Literature DB >> 27865784

A Comparison of Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kits: Isolation and Quantification of Cell-Free DNA in Plasma.

Laure Sorber1, Karen Zwaenepoel1, Vanessa Deschoolmeester1, Geert Roeyen2, Filip Lardon3, Christian Rolfo4, Patrick Pauwels5.   

Abstract

The analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a sensitive biomarker for cancer diagnosis and monitoring has resulted in a need for efficient and standardized cfDNA isolation. In this study, we compared the isolation efficiency of the QIAamp circulating nucleic acid kit (QIA) with four other cfDNA isolation kits: the PME free-circulating DNA Extraction Kit (PME), the Maxwell RSC ccfDNA Plasma Kit (RSC), the EpiQuick Circulating Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit (EQ), and two consecutive versions of the NEXTprep-Mag cfDNA Isolation Kit (NpMV1/2). cfDNA was isolated from 10 plasma samples, of which five contained KRAS mutated cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA). Digital droplet PCR was used to quantify the total cfDNA concentration as well as the KRAS mutated ctDNA fraction. cfDNA integrity was assessed with real-time quantitative PCR. The QIA and the RSC kits displayed similar isolation efficiencies of both KRAS mutated ctDNA and nonmutated cfDNA, whereas the yield generated by the PME and NpMV2 kits was significantly lower. Real-time quantitative PCR indicated the presence of digital droplet PCR inhibiting agents in the eluates of the NpMV1 and EQ kits. To conclude, this study presents two highly efficient isolation kits for cfDNA isolation, of which the RSC kit has the advantage of a fully automated protocol over the labor-intensive QIA kit.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27865784     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  48 in total

1.  Does Size Matter? Comparison of Extraction Yields for Different-Sized DNA Fragments by Seven Different Routine and Four New Circulating Cell-Free Extraction Methods.

Authors:  Linda Cook; Kimberly Starr; Jerry Boonyaratanakornkit; Randall Hayden; Soya S Sam; Angela M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The Ratio of ssDNA to dsDNA in Circulating Cell-Free DNA Extract is a Stable Indicator for Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Xuewen Huang; Qi Zhao; Xianyuan An; Jie Pan; Lanjing Zhao; Lanfeng Shen; Yiqiu Xu; Dandan Yuan
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  On-chip isolation and enrichment of circulating cell-free DNA using microfluidic device.

Authors:  Hogyeong Gwak; Junmoo Kim; Sunyeong Cha; Yong-Pil Cheon; Seung-Il Kim; Bongseop Kwak; Kyung-A Hyun; Hyo-Il Jung
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA from Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Gabriela Marsavela; Anna Reid; Elin S Gray; Leslie Calapre
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  An automated, high-throughput methodology optimized for quantitative cell-free mitochondrial and nuclear DNA isolation from plasma.

Authors:  Sarah A Ware; Nikita Desai; Mabel Lopez; Daniel Leach; Yingze Zhang; Luca Giordano; Mehdi Nouraie; Martin Picard; Brett A Kaufman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Using Digital Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Anne Macgregor-Das; Jun Yu; Koji Tamura; Toshiya Abe; Masaya Suenaga; Koji Shindo; Michael Borges; Chiho Koi; Shiro Kohi; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Marco Dal Molin; Jose A Almario; Madeline Ford; Miguel Chuidian; Richard Burkhart; Jin He; Ralph H Hruban; James R Eshleman; Alison P Klein; Christopher L Wolfgang; Marcia I Canto; Michael Goggins
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Microfluidic-based solid phase extraction of cell free DNA.

Authors:  Camila D M Campos; Sachindra S T Gamage; Joshua M Jackson; Malgorzata A Witek; Daniel S Park; Michael C Murphy; Andrew K Godwin; Steven A Soper
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 8.  When Tissue is an Issue the Liquid Biopsy is Nonissue: A Review.

Authors:  July Rodríguez; Jenny Avila; Christian Rolfo; Alejandro Ruíz-Patiño; Alessandro Russo; Luisa Ricaurte; Camila Ordóñez-Reyes; Oscar Arrieta; Zyanya Lucia Zatarain-Barrón; Gonzalo Recondo; Andrés F Cardona
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2021-03-10

9.  Characterization of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Integrity Using Droplet-Based Digital PCR: Toward the Development of Circulating Tumor DNA-Dedicated Assays.

Authors:  Geoffroy Poulet; Fanny Garlan; Sonia Garrigou; Eleonora Zonta; Leonor Benhaim; Marie-Jennifer Carrillon; Audrey Didelot; Delphine Le Corre; Claire Mulot; Philippe Nizard; Frederic Ginot; Audrey Boutonnet-Rodat; Helene Blons; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Julien Taïeb; Aziz Zaanan; Vanna Geromel; Laurence Pellegrina; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Shu-Fang Wang-Renault; Valerie Taly
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Homology Recombination Repair Genes in Prostate Cancer: From the Lab to the Clinic.

Authors:  Alessia Cimadamore; Liang Cheng; Francesco Massari; Matteo Santoni; Laura Pepi; Carmine Franzese; Marina Scarpelli; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Andrea Benedetto Galosi; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.