Literature DB >> 27871829

The Role of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men With Unilateral Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy.

Darren J Bryk1, Elton Llukani1, Samir S Taneja1, Andrew B Rosenkrantz2, William C Huang1, Herbert Lepor3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine how ipsilateral (ipsi) and contralateral (contra) systematic biopsies (SB) impact detection of clinically significant vs insignificant prostate cancer (PCa) in men with unilateral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion undergoing MRI-ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy (MRF-TB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 211 cases with 1 unilateral MRI lesion were subjected to SB and MRF-TB. Biopsy tissue cores from the MRF-TB, ipsi-SB, and contra-SB were analyzed separately.
RESULTS: A direct relationship was observed between MRI suspicion score and (1) detection of any cancer, (2) Gleason 6 PCa, and (3) Gleason >6 PCa. MRF-TB alone, MRF-TB + ipsi-SB, and MRF-TB + contra-SB detected 64.1%, 89.1%, and 76.1% of all PCa, respectively; 53.5%, 81.4%, and 69.8% of Gleason 6 PCa, respectively; and 73.5%, 96.0%, and 81.6% of Gleason >6 PCa, respectively. MRF-TB + ipsi-SB detected 96% of clinically significant PCa and avoided detection of 18.6% of clinically insignificant PCa. MRF-TB + contra-SB detected 81.6% of clinically significant PCa and avoided detection of 30.2% of clinically insignificant PCa.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that ipsi-SB should be added to MRF-TB, as detection of clinically significant PCa increases with only a modest increase in clinically insignificant PCa detection. Contra-SB in this setting may be deferred because it primarily detects clinically insignificant PCa.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27871829     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

Review 1.  PI-RADS Steering Committee: The PI-RADS Multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed Biopsy Pathway.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Jelle Barentsz; Geert Villeirs; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Daniel J Margolis; Baris Turkbey; Harriet C Thoeny; François Cornud; Masoom A Haider; Katarzyna J Macura; Clare M Tempany; Sadhna Verma; Jeffrey C Weinreb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Frank-Jan H Drost; Daniël F Osses; Daan Nieboer; Ewout W Steyerberg; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol; Ivo G Schoots
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-25

3.  MRI-targeted biopsy cores from prostate index lesions: assessment and prediction of the number needed.

Authors:  Nick Lasse Beetz; Franziska Dräger; Charlie Alexander Hamm; Seyd Shnayien; Madhuri Monique Rudolph; Konrad Froböse; Sefer Elezkurtaj; Matthias Haas; Patrick Asbach; Bernd Hamm; Samy Mahjoub; Frank Konietschke; Maximilian Wechsung; Felix Balzer; Hannes Cash; Sebastian Hofbauer; Tobias Penzkofer
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 5.455

4.  In-Bore MRI-guided Prostate Biopsies: Retrospective Observational Study of Complementary Nontargeted Sampling of Normal-appearing Areas at Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Kareem K Elfatairy; Christopher P Filson; Martin G Sanda; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Sherif G Nour
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 5.  The current role of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Olivier Rouviere; Paul Cezar Moldovan
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-12-11

Review 6.  Diagnostic Performance of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Targeted plus Regional Biopsy Approach in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marinus J Hagens; Mar Fernandez Salamanca; Anwar R Padhani; Pim J van Leeuwen; Henk G van der Poel; Ivo G Schoots
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 7.  Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Ottavio de Cobelli; Gennaro Musi; Francesco Del Giudice; Giuseppe Carrieri; Gian Maria Busetto; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Alessandro Sciarra; Martina Maggi; Felice Crocetto; Biagio Barone; Vincenzo Francesco Caputo; Michele Marchioni; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Ciro Imbimbo; Francesco Alessandro Mistretta; Stefano Luzzago; Mihai Dorin Vartolomei; Luigi Cormio; Riccardo Autorino; Octavian Sabin Tătaru
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-07-04

8.  An optimized prostate biopsy strategy in patients with a unilateral lesion on prostate magnetic resonance imaging avoids unnecessary biopsies.

Authors:  Auke Jager; Luigi A M J G van Riel; Arnoud W Postema; Theo M de Reijke; Tim M van der Sluis; Jorg R Oddens
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-07-26

9.  Axumin (18F-Fluciclovine) PET imaging in men exhibiting no clinically significant cancer on initial negative biopsy of PI-RADS 4 and 5 regions of interest.

Authors:  Ezequiel Becher; Shawn Karls; Angela Tong; James S Wysock; Samir S Taneja; William C Huang; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection with various prostate sampling schemes based on different csPCa definitions.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Tong Chen; Meng Wang; Hanbing Chen; Caishan Wang; Peiqing Liu; Songtao Liu; Jing Luo; Qi Ma; Lijun Xu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.264

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.