Literature DB >> 27866164

Relationship Between Anemia and Mortality Outcomes in a National Acute Coronary Syndrome Cohort: Insights From the UK Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project Registry.

Mamas A Mamas1,2,3, Chun Shing Kwok4,2, Evangelos Kontopantelis3, Anthony A Fryer5,2, Iain Buchan3, Max O Bachmann6,7, M Justin Zaman7,8, Phyo K Myint7,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aim to determine the prevalence of anemia in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and compare their clinical characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes to those without anemia in an unselected national ACS cohort. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry collects data on all adults admitted to hospital trusts in England and Wales with diagnosis of an ACS. We conducted a retrospective cohort study by analyzing patients in this registry between January 2006 and December 2010 and followed them up until August 2011. Multiple logistic regressions were used to determine factors associated with anemia and the adjusted odds of 30-day mortality with 1 g/dL incremental hemoglobin increase and the 30-day and 1-year mortality for anemic compared to nonanemic groups. Analyses were adjusted for covariates. Our analysis of 422 855 patients with ACS showed that 27.7% of patients presenting with ACS are anemic and that these patients are older, have a greater prevalence of renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and previous acute myocardial infarction, and are less likely to receive evidence-based therapies shown to improve clinical outcomes. Finally, our analysis suggests that anemia is independently associated with 30-day (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.22-1.35) and 1-year mortality (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.27-1.35), and we observed a reverse J-shaped relationship between hemoglobin levels and mortality outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anemia in a contemporary national ACS cohort is clinically significant. Patients with anemia are older and multimorbid and less likely to receive evidence-based therapies shown to improve clinical outcomes, with the presence of anemia independently associated with mortality outcomes.
© 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome; anemia; mortality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27866164      PMCID: PMC5210321          DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc        ISSN: 2047-9980            Impact factor:   5.501


Introduction

Both registry data1, 2, 3, 4 and secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials5, 6, 7 have suggested that the burden of anemia in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is significant. A recent meta‐analysis of 27 studies including 233 144 patients has reported a prevalence of anemia in ACS patients close to 20%,8 and current clinical guidelines fail to offer firm recommendations for its concurrent management in the ACS setting.9, 10 Patients with anemia are older3, 6, 7, 11 with a significantly greater burden of comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease,12, 13, 14 diabetes,6, 13, 14 heart failure,13, 15 and more extensive coronary artery disease6 and are less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization.4, 6, 11 These adverse clinical characteristics are well known to contribute to adverse outcomes in patients with ACS. Previous reports have suggested that ACS patients with anemia have significantly worse in‐hospital and longer‐term total and cardiac mortality outcomes,5, 6, 7, 16, 17 heart failure,18 and risk of major bleeding6 and of reinfarction.6, 8, 19 Some studies have reported that, once differences in age or comorbidity burden between anemic/nonanemic ACS cohorts are adjusted for, anemia is no longer an independent predictor of adverse mortality20 or cardiovascular mortality,21 although other studies report that the relationship persists.6, 7, 19, 22 Other studies have reported different relationships between anemia and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes according to sex, with baseline anemia independently associated with higher rates of all‐cause and cardiac mortality at 30 days and 1 year in men but not in women.7 Data derived from secondary analyses from randomized controlled trials (RCT) have suggested adverse mortality outcomes associated with anemia in patients with ACS,5, 6, 23 but such RCTs often exclude older patients with the most severe comorbid conditions and may therefore underreport the prevalence of anemia and underestimate its prognostic impact. Many of the studies that have reported relationships between anemia and adverse outcomes in the setting of ACS have not adjusted for or excluded patients with major bleeding events3, 5, 24 that may further confound the relationships reported. We have estimated the prevalence of anemia in ACS patients and compared their clinical characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes to those without anemia in an unselected national ACS cohort derived from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, which collects data on all patients in the UK admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of ACS. We also examined the relationship between anemia and short‐ (30‐day) and longer‐term (1‐year) mortality outcomes in this setting and assessed whether the prognostic impact of anemia relates to its severity.

Methods

Study Design and Population

The MINAP registry collects data on all patients aged 18 or over in the United Kingdom who are admitted to all 230 NHS hospital trusts in England and Wales with a confirmed diagnosis of an ACS. We analyzed data from the registry for patients admitted between January 2006 and December 2010 on this registry and followed them up until August 2011. Participants were included in the current study if they had a diagnosis of any ACS (ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], non‐‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI], or unstable angina) determined by the medical team at time of discharge. Mortality outcome was ascertained by linkage through the Office of National Statistics.25

Data Collection

The MINAP data set collects standardized data on prehospital and in‐hospital care for all ACS admissions from all 230 NHS trusts in England and Wales and is part of the NHS data dictionary (http://www.hqip.org.uk/minap-2013-report/). The data are collected by nurses and clinical audit staff and contain 123 fields. The details of development and initial findings are reported elsewhere.26 In the current study variables included in the analyses were hemoglobin at the time of admission with an ACS, age, sex, smoking status, peak troponin levels, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, prior angina, prior myocardial infarction, prior heart failure, prior stroke, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, renal failure, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior coronary artery bypass graft, prior medications (angiotensin‐converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor, β‐blocker, statin, clopidogrel, aspirin), clinical diagnosis (unstable angina, NSTEMI, STEMI), discharge medications (ACE inhibitor, β‐blocker, statin, clopidogrel, aspirin), angiography, in‐hospital bleeding, and mortality outcomes in hospital and within 30 days and 1 year. World Health Organization (WHO) hemoglobin thresholds were used to define anemia as <13 g/dL for men and <12 g/dL for women.

Statistical Analysis

Multiple imputations by chained equations in STATA version 13.0 were used to impute missing values for variables where possible. We describe baseline variables according to whether they were missing or nonmissing in tables, and details of participant inclusion are shown graphically. Descriptive statistics are presented for baseline variables and outcome according to anemia status and sex. Associations between anemia status and individual variables were tested using 1‐way analysis of variance for continuous variables and Chi‐squared test for categorical variables. We used multiple logistic regression with adjustments for baseline variables to determine factors associated with anemia. The same regression methods were used to determine the adjusted odds of 30‐day mortality with 1 g/dL incremental hemoglobin increase from <10 to ≥18 g/dL for men and from <9 to ≥17 g/dL for women. These results were presented graphically. Additional analyses were performed to determine the adjusted odds ratio of mortality at 30 days and 1 year for anemic compared to nonanemic groups for the whole cohort, the male‐only cohort, female‐only cohort, NSTEMI cohort, STEMI cohort, and subgroups where bleeding was excluded. The baseline variables of the group of participants who bled and did not bleed were also compared. Further analysis was performed restricting the cohort that had no imputations. Severity of anemia was examined by stratifying the cohort by sex‐specific hemoglobin cutoffs (Hb <10 g/dL, Hb 10‐11 g/dL, Hb 11‐12 g/dL, Hb 12‐13 g/dL, Hb ≥13 g/dL for men and Hb <9 g/dL, Hb 9‐10 g/dL, Hb 10‐11 g/dL, Hb 11‐12 g/dL, Hb ≥12 g/dL for women). To better control for baseline differences across the anemic and nonanemic groups, further analysis was performed using propensity score matching (mi estimate:teffects psmatch) to estimate average treatment effects (ATE). Although multiple regression is the most widely used method to control for measured confounders, it can be inadequate when the 2 comparator groups (anemia vs no anemia in our analyses) are very different across key confounders. Propensity score matching can be a better approach in such extreme scenarios and can thus serve as a useful sensitivity analysis. Propensity scores were calculated using multiple logistic regression, and then 1:1 matching with replacement (ie, including all cases and controls) was performed prior to simple logistic regression models to obtain the ATE. Statistics to demonstrate the success of the matching are also reported.

Ethical Considerations

The current study obtained the ethical approval from the Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee, University of East Anglia. Informed consent from participants was waived as data were routinely collected, and only anonymized data were used in the study.

Results

There were a total of 424 848 participants in the MINAP cohort between January 2006 and December 2010 who were followed up until August 2011. Of them, hemoglobin values were recorded in 257 999 patients. Figure S1 shows the flow diagram of participant inclusion, and comparison of characteristics between those with and without available data on Hb did not show any material differences (Table S1). The prevalence of anemia in this cohort was 71 223/256 744 (27.7%). After multiple imputations the sample size of the complete data set with all imputed variables was 256 744. The descriptive statistics of baseline variables in the included cohort, sorted by anemia status, are shown in Table 1. The anemic cohort was significantly older, with a higher proportion of smokers (85% vs 68%, P<0.001), prior hypertension (59% vs 48%, P<0.001), angina (43% vs 27%, P<0.001), myocardial infarction (38% vs 23%, P<0.001), prior heart failure (12% vs 4%, P<0.001), stroke (14% vs 7%, P<0.001), peripheral vascular disease (8% vs 3%, P<0.001), COPD (18% vs 14%, P<0.001), diabetes (31% vs 16%, P<0.001), and renal failure (19% vs 4%, P<0.001). Participants who were anemic were more likely to have aspirin and clopidogrel prior to admission (7% vs 5%, P<0.001) and less likely to be prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy on discharge (75% vs 79%, P<0.001). Participants whose anemia occurred in the context of a bleeding complication were more likely to be female, to be on aspirin before admission and on discharge (30% vs 28%, P<0.001), to have STEMI diagnosis (52% vs 38%, P<0.001), to be less likely to receive angiography (26% vs 38%, P<0.001) and more likely to die at 30 days (6% versus 3%, P<0.001) and 1 year (12% vs 8%, P<0.001) (Table S2). Similar rates of angiography were performed in the anemic versus nonanemic cohort, but patients with anemia were significantly less likely to be prescribed secondary prevention medications postdischarge. The difference in crude mortality rates between the anemic and nonanemic groups increased with longer follow‐up.
Table 1

Baseline Characteristic of the MINAP Cohort According to Anemia Status

Variablea, b No Anemia (n=185 521)Anemia (n=71 223) P Valueb
Mean age, y66 (±14)76 (±12)<0.001
Male (%)124 143/185 521 (67%)44 027/71 223 (62%)<0.001
Current or ex‐smokers118 634/174 003 (68%)54 361/64 210 (85%)<0.001
Peak troponinNA
 Median troponin I (IQR), μg/L1.1 (0.2‐7.1)1.0 (0.2‐5.3)
 Median troponin T (IQR), μg/L1.2 (0.2‐7.4)1.0 (0.2‐5.6)
 Mean troponin I (SD), μg/L10 (±24)9 (±22)
 Mean troponin T (SD), μg/L10 (±22)8 (±20)
Comorbidities
 Hyperlipidemia62 060/113 535 (35%)24 442/67 499 (36%)<0.001
 Hypertension86 052/1 802 044 (48%)40 573/69 230 (59%)<0.001
 Prior angina47 915/179 636 (27%)29 629/68 890 (43%)<0.001
 Prior myocardial infarction41 215/180 166 (23%)26 028/69 119 (38%)<0.001
 Prior heart failure7286/177 567 (4%)7870/68 411 (12%)<0.001
 Stroke12 320/177 656 (7%)9337/68 636 (14%)<0.001
 PVD5852/171 572 (3%)5019/66 849 (8%)<0.001
 COPD24 625/173 811 (14%)12 489/67 813 (18%)<0.001
 Diabetes29 016/180 989 (16%)21 915/69 594 (31%)<0.001
 Renal failure7025/177 840 (4%)13 283/68 831 (19%)<0.001
 Prior PCI18 865/179 306 (11%)8354/68 560 (12%)<0.001
 Prior CABG10 522/179 580 (6%)6858/68 799 (10%)<0.001
Medications prior to admission
 ACE inhibitor59 891/171 542 (35%)31 984/66 325 (48%)<0.001
 β‐Blocker49 387/171 865 (29%)25 446/66 413 (38%)<0.001
 Statin71 339/173 840 (41%)37 842/66 978 (57%)<0.001
 Clopidogrel13 506/81 575 (17%)6782/29 402 (23%)<0.001
 Aspirin46 856/167 055 (28%)18 593/64 237 (29%)<0.001
 Aspirin and clopidogrel3490/72 682 (5%)1814/26 198 (7%)<0.001
Diagnosis at current admission<0.001
 NSTEMI or unstable angina104 928/170 135 (62%)41 049/65 285 (63%)
 STEMI65 207/170 135 (38%)24 235/65 285 (37%)
Medications at discharge
 ACE inhibitor121 885/185 521 (66%)39 458/71 223 (55%)<0.001
 β‐Blocker117 353/185 521 (63%)38 709/71 223 (54%)<0.001
 Statin136 696/185 521 (74%)47 976/71 223 (67%)<0.001
 Clopidogrel56 980/64 186 (89%)17 381/20 595 (84%)<0.001
 Aspirin129 872/145 076 (90%)49 657/55 517 (89%)0.623
 Aspirin and clopidogrel39 445/50 208 (79%)12 065/16 098 (75%)<0.001
Angiography performed
 Angiography70 914/185 521 (38%)27 034/71 223 (38%)0.319
Mortality outcomes
 Mortality at 30 days3425/184 228 (2%)3691/70 771 (5%)<0.001
 Mortality at 1 year8520/183 041 (5%)9173/70 339 (13%)<0.001
Bleeding outcomes
 In‐hospital bleeding3475/174 183 (2%)1337/67 023 (2%)0.998

BMI indicates body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MINAP, Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project; NSTEMI, non‐‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; STEMI, ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Results reported as mean (SD) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables.

Logistic regression (continuous variables), Chi‐squared test (categorical variables).

Baseline Characteristic of the MINAP Cohort According to Anemia Status BMI indicates body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MINAP, Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project; NSTEMI, non‐‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; STEMI, ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Results reported as mean (SD) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. Logistic regression (continuous variables), Chi‐squared test (categorical variables). Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the independent factors associated with the presence of anemia at baseline (Table 2). The most significant associations were observed with presence of peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.427, 95% CI 1.362‐1.496, P<0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.786, 95% CI 1.742‐1.832, P<0.001), and renal disease (OR 3.058, 95% CI 2.962‐3.158, P<0.001).
Table 2

Significant Factors Associated With Anemia (n=422 855): Logistic Regression Modela

VariableOdds Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Age1.046 (1.045‐1.046)<0.001
Male sex1.108 (1.088‐1.128)<0.001
Smoker1.243 (1.216‐1.271)<0.001
Hypercholesterolemia0.896 (0.876‐0.916)<0.001
Angina1.208 (1.182‐1.235)<0.001
Previous myocardial infarction1.208 (1.182‐1.235)<0.001
Previous heart failure1.242 (1.192‐1.293)<0.001
Previous stroke1.191 (1.153‐1.230)<0.001
PVD1.427 (1.362‐1.496)<0.001
COPD1.109 (1.083‐1.136)<0.001
Diabetes mellitus1.786 (1.742‐1.832)<0.001
Renal disease3.058 (2.962‐3.158)<0.001
Previous PCI0.967 (0.935‐1.000)0.05
Previous CABG1.074 (1.040‐1.110)<0.001
Admission medication
 Clopidogrel1.223 (1.186‐1.262)<0.001
 Aspirin1.024 (1.004‐1.045)<0.001

CABG indicates coronary artery bypass graft; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PVD, peripheral vascular disease.

All covariates in the table were included in the multiple logistic regression.

Significant Factors Associated With Anemia (n=422 855): Logistic Regression Modela CABG indicates coronary artery bypass graft; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PVD, peripheral vascular disease. All covariates in the table were included in the multiple logistic regression. The adjusted odds of mortality by incremental (1 g/dL) increase in hemoglobin are shown in Figure 1. Lower hemoglobin values were associated with significantly higher mortality with a nonsignificant trend toward higher mortality in those patients with elevated hemoglobin values.
Figure 1

Adjusted odds of mortality at 30 days according to hemoglobin levels for men and women. Adjusted for age, sex, current or ex‐smokers, troponin, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, prior angina, prior myocardial infarction, prior heart failure, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, renal failure, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior coronary artery bypass graft, medications prior to admission, diagnosis, medications at discharge and angiography.

Adjusted odds of mortality at 30 days according to hemoglobin levels for men and women. Adjusted for age, sex, current or ex‐smokers, troponin, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, prior angina, prior myocardial infarction, prior heart failure, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, renal failure, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior coronary artery bypass graft, medications prior to admission, diagnosis, medications at discharge and angiography. The odds of mortality associated with the presence of anemia following adjustment for baseline covariates are shown in Table 3. We observed that there was a ~1.3‐fold increase in odds of 30‐day mortality (OR 1.281, 95% CI 1.217‐1.350, P<0.001) and 1‐year (OR 1.311, 95% CI 1.274‐1.348, P<0.001) mortality, respectively, with anemia after adjustment for potential confounders. Similar significant increases in mortality with anemia were observed for men (30‐day mortality OR 1.298, 95% CI 1.217‐1.384, P<0.001; 1‐year mortality OR 1.354, 95% CI 1.299‐1.411, P<0.001) and women (30‐day mortality OR 1.255, 95% CI 1.146‐1.374, P<0.001; 1‐year mortality OR 1.252, 95% CI 1.198‐1.309, P<0.001) as well as diagnosis of NSTEMI (30‐day mortality OR 1.291, 95% CI 1.213‐1.374, P<0.001; 1‐year mortality OR 1.326, 95% CI 1.281‐1.374, P<0.001) and STEMI (30‐day mortality OR 1.269, 95% CI 1.163‐1.384, P<0.001; 1‐year mortality OR 1.284, 95% CI 1.284‐1.352, P<0.001). In order to eliminate the potential confounding influence of major bleeding complications on the relationship between anemia and mortality, we repeated the analysis following exclusion of patients with major bleeding complications, and similar results were recorded (30‐day mortality OR 1.279, 95% CI 1.213‐1.348, P<0.001; 1‐year mortality OR 1.309, 95% CI 1.271‐1.347, P<0.001). Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was undertaken in patients in whom Hb values were recorded at baseline (257 999 patients), and similar independent factors associated with anemia (Table S3) and mortality outcomes associated with anemia (Table S4) were observed.
Table 3

Multivariate Association Between Anemia and Mortality: Logistic Regression Models

Mortality OutcomeNOdds Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Total cohort
Mortality at 30 days420 6141.281 (1.217‐1.350)<0.001
Mortality at 1 year418 4711.311 (1.274‐1.348)<0.001
 Men only
Mortality at 30 days274 2781.298 (1.217‐1.384)<0.001
Mortality at 1 year272 8121.354 (1.299‐1.411)<0.001
 Women only
Mortality at 30 days146 3361.255 (1.146‐1.374)<0.001
Mortality at 1 year145 6591.252 (1.198‐1.309)<0.001
 NSTEMI
Mortality at 30 days260 4461.291 (1.213‐1.374)<0.001
Mortality at 1 year259 0031.326 (1.281‐1.374)<0.001
 STEMI
Mortality at 30 days159 9621.269 (1.163‐1.384)<0.001
Mortality at 1 year159 2651.284 (1.220‐1.352)<0.001
Bleeding excluded
Mortality at 30 days412 3961.279 (1.213‐1.348)<0.001
Mortality at 1 year410 3011.309 (1.271‐1.347)<0.001
 Men only
Mortality at 30 days268 9851.293 (1.209‐1.381)<0.001
Mortality at 1 year267 5471.348 (1.294‐1.405)<0.001
 Women only
Mortality at 30 days143 3781.255 (1.150‐1.371)<0.001
Mortality at 1 year142 7201.253 (1.198‐1.310)<0.001
Total cohort without imputations
 Mortality at 30 days
Unadjusted254 9992.905 (2.770‐3.045)<0.001
Fully adjusted34 8611.472 (1.197‐1.810)<0.001
 Mortality at 1 year
Unadjusted253 3803.072 (2.978‐3.168)<0.001
Fully adjusted34 7311.588 (1.430‐1.763)<0.001

NSTEMI indicates non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Multivariate Association Between Anemia and Mortality: Logistic Regression Models NSTEMI indicates non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Propensity score matched analysis is shown in Table 4, and anemia is associated with significant increase in mortality at both 30 days and 1 year after adjustments for propensity score (30‐day mortality coefficient 0.0080, 95% CI 0.0045‐0.0114, P<0.001; 1‐year mortality coefficient 0.0173, 95% CI 0.0128‐0.0218, P<0.001).
Table 4

Propensity Score Matching Analysis on 10 Imputed Data Sets, Reporting Average Treatment Effects (ATE)

Analysis of Propensity Score Matching With ATE
OutcomeNCoefficient95% CI P Value
30‐day mortality121 9790.00800.0045 to 0.0114<0.001
1‐year mortality121 2760.01730.0128 to 0.0218<0.001
Propensity Score Matching Analysis on 10 Imputed Data Sets, Reporting Average Treatment Effects (ATE) There were also differences in baseline characteristics according to sex (Table 5). Most notably, females were younger (mean age 74 vs 67 years, P<0.001), but more were smokers (79% vs 70%, P<0.001) and hypertensive (56% vs 47%, P<0.001). However, medication at discharge was higher in men, and women had a higher proportion of patients with adverse outcomes.
Table 5

Baseline Characteristic of the MINAP Cohort in a Single Imputed Data Set According to Sex

Variablea, b Female (n=147 064)Male (n=275 791) P Valueb
Mean age, y74 (±13)67 (±14)<0.001
Current or ex‐smokers103 049/131 067 (79%)175 401/251 888 (70%)<0.001
Peak troponinNA
 Median troponin I (IQR), μg/L0.8 (0.2‐4.4)1.1 (0.2‐7.0)
 Median troponin T (IQR), μg/L0.8 (0.1‐5.6)1.3 (0.2‐9.4)
 Mean troponin I (SD), μg/L7 (±20)10 (±23)
 Mean troponin T (SD), μg/L7 (±18)10 (±22)
Comorbidities
 Hyperlipidemia45 444/132 621 (34%)88 884/247 578 (36%)<0.001
 Hypertension77 462/137 388 (56%)120 727/255 434 (47%)<0.001
 Prior angina45 397/136 047 (33%)79 718/253 809 (31%)<0.001
 Prior myocardial infarction35 001/137 514 (25%)72 795/256 934 (28%)<0.001
 Prior heart failure10 623/133 845 (8%)13 559/248 960 (5%)<0.001
 Stroke13 854/133 862 (10%)20 079/248 892 (8%)<0.001
 PVD5448/130 925 (4%)12 219/243 539 (5%)<0.001
 COPD23 962/131 774 (18%)34 462/244 671 (14%)<0.001
 Diabetes29 493/140 481 (21%)51 424/262 468 (20%)<0.001
 Renal failure9795/134 079 (7%)17 931/249 319 (7%)0.196
 Prior PCI10 595/134 947 (8%)30 254/251 990 (12%)<0.001
 Prior CABG5706/135 286 (4%)20 933/252 728 (8%)<0.001
Medications prior to admission
 ACE inhibitor49 929/126 128 (40%)88 256/234 196 (38%)<0.001
 β‐Blocker41 213/126 289 (33%)73 726/234 423 (31%)<0.001
 Statin58 420/129 601 (45%)110 898/241 129 (46%)<0.001
 Clopidogrel15 230/77 245 (20%)28 564/142 840 (20%)0.115
 Aspirin37 535/131 780 (28%)71 002/247 098 (29%)0.103
Diagnosis at current admission0.143
 NSTEMI or unstable angina83 404/134 524 (62%)155 880/252 401 (62%)
 STEMI51 120/134 524 (38%)96 521/252 401 (38%)
Medications at discharge
 ACE inhibitor83 277/147 064 (57%)171 311/275 791 (62%)<0.001
 β‐Blocker80 221/147 064 (55%)165 753/275 791 (60%)<0.001
 Statin99 246/147 064 (67%)196 756/275 791 (71%)<0.001
 Clopidogrel48 406/60 264 (80%)98 181/115 628 (85%)<0.001
 Aspirin102 340/114 611 (89%)192 059/215 135 (89%)0.862
Angiography performed
 Angiography55 049/147 064 (37%)103 267/275 791 (37%)0.939
Mortality outcomes
 Mortality at 30 days5711/146 336 (4%)7474/274 278 (3%)<0.001
 Mortality at 1 year14 149/145 659 (10%)18 481/272 812 (7%)<0.001
 In‐hospital bleeding2766/137 132 (2%)4932/257 591 (2%)0.027

BMI indicates body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MINAP, Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project; NSTEMI, non‐‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; STEMI, ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Results reported as mean (SD) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables.

Logistic regression (continuous variables), Chi‐squared test (categorical variables).

Baseline Characteristic of the MINAP Cohort in a Single Imputed Data Set According to Sex BMI indicates body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MINAP, Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project; NSTEMI, non‐‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; STEMI, ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Results reported as mean (SD) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. Logistic regression (continuous variables), Chi‐squared test (categorical variables). The sex‐specific adjusted odds of mortality by incremental (1 g/dL) increase in hemoglobin is shown in Figure 2. For both sexes, lower hemoglobin values were associated with significantly higher mortality, but high values of hemoglobin were associated with higher mortality only in men and not in women. Similar results were observed if patients with bleeding were excluded (Figure S2).
Figure 2

Adjusted odds of mortality at 30 days according to hemoglobin levels and sex. Adjusted for age, current or ex‐smokers, troponin, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, prior angina, prior myocardial infarction, prior heart failure, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, renal failure, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior coronary artery bypass graft, medications prior to admission, diagnosis, medications at discharge, and angiography.

Adjusted odds of mortality at 30 days according to hemoglobin levels and sex. Adjusted for age, current or ex‐smokers, troponin, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, prior angina, prior myocardial infarction, prior heart failure, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, renal failure, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior coronary artery bypass graft, medications prior to admission, diagnosis, medications at discharge, and angiography. In terms of severity of anemia there was an increase in mortality at both 30 days and 1 year with reduced hemoglobin, which ranged from ~1.2‐ to 1.3‐fold increase in odds of mortality for Hb 12 to 13 g/dL to a ~1.4‐ to 1.5‐fold increase for Hb <10 g/dL for men (Table 6). For women, similar results were recorded.
Table 6

Evaluation of the Severity of Anemia by Sex Using Multiple Logistic Regression

Outcome for MenHemoglobin ≥13Hemoglobin 12 to 13Hemoglobin 11 to 12Hemoglobin 10 to 11Hemoglobin <10
Crude rate of mortality at 30 days5270/230 540 (2%)666/18 252 (4%)589/10 918 (5%)458/7318 (6%)491/7250 (7%)
Adjusted odds of mortality at 30 days1.00 (reference)1.21 (1.10‐1.32), P<0.0011.35 (1.23‐1.48), P<0.0011.38 (1.23‐1.54), P<0.0011.38 (1.24‐1.54), P<0.001
Crude rate of mortality at 1 year12 967/229 347 (6%)1703/18 135 (9%)1440/10 844 (13%)1129/7276 (16%)1242/7210 (17%)
Adjusted odds of mortality at 1 year1.00 (reference)1.25 (1.18‐1.33), P<0.0011.39 (1.31‐1.48), P<0.0011.42 (1.32‐1.53), P<0.0011.52 (1.42‐1.63), P<0.001
Evaluation of the Severity of Anemia by Sex Using Multiple Logistic Regression

Discussion

Our analysis is the largest analysis to study the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes associated with anemia in an unselected national cohort of ACS patients in the United Kingdom. We have observed that more than 1 in 4 patients presenting with ACS are anemic and that these patients are older, have a greater prevalence of comorbid conditions, and are less likely to receive evidence‐based therapies shown to improve clinical outcomes. Finally, our analysis suggests that anemia is independently associated with adverse in‐hospital and longer‐term mortality outcomes, with a reverse J‐shaped relationship between Hb levels and both short and longer mortality outcomes observed. Our observed prevalence of anemia of 28% is greater than that reported in data derived from RCTs reporting rates of between 10% and 25%,5, 6, 7, 23 although registry data reveal significantly higher prevalences.4, 12, 27 For example, an analysis of 78 974 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction revealed a prevalence of anemia of 43%.12 We have observed that ACS patients with anemia are older, have a greater prevalence of comorbid conditions, and are less likely to receive evidence‐based therapies for the treatment of ACS, in agreement with previous literature.5, 6, 7, 19, 21 In the current analysis we report that the presence of anemia is independently associated with an ~50% increased risk of mortality in the short and long term and that this prognostic impact is observed in both men and women, in contrast to the findings of a secondary analysis of the HORIZONS‐AMI trial that failed to demonstrate an association between anemia and increased risk of mortality in women.7 We have observed a reverse J‐shaped relationship between decreasing Hb values and 30‐day mortality, with a dose‐response effect with progressively lower odds of survival with more profound degrees of anemia in both men and women. Similar reverse J‐shaped relationships are seen between Hb levels and CV death and the composite endpoint of CV death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent ischemic events in some studies,21 although other studies have not revealed such statistically significant relationships in either in‐hospital cardiac mortality16 or longer‐term mortality.1 Previous studies have reported that anemia is independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes, but many of these studies did not report whether patients with bleeding events were excluded from their analyses, as it is well documented that major bleeding is independently associated with mortality in the ACS setting,28, 29, 30 which might have confounded any reported relationships between the presence of anemia and mortality. In the current analysis we report anemia independently predicts adverse mortality outcomes and that the J‐shaped relationship between Hb level and mortality persists even after exclusion of patients with bleeding events. There are several biological and clinical reasons why anemia may lead to worse clinical outcomes in patients with ACS. In the setting of ACS, anemia might worsen ischemia by decreasing the oxygen delivery to the jeopardized myocardium and increase myocardial oxygen demand due to greater cardiac output to maintain adequate systemic oxygen delivery.31, 32 Clinically, patients with anemia are often underprescribed antiplatelet therapy due to bleeding concerns; for example, in our current analysis clopidogrel was prescribed in 73% of patients without anemia and 66% with anemia (P<0.001), whereas in the CADILLAC trial 18% of patients with anemia at the time of their ACS were no longer receiving aspirin at 1 year,23 which might contribute to increased cardiovascular events. Analysis of the ACUITY trial suggests that patients with anemia were less likely to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and more likely to be medically managed, which may further contribute to worse cardiovascular outcomes in this group.6 Finally, anemia may be a manifestation of numerous chronic disease states, and the presence of anemia is merely a marker of poorer outcomes in patients with chronic diseases. Our analysis suggests that anemia is independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients presenting with ACS. There is a lack of clarity in contemporary guideline recommendations as to whether such patients with anemia should be transfused and the optimal transfusion strategy.33 The American Association of Blood Banks recommendation for patients presenting with ACS is “No recommendation for or against a liberal or restrictive transfusion threshold for hospitalized, hemodynamically stable patients with acute coronary syndrome.”33 Furthermore, the CRIT (conservative vs liberal red cell transfusion in acute myocardial infarction) randomized pilot trial34 demonstrated that patients with ACS and a hematocrit level <30% who were randomized to a liberal transfusion arm had a significantly higher composite endpoint of in‐hospital death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure than those who underwent more restrictive transfusion practice (38% vs 13%; P=0.046). In contrast, in the MINT (A Multicenter, Randomized Study of Argatroban Versus Heparin as Adjunct to Tissue Plasminogen Activator [TPA] in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Myocardial Infarction With Novastan and TPA) pilot study undertaken in 110 patients presenting with an ACS or stable angina with anemia undergoing cardiac catheterization, patients randomized to a liberal blood transfusion strategy had 50% lower primary outcome rates of death, myocardial infarction, and unscheduled revascularization compared to those patients randomized to a restrictive transfusion strategy, with lower 30‐day mortality too. A recent meta‐analysis of 10 studies consisting mainly of registry studies including 203 665 patients has shown a close to 3‐fold independent increase in the risk of mortality associated with a liberal blood transfusion strategy in the AMI setting with meta‐regression adjusting for a history of bleeding or baseline hemoglobin level revealing a similar increased risk, indicating a significant risk for blood transfusion over and above that associated with bleeding or anemia,35 with similar findings reported in the PCI setting.36 Our study has some limitations. The MINAP data set requires the recording of Hb within 24 hours of admission. Many of these Hb values, particularly in the setting of hemodynamically unstable NSTEMI or STEMI treated with primary PCI, may be post‐PCI and may reflect the influence of acute bleeding complications and not reflect chronic anemia. Nevertheless, even following exclusion of patients who sustained bleeding complications during their in‐hospital course, the relationships that we examined remained unchanged. We report an association between anemia and in‐hospital and longer‐term mortality, but we cannot infer causality. Although it would be interesting to know whether anemia was associated with cardiac mortality, we were unable to determine the cause of death for participants. We have adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics between the anemic and nonanemic cohorts, but other unmeasured confounders may be contributing to the adverse clinical outcomes associated with anemia that we report. Another limitation was the missing data, which varied in extent depending on the study variable, and we tried to approximate these values using multiple imputations to impute the missing values. Finally, the MINAP data set does not record the receipt of blood transfusions, which may contribute to the adverse clinical outcomes reported.35

Conclusions

In conclusion, this is the largest study of the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes associated with anemia in an unselected national cohort of ACS patients in the United Kingdom. We report a significant prevalence of anemia in a contemporary ACS cohort, with approximately 1 in 4 patients presenting with ACS being anemic, and that these patients are older, have a greater prevalence of comorbid conditions, and are less likely to receive evidence‐based therapies shown to improve clinical outcomes. Finally, our findings suggest that anemia is independently associated with adverse 30‐day and longer‐term mortality outcomes, with a reverse J‐shaped relationship between Hb levels and mortality outcomes observed in both men and women. The clinical effectiveness of correcting anemia routinely in ACS has not been widely explored, and there is considerable uncertainty in the value of such an approach. Targeted intervention strategies in this patient population should be explored.

Author Contributions

Mamas, Zaman, and Myint conceived and planned the study. Kwok and Kontopantelis analyzed the data. Mamas and Kwok wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the findings and reporting of the work. Myint is the guarantor. Myint and Zaman are co‐PIs of the MINAP‐older age project.

Sources of Funding

The project was funded by the Halley Stewart Trust and the North Staffordshire Medical Institute. MRC Health eResearch Centre grant MR/K006665/1 supported the time and facilities of Kontopantelis. MINAP is funded by the Health Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP). This work was undertaken by the research team and funded by the Sir Halley Stewart Trust, Medical Research Council, and North Staffordshire Medical Institute. The views expressed within this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders.

Disclosures

None. Table S1. Comparison of Patients With Missing and No Missing Hemoglobin Values Table S2. Baseline Characteristic of the MINAP Cohort According to Bleeding Status Table S3. Significant Multivariate Predictors of Anemia in Patients in Whom Baseline Hemoglobin Values Were Recorded (n=256 744) Table S4. Sensitivity Analysis of Multivariate Association Between Anemia and Mortality in Patients in Whom Baseline Hemoglobin Values Were Recorded Figure S1. Flow chart of patient inclusion. Figure S2. Adjusted odds of mortality at 30 days according to hemoglobin levels and sex with exclusion of participants with bleed outcome. Click here for additional data file.
  37 in total

1.  Impact of anemia on clinical outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in relation to gender and adjunctive antithrombotic therapy (from the HORIZONS-AMI trial).

Authors:  Kenichi Tsujita; Eugenia Nikolsky; Alexandra J Lansky; George Dangas; Martin Fahy; Bruce R Brodie; Dariusz Dudek; Martin Möckel; Andrzej Ochala; Roxana Mehran; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Association of blood transfusion with increased mortality in myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted study sequential analysis.

Authors:  Saurav Chatterjee; Jørn Wetterslev; Abhishek Sharma; Edgar Lichstein; Debabrata Mukherjee
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Effect of anemia on frequency of short- and long-term clinical events in acute coronary syndromes (from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy Trial).

Authors:  Vijay Kunadian; Roxana Mehran; A Michael Lincoff; Frederick Feit; Steven V Manoukian; Martial Hamon; David A Cox; George D Dangas; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Impact of anemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial.

Authors:  Eugenia Nikolsky; Eve D Aymong; Amir Halkin; Cindy L Grines; David A Cox; Eulogio Garcia; Roxana Mehran; James E Tcheng; John J Griffin; Giulio Guagliumi; Thomas Stuckey; Mark Turco; David A Cohen; Manuela Negoita; Alexandra J Lansky; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Predictors of major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).

Authors:  M Moscucci; K A A Fox; Christopher P Cannon; W Klein; José López-Sendón; G Montalescot; K White; R J Goldberg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Transfusion practice and outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Karen P Alexander; Anita Y Chen; Tracy Y Wang; Sunil V Rao; L Kristin Newby; Nancy M Allen LaPointe; E Magnus Ohman; Matthew T Roe; William E Boden; Robert A Harrington; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Effect of anemia on 1-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nezar Al Falluji; Janet Lawrence-Nelson; John B Kostis; Clifton R Lacy; Rajiv Ranjan; Alan C Wilson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Influence of hemoglobin level on in-hospital prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Juan José González-Ferrer; Juan Carlos García-Rubira; David Vivas Balcones; Iván Núñez Gil; Rocío Carda Barrio; Manuel Fuentes-Ferrer; Antonio Fernández-Ortiz; Carlos Macaya
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.753

9.  Baseline hemoglobin concentration and creatinine clearance composite laboratory index improves risk stratification in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Roberto R Giraldez; Marc S Sabatine; David A Morrow; Satishkumar Mohanavelu; Carolyn H McCabe; Elliott M Antman; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP).

Authors:  Emily Herrett; Liam Smeeth; Lynne Walker; Clive Weston
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.994

View more
  19 in total

1.  Lysophosphatidic acid receptors 2 and 3 regulate erythropoiesis at different hematopoietic stages.

Authors:  Jui-Chung Chiang; Wei-Min Chen; Kuan-Hung Lin; Kai Hsia; Ya-Hsuan Ho; Yueh-Chien Lin; Tang-Long Shen; Jen-Her Lu; Shih-Kuo Chen; Chao-Ling Yao; Benjamin P C Chen; Hsinyu Lee
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.698

Review 2.  Role of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Cardiovascular Protection in CKD Patients: Reappraisal of Their Impact and Mechanisms.

Authors:  Tetsuji Miura; Tatsuya Sato; Toshiyuki Yano; Akira Takaguri; Takayuki Miki; Noritsugu Tohse; Keitaro Nishizawa
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.727

3.  Relevance of pre-existing anaemia for patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome to an intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort analysis of 7418 patients.

Authors:  Patricia Wischmann; Raphael Romano Bruno; Bernhard Wernly; Georg Wolff; Shazia Afzal; Richard Rezar; Mareike Cramer; Nadia Heramvand; Malte Kelm; Christian Jung
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Anemia: A significant cardiovascular mortality risk after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by the comorbidities of hypertension and kidney disease.

Authors:  Wei-Chieh Lee; Hsiu-Yu Fang; Huang-Chung Chen; Chien-Jen Chen; Cheng-Hsu Yang; Chi-Ling Hang; Chiung-Jen Wu; Chih-Yuan Fang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Anemia and Acute Coronary Syndrome: Time for Intervention Studies.

Authors:  Serdar Farhan; Usman Baber; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 6.  Anemia and acute coronary syndrome: current perspectives.

Authors:  Miriam Stucchi; Silvia Cantoni; Enrico Piccinelli; Stefano Savonitto; Nuccia Morici
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2018-05-30

7.  Outcomes of anemic patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome: An analysis of the Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events.

Authors:  Ronald Huynh; Karice Hyun; Mario D'Souza; Nadarajah Kangaharan; Pratap C Shetty; Justin Mariani; Jens Kilian; Joseph Hung; Mark Ryan; Derek P Chew; David Brieger
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Prognosis of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular multimorbidity after acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Silvia Canivell; Olivier Muller; Baris Gencer; Dik Heg; Roland Klingenberg; Lorenz Räber; David Carballo; Christian Matter; Thomas Lüscher; Stephan Windecker; François Mach; Nicolas Rodondi; David Nanchen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of weekend admission on process of care and clinical outcomes for the management of acute coronary syndromes: a retrospective analysis of three UK centres.

Authors:  Glen P Martin; Tim Kinnaird; Matthew Sperrin; Richard Anderson; Amr Gamal; Avais Jabbar; Chun Shing Kwok; Diane Barker; Grant Heatlie; Azfar G Zaman; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Association of Coffee and Tea with Ferritin: Data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (IV and V).

Authors:  Eun Suk Sung; Chang Kyun Choi; Nu Ri Kim; Sun A Kim; Min-Ho Shin
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2018-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.