Literature DB >> 33744721

Neuromuscular compensation strategies adopted at the shoulder following bilateral subpectoral implant breast reconstruction.

Joshua M Leonardis1, Whitney L Wolff1, Adeyiza O Momoh2, David B Lipps3.   

Abstract

Immediate two-stage subpectoral implant breast reconstruction after mastectomy requires the surgical disinsertion of the sternocostal fiber region of the pectoralis major (PM). The disinsertion of the PM would need increased contributions from intact shoulder musculature to generate shoulder torques. This study aimed to identify neuromuscular compensation strategies adopted by subpectoral implant breast reconstruction patients using novel muscle synergy analyses. Fourteen patients treated bilaterally with subpectoral implant breast reconstruction (>2.5 years post-reconstruction) were compared to ten healthy controls. Surface electromyography was obtained from sixteen shoulder muscles as participants generated eight three-dimensional (3D) shoulder torques in five two-dimensional arm postures bilaterally. Non-negative matrix factorization revealed the muscle synergies utilized by each experimental group on the dominant and non-dominant limbs, and the normalized similarity index assessed group differences in overall synergy structure. Bilateral subpectoral implant patients exhibited similar shoulder strength to healthy controls on the dominant and non-dominant arms. Our results suggest that 3D shoulder torque is driven by three shoulder muscle synergies in both healthy participants and subpectoral implant patients. Two out of three synergies were more similar than is expected by chance between the groups on the non-dominant arm, whereas only one synergy is more similar than is expected by chance on the dominant arm. While bilateral shoulder strength is maintained following bilateral subpectoral implant breast reconstruction, a closer analysis of the muscle synergy patterns underlying 3D shoulder torque generation reveals that subpectoral implant patients adopt compensatory neuromuscular strategies only with the dominant arm.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction; Electromyography; Muscle synergy; Neuromuscular system

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33744721      PMCID: PMC9044909          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.789


  46 in total

1.  Moment arms of the muscles crossing the anatomical shoulder.

Authors:  David C Ackland; Ponnaren Pak; Martin Richardson; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Computer simulation of pectoralis major muscle strain to guide exercise protocols for patients after breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Caroline W Stegink-Jansen; William L Buford; Rita M Patterson; Lisa J Gould
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Bilateral Mastectomy versus Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The Role of Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Claudia R Albornoz; Evan Matros; Clara N Lee; Clifford A Hudis; Andrea L Pusic; Elena Elkin; Peter B Bach; Peter G Cordeiro; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Impact of combined skin sparing mastectomy and immediate subpectoral prosthetic reconstruction on the pectoralis major muscle function: a preoperative and postoperative comparative study.

Authors:  J Joris Hage; Jorine F van der Heeden; Kristel M Lankhorst; Suzanne M G Romviel; Maaike E Vluttters; Leonie A E Woerdeman; Bart Visser; H E J Veeger
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  Alterations in upper limb muscle synergy structure in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Jinsook Roh; William Z Rymer; Eric J Perreault; Seng Bum Yoo; Randall F Beer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Impact of availability of immediate breast reconstruction on bilateral mastectomy rates for breast cancer across the United States: data from the nationwide inpatient sample.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Habermann; Kristine M Thomsen; Tina J Hieken; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Jan Lubinski; Parviz Ghadirian; Henry Lynch; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Eitan Friedman; William D Foulkes; Susan Domchek; Peter Ainsworth; Claudine Isaacs; Nadine Tung; Jacek Gronwald; Shelly Cummings; Teresa Wagner; Siranoush Manoukian; Pål Møller; Jeffrey Weitzel; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Function of the pectoralis major muscle after combined skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction by subpectoral implantation of a prosthesis.

Authors:  Annemiek de Haan; Annelies Toor; J Joris Hage; H E J Veeger; Leonie A E Woerdeman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Common muscle synergies for balance and walking.

Authors:  Stacie A Chvatal; Lena H Ting
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  The effect of arm weight support on upper limb muscle synergies during reaching movements.

Authors:  Martina Coscia; Vincent C K Cheung; Peppino Tropea; Alexander Koenig; Vito Monaco; Caoimhe Bennis; Silvestro Micera; Paolo Bonato
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.