Literature DB >> 27864208

Payer view of personalized medicine.

Edmund J Pezalla1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The process and methods used by payers when evaluating coverage of personalized medicine testing are described.
SUMMARY: Personalized medicine encompasses a number of diagnostic tools that measure drug metabolism, genetic risk for disease development, and tumor type or markers that can guide oncology treatments. However, whole genome testing, tumor marker testing, and testing for drug metabolism are additional costs to the healthcare system. In order to justify these costs, payers and health technology assessment bodies must evaluate the individual tests or groups of tests on their own merits. In order for a test to be covered by payers, test developers must demonstrate clinical utility as measured by improved outcomes or well-informed decision-making. In the United States, payers generally focus on clinical benefit to individual patients and benefits to the healthcare system. Clinical benefits include improved outcomes. Benefits to the healthcare system are generally considered to be cost offsets, which may be due to reductions in the use of unnecessary interventions or to more efficient use of resources. Provider organizations have been assuming more responsibility and liability for healthcare costs through various risk arrangements, including accountable care organizations and patient-centered medical homes. Diagnostic tests that increase efficiency, reduce unnecessary interventions, and improve outcomes will be chosen by specialists in provider organizations.
CONCLUSION: For personalized medicine approaches to be adopted and covered by health plans, the methods must be shown to be analytically and clinically valid and provide clinical utility at a reasonable level of cost-effectiveness to payers.
Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  economics; genomic; insurance; personalized; precision

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27864208     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp160038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  10 in total

1.  Implementation and obstacles of pharmacogenetics in clinical practice: An international survey.

Authors:  Elizabeth Abou Diwan; Ralph I Zeitoun; Lea Abou Haidar; Ingolf Cascorbi; Nathalie Khoueiry Zgheib
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Impact of SLCO1B1 Pharmacogenetic Testing on Patient and Healthcare Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; Sojeong Chun; Sanjay Advani; Sophie A Ludin; Jason G Smith; Elaine C Alligood
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Preemptive pharmacogenetic testing: exploring the knowledge and perspectives of US payers.

Authors:  Nicholas J Keeling; Meagen M Rosenthal; Donna West-Strum; Amit S Patel; Cyrine E Haidar; James M Hoffman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Insights From a Temporal Assessment of Increases in US Private Payer Coverage of Tumor Sequencing From 2015 to 2019.

Authors:  Julia R Trosman; Michael P Douglas; Su-Ying Liang; Christine B Weldon; Allison W Kurian; Robin K Kelley; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 5.  Bridging the Gaps in Personalized Medicine Value Assessment: A Review of the Need for Outcome Metrics across Stakeholders and Scientific Disciplines.

Authors:  William S Bush; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Mark F Beno; Dana C Crawford
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Insurance coverage does not predict outcomes of genetic testing: The search for meaning in payer decisions for germline cancer tests.

Authors:  Laura M Amendola; M Ragan Hart; Robin L Bennett; Martha Horike-Pyne; Michael Dorschner; Brian Shirts; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  The Integrating Pharmacogenetics in Clinical Care (I-PICC) Study: Protocol for a point-of-care randomized controlled trial of statin pharmacogenetics in primary care.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; Charles A Brunette; Nilla Majahalme; Sanjay Advani; Lauren MacMullen; Cynthia Hau; Andrew J Zimolzak; Stephen J Miller
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Preemptive pharmacogenetic testing: exploring the knowledge and perspectives of US payers.

Authors:  Nicholas J Keeling; Meagen M Rosenthal; Donna West-Strum; Amit S Patel; Cyrine E Haidar; James M Hoffman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Pharmacogenomic Testing In Pediatrics: Navigating The Ethical, Social, And Legal Challenges.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2019-10-14

10.  Development of Customizable Implementation Guides to Support Clinical Adoption of Pharmacogenomics: Experiences of the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) Network.

Authors:  Benjamin Q Duong; Meghan J Arwood; J Kevin Hicks; Amber L Beitelshees; Francesco Franchi; John T Houder; Nita A Limdi; Kelsey J Cook; Aniwaa Owusu Obeng; Natasha Petry; Sony Tuteja; Amanda R Elsey; Larisa H Cavallari; Kristin Wiisanen
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2020-07-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.