Literature DB >> 27869481

Papillary vs Nonpapillary Puncture in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Panagiotis Kallidonis1, Iason Kyriazis1, Dimitrios Kotsiris1, Adamantia Koutava1, Wissam Kamal1, Evangelos Liatsikos1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Literature suggests that the percutaneous punctures for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) must be performed at the papilla of the renal calix and a puncture at the infundibulum or the direction of the pelvis is not advisable because of increased hemorrhagic risk. A prospective randomized study was conducted to investigate the safety in terms of blood loss of the infundibular approach for PCNL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with renal stones with an accumulative size of at least 2 cm were randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups to undergo PCNL with either papillary (Group 1) or infundibular (Group 2) renal access. The primary outcome measures were the reduction in hemoglobin on first postoperative day and the need for transfusion during the first postoperative month. Secondary endpoints included the operative and fluoroscopy time, number of accesses performed, overall complication rate, hospitalization time, and complications up to 3 months.
RESULTS: In total, 27 and 28 patients were enrolled in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Patient age, body mass index, and stone size were similar among the groups (p = 0.672, 0.256, and 0.889, respectively). Reduction in hemoglobin and transfusion rate did not differ among Groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.916, p = 1.0, respectively). Operative time was higher in the case of Group 1 (p = 0.027). The overall complications rate was 7.4% for Group 1 and 7.14% for Group 2. Hospitalization time was not significantly different in the study groups (p = 0.724).
CONCLUSIONS: The infundibular approach for PCNL to the posterior middle renal calices is not associated with higher blood loss or transfusion rate in comparison with the respective approach to the fornix of the papilla when the currently described technique is performed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  infundibular; nephrolithotomy; papillary; percutaneous; randomized

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27869481     DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  12 in total

1.  Papillary puncture: still a good practice.

Authors:  Davide Campobasso; Stefania Ferretti; Antonio Frattini
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - Tips and tricks to improve outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cecilia Maria Cracco; Cesare Marco Scoffone
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-08-25

3.  Papillary puncture: no way!

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Arman Tsaturyan; Marco Lattarulo; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-06-05

Review 5.  Percutaneous puncture during PCNL: new perspective for the future with virtual imaging guidance.

Authors:  E Checcucci; D Amparore; G Volpi; F Piramide; S De Cillis; A Piana; P Alessio; P Verri; S Piscitello; B Carbonaro; J Meziere; D Zamengo; A Tsaturyan; G Cacciamani; Juan Gomez Rivas; S De Luca; M Manfredi; C Fiori; E Liatsikos; F Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Presence of a Novel Anatomical Structure May Cause Bleeding When Using the Calyx Access in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Fangyou Lin; Bojun Li; Ting Rao; Yuan Ruan; Weimin Yu; Fan Cheng; Stéphane Larré
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-21

7.  Nonpapillary prone endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: effectiveness, safety and tips, and tricks.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Arman Tsaturyan; Gabriel Faria-Costa; Begona Ballesta Martinez; Angelis Peteinaris; Constantinos Adamou; Konstantinos Pagonis; Anastasios Natsos; Theofanis Vrettos; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Non papillary mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: early experience.

Authors:  P Kallidonis; A Vagionis; T Vrettos; K Adamou; K Pagonis; P Ntasiotis; G A Callas; L Tanaseskou; A M Al Aown; E Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Is emergency percutaneous antegrade drainage of the upper urinary tract useful for future percutaneous nephrolithotomy access?

Authors:  Itay M Sabler; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Stavros Sfoungaristos; Amitay Lorber; Ioannis Leotsakos; Vladimir Yutkin; Guy Hidas; Ofer N Gofrit; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-12-27

10.  The Analysis of Risk Factors for Hemorrhage Associated with Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Xiangjun Meng; Juan Bao; Qiwu Mi; Shaowei Fang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.