factors may also be playing a role. Although the young age of patient 1 limits a clear impression of the natural history of this disorder, there is a striking clinical difference between patient 1 normal clinical course to date and moderate to severe course of patient 2 and the lethal outcome of the previously described siblings. Early seizure control in patient 1 suggests possible important treatment implications for this genetic disorder which could affect outcome.
Table
Clinical features of patients with de novo p.R52H FGF12 mutation
Clinical features of patients with de novo p.R52H FGF12 mutationDuring the preparation of this manuscript, we became aware of 3 additional patients with an epilepticencephalopathy carrying the same FGF12 de novo mutation.[6] The identification of a recurrent de novo mutation in 6 unrelated patients all presenting with early-onset epilepsy strongly supports the involvement of FGF12 in disease pathogenesis.[7,8] Moreover, the identification of additional patients carrying the same FGF12 variant broadens the phenotypic spectrum associated with this gene.
Authors: Aleksandra Siekierska; Mala Isrie; Yue Liu; Chloë Scheldeman; Niels Vanthillo; Lieven Lagae; Peter A M de Witte; Hilde Van Esch; Mitchell Goldfarb; Gunnar M Buyse Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: John C Steele; Ilaria Guella; Chelsea Szu-Tu; Michelle K Lin; Christina Thompson; Daniel M Evans; Holly E Sherman; Carles Vilariño-Güell; Katrina Gwinn; Huw Morris; Dennis W Dickson; Matthew J Farrer Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm Journal: Genet Med Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: D G MacArthur; T A Manolio; D P Dimmock; H L Rehm; J Shendure; G R Abecasis; D R Adams; R B Altman; S E Antonarakis; E A Ashley; J C Barrett; L G Biesecker; D F Conrad; G M Cooper; N J Cox; M J Daly; M B Gerstein; D B Goldstein; J N Hirschhorn; S M Leal; L A Pennacchio; J A Stamatoyannopoulos; S R Sunyaev; D Valle; B F Voight; W Winckler; C Gunter Journal: Nature Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sameer Al-Mehmadi; Miranda Splitt; Venkateswaran Ramesh; Suzanne DeBrosse; Kimberly Dessoffy; Fan Xia; Yaping Yang; Jill A Rosenfeld; Patrick Cossette; Jacques L Michaud; Fadi F Hamdan; Philippe M Campeau; Berge A Minassian Journal: Neurol Genet Date: 2016-10-28
Authors: Andrew S Allen; Samuel F Berkovic; Patrick Cossette; Norman Delanty; Dennis Dlugos; Evan E Eichler; Michael P Epstein; Tracy Glauser; David B Goldstein; Yujun Han; Erin L Heinzen; Yuki Hitomi; Katherine B Howell; Michael R Johnson; Ruben Kuzniecky; Daniel H Lowenstein; Yi-Fan Lu; Maura R Z Madou; Anthony G Marson; Heather C Mefford; Sahar Esmaeeli Nieh; Terence J O'Brien; Ruth Ottman; Slavé Petrovski; Annapurna Poduri; Elizabeth K Ruzzo; Ingrid E Scheffer; Elliott H Sherr; Christopher J Yuskaitis; Bassel Abou-Khalil; Brian K Alldredge; Jocelyn F Bautista; Samuel F Berkovic; Alex Boro; Gregory D Cascino; Damian Consalvo; Patricia Crumrine; Orrin Devinsky; Dennis Dlugos; Michael P Epstein; Miguel Fiol; Nathan B Fountain; Jacqueline French; Daniel Friedman; Eric B Geller; Tracy Glauser; Simon Glynn; Sheryl R Haut; Jean Hayward; Sandra L Helmers; Sucheta Joshi; Andres Kanner; Heidi E Kirsch; Robert C Knowlton; Eric H Kossoff; Rachel Kuperman; Ruben Kuzniecky; Daniel H Lowenstein; Shannon M McGuire; Paul V Motika; Edward J Novotny; Ruth Ottman; Juliann M Paolicchi; Jack M Parent; Kristen Park; Annapurna Poduri; Ingrid E Scheffer; Renée A Shellhaas; Elliott H Sherr; Jerry J Shih; Rani Singh; Joseph Sirven; Michael C Smith; Joseph Sullivan; Liu Lin Thio; Anu Venkat; Eileen P G Vining; Gretchen K Von Allmen; Judith L Weisenberg; Peter Widdess-Walsh; Melodie R Winawer Journal: Nature Date: 2013-08-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: S M Hiatt; M D Amaral; K M Bowling; C R Finnila; M L Thompson; D E Gray; J M J Lawlor; J N Cochran; E M Bebin; K B Brothers; K M East; W V Kelley; N E Lamb; S E Levy; E J Lose; M B Neu; C A Rich; S Simmons; R M Myers; G S Barsh; G M Cooper Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: Marina Trivisano; Alessandro Ferretti; Elizabeth Bebin; Linda Huh; Gaetan Lesca; Aleksandra Siekierska; Ryo Takeguchi; Maryline Carneiro; Luca De Palma; Ilaria Guella; Kazuhiro Haginoya; Ruo Ming Shi; Atsuo Kikuchi; Tomoko Kobayashi; Julien Jung; Lieven Lagae; Mathieu Milh; Marie L Mathieu; Berge A Minassian; Antonio Novelli; Nicola Pietrafusa; Eri Takeshita; Marco Tartaglia; Alessandra Terracciano; Michelle L Thompson; Gregory M Cooper; Federico Vigevano; Laurent Villard; Nathalie Villeneuve; Gunnar M Buyse; Michelle Demos; Ingrid E Scheffer; Nicola Specchio Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Hadley Stevens Smith; J Michael Swint; Seema R Lalani; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Marcia C de Oliveira Otto; Stephan Castellanos; Amy Taylor; Brendan H Lee; Heidi V Russell Journal: Genet Med Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 8.822