Literature DB >> 27868341

A single-arm trial indirect comparison investigation: a proof-of-concept method to predict venous leg ulcer healing time for a new acellular synthetic matrix matched to standard care control.

Ronald Shannon1, Andrea Nelson2.   

Abstract

To compare data on time to healing from two separate cohorts: one treated with a new acellular synthetic matrix plus standard care (SC) and one matched from four large UK pragmatic, randomised controlled trials [venous leg ulcer (VLU) evidence network]. We introduce a new proof-of-concept strategy to a VLU clinical evidence network, propensity score matching and sensitivity analysis to predict the feasibility of the new acellular synthetic matrix plus SC for success in future randomised, controlled clinical trials. Prospective data on chronic VLUs from a safety and effectiveness study on an acellular synthetic matrix conducted in one wound centre in the UK (17 patients) and three wound centres in Australia (36 patients) were compared retrospectively to propensity score-matched data from patients with comparable leg ulcer disease aetiology, age, baseline ulcer area, ulcer duration, multi-layer compression bandaging and majority of care completed in specialist wound centres (average of 1 visit per week), with the outcome measures at comparable follow-up periods from patients enrolled in four prospective, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised studies of venous ulcers in the UK (the comparison group; VLU evidence network). Analysis using Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a mean healing time of 73·1 days for ASM plus SC (ASM) treated ulcers in comparison with 83·5 days for comparison group ulcers treated with SC alone (Log rank test, χ2 5·779, P = 0·016) within 12 weeks. Sensitivity analysis indicates that an unobserved covariate would have to change the odds of healing for SC by a factor of 1·1 to impact the baseline results. Results from this study predict a significant effect on healing time when using a new ASM as an adjunct to SC in the treatment of non-healing venous ulcers in the UK, but results are sensitive to unobserved covariates that may be important in healing time comparison.
© 2016 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acellular synthetic matrix; Evidence network; Non-healing leg ulcer; Predictive analytics; Propensity score; VenUS I study; VenUS II study; VenUS III study; VenUS IV study; Venous ulcers; Wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27868341      PMCID: PMC7949811          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  51 in total

1.  Reliability of wound surface area measurements.

Authors:  C Majeske
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-02

2.  Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect.

Authors:  Tobias Kurth; Alexander M Walker; Robert J Glynn; K Arnold Chan; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; James M Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The Ulcerated Leg Severity Assessment score for prediction of venous leg ulcer healing.

Authors:  S R Kulkarni; M S Gohel; C Wakely; J Minor; K R Poskitt; M R Whyman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  'Mouseyes': an aid to wound measurement using a computer.

Authors:  R J Taylor
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.072

Review 5.  Wound duration and healing rates: cause or effect?

Authors:  David C Bosanquet; Keith G Harding
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  Diagnosis and treatment of venous ulcers.

Authors:  Lauren Collins; Samina Seraj
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.292

7.  Etiology of chronic leg ulcers in 31,619 patients in Germany analyzed by an expert survey.

Authors:  Andreas Körber; Joachim Klode; Samy Al-Benna; Caroline Wax; Dirk Schadendorf; Lars Steinstraesser; Joachim Dissemond
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.584

Review 8.  Recent insights into the causes of chronic leg ulceration in venous diseases and implications on other types of chronic wounds.

Authors:  W Y John Chen; Alan A Rogers
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.617

9.  Use of weekly, low dose, high frequency ultrasound for hard to heal venous leg ulcers: the VenUS III randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Judith M Watson; Arthur R Kang'ombe; Marta O Soares; Ling-Hsiang Chuang; Gill Worthy; J Martin Bland; Cynthia Iglesias; Nicky Cullum; David Torgerson; E Andrea Nelson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-03-08

10.  CICATRIZATION OF WOUNDS : II. MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION OF THE CURVE REPRESENTING CICATRIZATION.

Authors:  P L Du Noüy
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1916-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  1 in total

1.  Health Economics and Outcomes Research of Wound Care: Overview of Methodology.

Authors:  Adrienne M Gilligan
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.730

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.