Literature DB >> 27866726

Trends in mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer; a twelve year experience from a tertiary care center.

James M Chang1, Heidi E Kosiorek2, Amylou C Dueck2, William J Casey2, Alanna M Rebecca3, Raman Mahabir3, Samir H Patel4, Sameer R Keole4, William W Wong4, Carlos E Vargas4, Michele Y Halyard4, Richard J Gray1, Nabil Wasif1, Chee-Chee H Stucky1, Barbara A Pockaj5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many surgical options exist for breast cancer, including breast conserving therapy (BCT), mastectomy with reconstruction (MAST+RECON) or without reconstruction (MAST). Long-term results regarding oncologic outcomes are few and primarily retrospective studies.
METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing breast surgery for breast cancer from 2002 to 2014 was performed. Patients were separated into 3 time periods for analysis: 2002 to 2005, 2006 to 2009, and 2010 to 2014. Recurrence outcomes were compared at 4 years between MAST+RECON patients.
RESULTS: Two thousand seventy-six patients were identified: 61.2% underwent BCT, 19.7% had MAST, and 19.1% had MAST+RECON. BCT patients were older and had smaller tumors. MAST+RECON increased in prevalence, whereas BCT decreased. Implant-based reconstruction and conservative mastectomy rates increased over the study period. Four-year local recurrence-free rates were similar in nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy groups.
CONCLUSIONS: BCT usage has decreased, trending toward immediate, nipple-sparing mastectomy, implant-based reconstruction. Surgeons should be aware of trends to optimally offer patients their surgical options. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast conserving therapy; Breast reconstruction; Mastectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27866726     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  11 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Sequential Decision Tree Analysis Reveals Pivotal Branch Points in Predicting Implant-Based Reconstruction Failure Outcomes.

Authors:  Jie Jane Chen; Kathleen C Horst
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Nonresponse bias in survey research: lessons from a prospective study of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas L Berlin; Jennifer B Hamill; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Development of a Classification Tree to Predict Implant-Based Reconstruction Failure with or without Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jie Jane Chen; Rie von Eyben; Paulina M Gutkin; Erin Hawley; Frederick M Dirbas; Gordon K Lee; Kathleen C Horst
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Paradigm shift in the local treatment of breast cancer: mastectomy to breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Kowsi Murugappan; Apoorva Saboo; Lu Kuo; Owen Ung
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

5.  Neuromuscular compensation strategies adopted at the shoulder following bilateral subpectoral implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Joshua M Leonardis; Whitney L Wolff; Adeyiza O Momoh; David B Lipps
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Association of type 2 diabetes with in-hospital complications among women undergoing breast cancer surgical procedures. A retrospective study using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Ana Lopez-de-Andres; Isabel Jimenez-Trujillo; Valentin Hernandez-Barrera; Javier de Miguel-Diez; Manuel Mendez-Bailon; Jose M de Miguel-Yanes; Napoleon Perez-Farinos; Miguel Angel Salinero-Fort; Jose L Del Barrio; Martin Romero-Maroto; Rodrigo Jimenez-Garcia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Cost-effectiveness of different surgical treatment approaches for early breast cancer: a retrospective matched cohort study from China.

Authors:  Qing Yang; Xiaorong Zhong; Wei Zhang; Ting Luo; Ping He; Hong Zheng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Is Mastectomy Oncologically Safer than Breast-Conserving Treatment in Early Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Fabian Riedel; André Hennigs; Sarah Hug; Benedikt Schaefgen; Christof Sohn; Florian Schuetz; Michael Golatta; Jörg Heil
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  In the Age of Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction Provides an Opportunity to Augment the Breast.

Authors:  Amanda L Zimmerman; Bugra Tugertimur; Paul D Smith; Ambuj Kumar; Deniz Dayicioglu
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

10.  Dimensional changes in reconstructed nipples: autologous versus prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Chae Eun Yang; Kwang Hyun Park; Dae Hyun Lew; Tai Suk Roh; Dong Won Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 1.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.