Literature DB >> 27869590

Detection and Genotyping of Coxiella burnetii in Pigs, South Korea, 2014-2015.

Min-Goo Seo, In-Ohk Ouh, Seung-Hun Lee, Dongmi Kwak.   

Abstract

We assessed Coxiella burnetii prevalence and genotypes in pigs in South Korea during 2014-2015. Prevalence was low among 1,030 samples tested by ELISA and immunofluorescent assay and 1,124 samples tested by PCR. Despite this finding, possible transmission of C. burnetii from pigs to humans cannot be excluded.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coxiella burnetii; Q fever; South Korea; bacteria; blood; detection; epidemiology; genotyping; humans; phylogeny; pigs; potential reservoir; prevalence; serologic testing; tissue; transmission; zoonoses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27869590      PMCID: PMC5189167          DOI: 10.3201/eid2212.161236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Q fever is a zoonotic disease caused by the extremely infectious bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Humans can be infected by inhalation of infectious aerosols or contaminated dust from infected ruminants or through contact with infected animal products. Ruminants are known as the primary reservoirs for the bacterium. Wildlife may also serve as reservoirs (). However, epidemiologic data on the occurrence of C. burnetii in pigs are limited. Their susceptibility to C. burnetii infection has been confirmed by the presence of serum antibodies (), but strong evidence for pigs serving as reservoirs of C. burnetii is lacking. In addition, transmission of C. burnetii from pigs to humans has not been confirmed. In the veterinary field, commercial immunologic methods are the easiest to interpret and are used at the herd level to detect C. burnetii infection or exposure within a population of animals (). In South Korea, there have been several studies on C. burnetii in ruminants (,), but studies evaluating C. burnetii in pigs are lacking. As first step toward understanding the epidemiology of C. burnetii in pigs, we evaluated the prevalence and genotypes of this bacterium in pigs reared in Gyeongsang Province, South Korea.

The Study

During 2015 in South Korea, a total of 10,332,000 pigs were raised, of which 2,338,521 (22.6%) were raised on 1,134 farms in Gyeongsang Province (). For this study, we collected 1,030 blood and 97 tissue samples from pigs (645 breeding and 479 fattening pigs) reared on 209 pig farms in Gyeongsang Province during 2014–2015. Sample size was determined using a formula with an expected disease prevalence of 50%, accepted absolute er­ror of 5%, and CI of 99% in a simple random sampling design (Technical Appendix); a minimum of 664 samples were required. Samples were collected by practicing veterinarians during treatment or regular medical checkups; ethical approval was not required. The number of samplings was based on the number of pigs and farms within each of the Province’s administrative districts (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Number of pig farms in the provincial administrative districts and number of farms on which pigs were sampled for the detection and genotyping of Coxiella burnetii, Gyeongsang Province, South Korea, 2014–2015. The number of samplings was based on the number of pigs and farms within each of the province’s administrative districts.

Number of pig farms in the provincial administrative districts and number of farms on which pigs were sampled for the detection and genotyping of Coxiella burnetii, Gyeongsang Province, South Korea, 2014–2015. The number of samplings was based on the number of pigs and farms within each of the province’s administrative districts. Whole blood was used for PCR; the serum was separated for serologic testing. Lung, lymph node, liver, spleen, and kidney samples were collected for differential diagnosis of diseases in pigs that aborted or had a stillbirth, respiratory symptoms, or weakness. To detect C. burnetii–positive samples, we used 2 different assays and nested PCR. We used an indirect multispecies ELISA (ID Screen Q Fever Indirect Multi-species Kit; IDvet, Montpellier, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to detect C. burnetii antibodies in samples; a sample optical density to positive-control optical density value of >50% was considered positive. We also performed an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), using the Coxiella burnetii (Q Fever) FA Substrate Slide (VMRD, Pullman, WA, USA), as recommended by the manufacturer; titers >64 to phase-1 or phase-2 antigens were considered seropositive. We used the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to extract DNA from whole blood and tissue samples. The Coxiella 16S rRNA gene in extracted DNA was then amplified using nested PCR and sequencing primers (Technical Appendix). We sequenced amplification products with Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea) and analyzed results using sequence alignment programs and statistical methods (Technical Appendix). Of the 1,030 sampled pigs, 70 (6.8%) were positive for C. burnetii by ELISA (Table); these pigs were from 32 (15.3%) of the 209 sampled farms. Two of the 32 farms had 8 positive pigs each; the other 30 had 1–3 positive pigs each. Fifty-three (5.2%) sampled pigs had samples identified as phase-1 or phase-2 antigen seropositive by IFA; these samples were also seropositive by ELISA. An additional 17 samples seropositive by ELISA were seronegative by IFA. C. burnetii seroprevalence was significantly higher (p<0.0001) in breeding than in fattening pigs by ELISA and IFA.
Table

Assay determinations of Coxiella burnetii prevalence among different types of pigs reared in Gyeongsang Province, South Korea, 2014–2015

AssayNo. positive pigs/no. total*% Pigs positive (95% CI)
ELISA
Breeding pigs
Farms 29/101 28.7 (19.9–37.5)
Pigs 66/637 10.4 (8.0–12.7)
Fattening pigs
Farms3/1082.8 (0–5.9)
Pigs4/3931.0 (0.1–2.0)
Subtotal
Farms32/20915.3 (10.4–20.2)
Pigs
70/1,030
6.8 (5.3–8.3)
IFA
Breeding pigs
Phase-1 antigens 46/637 7.2 (5.2–9.2)
Phase-2 antigens 48/637 7.5 (5.5–9.6)
Phase-1 or -2 antigens 49/637 7.7 (5.6–9.8)
Fattening pigs
Phase-1 antigens4/3931.0 (0–2.0)
Phase-2 antigens4/3931.0 (0–2.0)
Phase-1 or -2 antigens4/3931.0 (0.1–2.0)
Subtotal
Phase-1 antigens50/1,0304.9 (3.5–6.2)
Phase-2 antigens52/1,0305.0 (3.7–6.4)
Phase-1 or -2 antigens
53/1,030
5.2 (3.8–6.5)
PCR
Breed type
Breeding pigs3/6450.5 (0–1.0)
Fattening pigs0/4790
Sample type
Blood2/1,0300.2 (0–0.5)
Tissue1/941.1 (0–3.1)
Subtotal3/1,1240.3 (0–0.6)

*Bold indicates significantly different (p<0.05) compared with fattening pigs.

*Bold indicates significantly different (p<0.05) compared with fattening pigs. ELISA and IFA results were in agreement for 1,013 (98.4%) of the 1,030 samples; 53 (5.2%) samples were positive, and 960 (93.2%) were negative. The Cohen κ coefficient was 0.85 (i.e., very good agreement; 95% CI 0.79–0.92). Three (0.3%) pigs were positive for C. burnetii by PCR; all were breeding pigs and seronegative for C. burnetii. One positive sample was lung tissue from a pig that appeared to have respiratory signs; other respiratory pathogens were also detected in the sample. Acute C. burnetii infection with organ involvement was confirmed by PCR. However, the infection status of seropositive pigs cannot be determined on the basis of a single titer. C. burnetii–seronegative pigs can, however, shed the organism and, thus, might serve as a reservoir for transmission of the bacterium to humans. 16S rRNA gene sequences for the 3 C. burnetii PCR-positive samples (GenBank accession nos. KT945014–16; Figure 2) showed 100% identity with each other; nucleotide sequences showed high (96.6%–96.9%) identity with those of other C. burnetii strains. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the 3 isolates belong to clade A, clustering with previously published C. burnetii sequences (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree constructed using the maximum-likelihood method from Coxiella burnetii 16S rRNA sequences. Arrows indicate C. burnetii sequences from study to detect and genotype C. burnetii in pigs in Gyeongsang Province, South Korea, 2014–2015. Rounded rectangle indicates C. burnetii group. The 4 Coxiella clades (A–D) are indicated at right. GenBank accession numbers for other sequences are shown in parentheses. Numbers on branches indicate bootstrap support (1,000 replicates). Scale bar represents the evolutionary distance between sequences. CLB, Coxiella-like bacteria.

Phylogenetic tree constructed using the maximum-likelihood method from Coxiella burnetii 16S rRNA sequences. Arrows indicate C. burnetii sequences from study to detect and genotype C. burnetii in pigs in Gyeongsang Province, South Korea, 2014–2015. Rounded rectangle indicates C. burnetii group. The 4 Coxiella clades (A–D) are indicated at right. GenBank accession numbers for other sequences are shown in parentheses. Numbers on branches indicate bootstrap support (1,000 replicates). Scale bar represents the evolutionary distance between sequences. CLB, Coxiella-like bacteria.

Conclusions

We found that 6.8%, 5.2%, and 0.3% of tested pig samples in Gyeongsang Province were positive for C. burnetii by ELISA, IFA, and PCR, respectively. These rates of seropositivity are relatively low compared with the rate found in a study in Uruguay, in which 18.4% (83/479) of the blood samples were seropositive by layer microagglutination (). In that study, the innate susceptibility of pigs to C. burnetii was confirmed during a Q fever epidemic. Seropositivity in our study was, however, higher than that reported in blood tested by IFA in Japan (0/396 samples) () and by complement fixation in Bulgaria (0.05%; 1/1,809 samples) (). In C. burnetii–positive animals, bacterial burden is highest in birth products. We did not test such tissues; however, the positivity rate in our study was similar to that (0/16) in a previous examination of pig placentas by real-time PCR in the Netherlands (). In our study, the PCR-positive pig samples did not test positive by serologic methods. Similar to results from a previous study (), our results showed that IFA was less sensitive than ELISA at detecting C. burnetii in serum. However, serologic diagnosis of coxiellosis in animals is complicated. Animals can maintain seropositivity after acute infection has cleared, and they can seroconvert without shedding (); thus, serologic methods are not useful for determining which animals currently pose a risk for transmission. In our study, seroprevalence among breeding pigs was significantly high (p<0.05). In addition, only breeding pigs were positive for C. burnetii by PCR. Because of pregnancy stress, breeding pigs probably experienced a recrudescent infection, making them more likely to shed the organism. A study on the epidemiology of Q fever suggested that breeding pigs can cause infection in humans (). The genus Coxiella is divided into 4 highly divergent genetic clades (A–D); C. burnetii belongs to clade A (). Phylogenetic analysis showed that the 3 C. burnetii isolates in our study were closely related to clade A strains from the United States, Japan, and Greenland, indicating a close epidemiologic link. Although the number of C. burnetii–positive pigs was low in our study, a previous study identified contact with pigs as a risk factor for C. burnetii seropositivity in humans (). Therefore, pigs may serve as potential reservoirs for C. burnetii. However, several questions remain unanswered regarding the epidemiology of C. burnetii infection in pigs and possible transmission to humans. Additional investigations of the infection prevalence in other animals are necessary to understand the epidemiology of C. burnetii.

Technical Appendix

Methodology used in study of Coxiella burnetii in pigs in South Korea.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Q fever.

Authors:  Jennifer H McQuiston; James E Childs; Herbert A Thompson
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 1.936

2.  The epidemiology of Q fever in Great Britain; an analysis of the findings and some conclusions.

Authors:  B P MARMION; M G STOKER
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1958-10-04

3.  An explosive outbreak of Q fever.

Authors:  M G P STOKER; J F THOMPSON
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1953-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Seroepidemiology of Coxiella burnetii in domestic and companion animals in Japan.

Authors:  K K Htwe; K Amano; Y Sugiyama; K Yagami; N Minamoto; A Hashimoto; T Yamaguchi; H Fukushi; K Hirai
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1992-11-21       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Seroepidemiologic and occupational risk survey for Coxiella burnetii antibodies among US veterinarians.

Authors:  Ellen A S Whitney; Robert F Massung; Amanda J Candee; Elizabeth C Ailes; Lee M Myers; Nicole E Patterson; Ruth L Berkelman
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Molecular and serologic detection of Coxiella burnetii in native Korean goats (Capra hircus coreanae).

Authors:  Byeong Yeal Jung; Min-Goo Seo; Seung-Hun Lee; Jae-Won Byun; Jae-Ku Oem; Dongmi Kwak
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Q fever in humans and animals in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer H McQuiston; James E Childs
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.133

8.  Coxiella burnetii shedding by dairy cows.

Authors:  Raphaël Guatteo; François Beaudeau; Alain Joly; Henri Seegers
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.683

9.  The Recent Evolution of a Maternally-Inherited Endosymbiont of Ticks Led to the Emergence of the Q Fever Pathogen, Coxiella burnetii.

Authors:  Olivier Duron; Valérie Noël; Karen D McCoy; Matteo Bonazzi; Karim Sidi-Boumedine; Olivier Morel; Fabrice Vavre; Lionel Zenner; Elsa Jourdain; Patrick Durand; Céline Arnathau; François Renaud; Jean-François Trape; Abel S Biguezoton; Julie Cremaschi; Muriel Dietrich; Elsa Léger; Anaïs Appelgren; Marlène Dupraz; Elena Gómez-Díaz; Georges Diatta; Guiguigbaza-Kossigan Dayo; Hassane Adakal; Sébastien Zoungrana; Laurence Vial; Christine Chevillon
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Search for possible additional reservoirs for human Q fever, The Netherlands.

Authors:  Hendrik I J Roest; Conny B van Solt; Jeroen J H C Tilburg; Corné H W Klaassen; Emiel K Hovius; Frank T F Roest; Piet Vellema; René van den Brom; Fred G van Zijderveld
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  7 in total

1.  Herd prevalence and genotypes of Coxiella burnetii in dairy cattle bulk tank milk in Gyeongsang provinces of South Korea.

Authors:  Min-Goo Seo; In-Ohk Ouh; Dongmi Kwak
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Detection of Coxiella burnetii DNA and anti-Coxiella burnetii IgG antibodies in precolostral blood samples of stillborn calves in an endemically infected Holstein dairy herd.

Authors:  Markus Freick; Andrea Konrath; Haimo Enbergs; Jörg Walraph; Jim Weber; Karin Eulenberger
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii in cattle at South Korean national breeding stock farms.

Authors:  Min-Goo Seo; In-Ohk Ouh; Seung-Hun Lee; Jong Wan Kim; Man Hee Rhee; Oh-Deog Kwon; Tae-Hwan Kim; Dongmi Kwak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Isolation of Coxiella burnetii in patients with nonspecific febrile illness in South Korea.

Authors:  Seung Hun Lee; Jae Hoon Lee; Sungdo Park; Hae Kyung Lee; Seon Do Hwang; Hye Won Jeong; Jung Yeon Heo; Yeong Seon Lee
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Molecular Detection of Coxiella burnetii in Cattle on Ulleung Island, Korea: A Population-based Study with Four Years of Follow Up.

Authors:  Min-Goo Seo; Oh-Deog Kwon; Dongmi Kwak
Journal:  Korean J Parasitol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.341

6.  Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii in pig-hunting dogs from north Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  B Orr; R Malik; M E Westman; J M Norris
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 1.343

7.  Molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of tick-borne pathogens in wild Korean water deer and farmed elk in Gyeongbuk and Gangwon Provinces of Korea.

Authors:  Minkyo Lee; Min-Goo Seo; Seung-Hun Lee; In-Ohk Ouh; Young-Hoan Kim; Joong-Kew Kim; Youn-Kyoung Goo; Man-Hee Rhee; Tae-Hwan Kim; Oh-Deog Kwon; Dongmi Kwak
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 1.267

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.