Literature DB >> 27868236

National continuous surveys on internal quality control for HbA1c in 306 clinical laboratories of China from 2012 to 2016: Continual improvement.

Tingting Li1, Wei Wang1, Haijian Zhao1, Falin He1, Kun Zhong1, Shuai Yuan1, Zhiguo Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate whether the quality performance of clinical laboratories in China has been greatly improved and whether Internal Quality Control (IQC) practice of HbA1c has also been changed since National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL) of China organized laboratories to report IQC data for HbA1c in 2012.
METHODS: Internal Quality Control information of 306 External Quality Assessment (EQA) participant laboratories which kept reporting IQC data in February from 2012 to 2016 were collected by Web-based EQA system. Then percentages of laboratories meeting four different imprecision specifications for current coefficient of variations (CVs) of HbA1c measurements were calculated. Finally, we comprehensively analyzed analytical systems and IQC practice of HbA1c measurements.
RESULTS: The current CVs of HbA1c tests have decreased significantly from 2012 to 2016. And percentages of laboratories meeting four imprecision specifications for CVs all showed the increasing tendency year by year. As for analytical system, 52.1% (159/306) laboratories changed their systems with the change in principle of assay. And many laboratories began to use cation exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (CE-HPLC) instead of Immunoturbidimetry, because CE-HPLC owed a lower intra-laboratory CVs. The data of IQC practice, such as IQC rules and frequency, also showed significant variability among years with overall tendency of meeting requirements.
CONCLUSION: The imprecision performance of HbA1c tests has been improved in these 5 years with the change in IQC practice, but it is still disappointing in China. Therefore, laboratories should actively find existing problems and take action to promote performance of HbA1c measurements.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HbA1c; clinical laboratory; coefficient of variation; diabetes; diagnosis; imprecision; internal quality control; quality specification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27868236      PMCID: PMC6817230          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  14 in total

Review 1.  Internal quality control: best practice.

Authors:  Helen Kinns; Sarah Pitkin; David Housley; Danielle B Freedman
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Proposals for setting generally applicable quality goals solely based on biology.

Authors:  C G Fraser; P Hyltoft Petersen; J C Libeer; C Ricos
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.057

4.  Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.

Authors:  Sverre Sandberg; Callum G Fraser; Andrea Rita Horvath; Rob Jansen; Graham Jones; Wytze Oosterhuis; Per Hyltoft Petersen; Heinz Schimmel; Ken Sikaris; Mauro Panteghini
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  David B Sacks; Mark Arnold; George L Bakris; David E Bruns; Andrea Rita Horvath; M Sue Kirkman; Ake Lernmark; Boyd E Metzger; David M Nathan
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Feasibility of centralized measurements of glycated hemoglobin in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial: a multicenter study. The DCCT Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 7.  Status of hemoglobin A1c measurement and goals for improvement: from chaos to order for improving diabetes care.

Authors:  Randie R Little; Curt L Rohlfing; David B Sacks
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  The national glycohemoglobin standardization program: a five-year progress report.

Authors:  R R Little; C L Rohlfing; H M Wiedmeyer; G L Myers; D B Sacks; D E Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Utilization of assay performance characteristics to estimate hemoglobin A1c result reliability.

Authors:  Alison Woodworth; Nichole Korpi-Steiner; James J Miller; Lokinendi V Rao; John Yundt-Pacheco; Lakshmi Kuchipudi; Curtis A Parvin; Jeanne M Rhea; Ross Molinaro
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 17.152

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quality specification and status of internal quality control of cardiac biomarkers in China from 2011 to 2016.

Authors:  Tingting Li; Wei Wang; Haijian Zhao; Falin He; Kun Zhong; Shuai Yuan; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.