Literature DB >> 17903418

Coxiella burnetii shedding by dairy cows.

Raphaël Guatteo1, François Beaudeau, Alain Joly, Henri Seegers.   

Abstract

While shedding routes of Coxiella burnetii are identified, the characteristics of Coxiella shedding are still widely unknown, especially in dairy cattle. However, this information is crucial to assess the natural course of Coxiella burnetii infection within a herd and then to elaborate strategies to limit the risks of transmission between animals and to humans. The present study aimed at (i) describing the characteristics of Coxiella burnetii shedding by dairy cows (in milk, vaginal mucus, faeces) in five infected dairy herds, and at (ii) investigating the possible relationships between shedding patterns and serological responses. A total of 145 cows were included in a follow-up consisting of seven concomitant samplings of milk, vaginal mucus, faeces and blood (Day 0, D7, D14, D21, D28, D63, D90). Detection and quantification of Coxiella burnetii titres were performed in milk, vaginal mucus and faeces samples using real-time PCR assay, while antibodies against Coxiella were detected using an ELISA technique. For a given shedding route, and a given periodicity (weekly or monthly), cows were gathered into different shedding kinetic patterns according to the sequence of PCR responses. Distribution of estimated titres in Coxiella burnetii was described according to shedding kinetic patterns. Coxiella burnetii shedding was found scarcely and sporadically in faeces. Vaginal mucus shedding concerned almost 50% of the cows studied and was found intermittently or sporadically, depending on the periodicity considered. Almost 40% of cows were detected as milk shedders, with two predominant shedding patterns: persistent and sporadic, regardless of the sampling periodicity. Significantly higher estimated titres in Coxiella burnetii were observed in cows with persistent shedding patterns suggesting the existence of heavy shedder cows. These latter cows were mostly, persistently highly-seropositive, suggesting that repeated serological testings could be a reliable tool to screen heavy shedders, before using PCR assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17903418     DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2007038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res        ISSN: 0928-4249            Impact factor:   3.683


  30 in total

1.  Genotyping reveals the presence of a predominant genotype of Coxiella burnetii in consumer milk products.

Authors:  Jeroen J H C Tilburg; Hendrik Jan I J Roest; Marrigje H Nabuurs-Franssen; Alphons M Horrevorts; Corné H W Klaassen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Seroprevalence and risk factors of Coxiella burnetii infection in cattle in northeast Algeria.

Authors:  Salah Eddine Menadi; Alessandra Mura; Cinzia Santucciu; Farida Ghalmi; Fella Hafsi; Giovanna Masala
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  How human brucellosis incidence in urban Kampala can be reduced most efficiently? A stochastic risk assessment of informally-marketed milk.

Authors:  Kohei Makita; Eric M Fèvre; Charles Waiswa; Mark C Eisler; Susan C Welburn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Circulation of Coxiella burnetii in a Naturally Infected Flock of Dairy Sheep: Shedding Dynamics, Environmental Contamination, and Genotype Diversity.

Authors:  A Joulié; K Laroucau; X Bailly; M Prigent; P Gasqui; E Lepetitcolin; B Blanchard; E Rousset; K Sidi-Boumedine; E Jourdain
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Coxiella burnetii shedding routes and antibody response after outbreaks of Q fever-induced abortion in dairy goat herds.

Authors:  Elodie Rousset; Mustapha Berri; Benoit Durand; Philippe Dufour; Myriam Prigent; Thibault Delcroix; Anne Touratier; Annie Rodolakis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Coxiella burnetii associated reproductive disorders in domestic animals--a critical review.

Authors:  Jørgen S Agerholm
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 1.695

7.  No indication of Coxiella burnetii infection in Norwegian farmed ruminants.

Authors:  Annette H Kampen; Petter Hopp; Gry M Grøneng; Ingrid Melkild; Anne Margrete Urdahl; Ann-Charlotte Karlsson; Jorun Tharaldsen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) infection in dairy cattle and associated risk factors in Latvia.

Authors:  A Boroduske; J Trofimova; J Kibilds; U Papule; M Sergejeva; I Rodze; L Grantina-Ievina
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.434

9.  Environmental sampling coupled with real-time PCR and genotyping to investigate the source of a Q fever outbreak in a work setting.

Authors:  A Hurtado; E Alonso; I Aspiritxaga; I López Etxaniz; B Ocabo; J F Barandika; J I Fernández-Ortiz DE Murúa; F Urbaneja; R Álvarez-Alonso; I Jado; A L García-Pérez
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.434

10.  Geographical distribution modelling for Neospora caninum and Coxiella burnetii infections in dairy cattle farms in northeastern Spain.

Authors:  C Nogareda; A Jubert; V Kantzoura; M K Kouam; H Feidas; G Theodoropoulos
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.