Literature DB >> 27864178

Microbial Nursery Production of High-Quality Biological Soil Crust Biomass for Restoration of Degraded Dryland Soils.

Sergio Velasco Ayuso1, Ana Giraldo Silva1,2, Corey Nelson1,2, Nichole N Barger3, Ferran Garcia-Pichel4,2.   

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are slow-growing, phototroph-based microbial assemblages that develop on the topsoils of drylands. Biocrusts help maintain soil fertility and reduce erosion. Because their loss through human activities has negative ecological and environmental health consequences, biocrust restoration is of interest. Active soil inoculation with biocrust microorganisms can be an important tool in this endeavor. We present a culture-independent, two-step process to grow multispecies biocrusts in open greenhouse nursery facilities, based on the inoculation of local soils with local biocrust remnants and incubation under seminatural conditions that maintain the essence of the habitat but lessen its harshness. In each of four U.S. Southwest sites, we tested and deployed combinations of factors that maximized growth (gauged as chlorophyll a content) while minimizing microbial community shifts (assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing and bioinformatics), particularly for crust-forming cyanobacteria. Generally, doubling the frequency of natural wetting events, a 60% reduction in sunlight, and inoculation by slurry were optimal. Nutrient addition effects were site specific. In 4 months, our approach yielded crusts of high inoculum quality reared on local soil exposed to locally matched climates, acclimated to desiccation, and containing communities minimally shifted in composition from local ones. Our inoculum contained abundant crust-forming cyanobacteria and no significant numbers of allochthonous phototrophs, and it was sufficient to treat ca. 6,000 m2 of degraded dryland soils at 1 to 5% of the typical crust biomass concentration, having started from a natural crust remnant as small as 6 to 30 cm2 IMPORTANCE: Soil surface crusts can protect dryland soils from erosion, but they are often negatively impacted by human activities. Their degradation causes a loss of fertility, increased production of fugitive dust and intensity of dust storms with associated traffic problems, and provokes general public health hazards. Our results constitute an advance in the quest to actively restore biological soil covers by providing a means to obtain high-quality inoculum within a reasonable time (a few months), thereby allowing land managers to recover essential, but damaged, ecosystem services in a sustainable, self-perpetuating way as provided by biocrust communities.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; biological soil crusts; cyanobacteria; degraded soils; drylands; erosion control; soil microbiome; soil restoration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27864178      PMCID: PMC5244311          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02179-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  36 in total

1.  Temperature drives the continental-scale distribution of key microbes in topsoil communities.

Authors:  Ferran Garcia-Pichel; Virginia Loza; Yevgeniy Marusenko; Pilar Mateo; Ruth M Potrafka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Solar ultraviolet and the evolutionary history of cyanobacteria.

Authors:  F Garcia-Pichel
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  Aligning short reads to reference alignments and trees.

Authors:  Simon A Berger; Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophylls a and b and their pheophytins in ethanol.

Authors:  J F Wintermans; A de Mots
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1965-11-29

5.  MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Christian L Lauber; William A Walters; Donna Berg-Lyons; James Huntley; Noah Fierer; Sarah M Owens; Jason Betley; Louise Fraser; Markus Bauer; Niall Gormley; Jack A Gilbert; Geoff Smith; Rob Knight
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Isolation of a significant fraction of non-phototroph diversity from a desert Biological Soil Crust.

Authors:  Ulisses Nunes da Rocha; Hinsby Cadillo-Quiroz; Ulas Karaoz; Lara Rajeev; Niels Klitgord; Sean Dunn; Viet Truong; Mayra Buenrostro; Benjamin P Bowen; Ferran Garcia-Pichel; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay; Trent R Northen; Eoin L Brodie
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Response of biological soil crust diazotrophs to season, altered summer precipitation, and year-round increased temperature in an arid grassland of the colorado plateau, USA.

Authors:  Chris M Yeager; Cheryl R Kuske; Travis D Carney; Shannon L Johnson; Lawrence O Ticknor; Jayne Belnap
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Light structures phototroph, bacterial and fungal communities at the soil surface.

Authors:  Lawrence O Davies; Hendrik Schäfer; Samantha Marshall; Irene Bramke; Robin G Oliver; Gary D Bending
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dynamic cyanobacterial response to hydration and dehydration in a desert biological soil crust.

Authors:  Lara Rajeev; Ulisses Nunes da Rocha; Niels Klitgord; Eric G Luning; Julian Fortney; Seth D Axen; Patrick M Shih; Nicholas J Bouskill; Benjamin P Bowen; Cheryl A Kerfeld; Ferran Garcia-Pichel; Eoin L Brodie; Trent R Northen; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 10.302

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Fog-Irrigated Soil Substrate System Unifies and Optimizes Cyanobacterial Biocrust Inoculum Production.

Authors:  Corey Nelson; Ana Giraldo-Silva; Ferran Garcia-Pichel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Insights into dryland biocrust microbiome: geography, soil depth and crust type affect biocrust microbial communities and networks in Mojave Desert, USA.

Authors:  Nuttapon Pombubpa; Nicole Pietrasiak; Paul De Ley; Jason E Stajich
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  Beneficial Cyanosphere Heterotrophs Accelerate Establishment of Cyanobacterial Biocrust.

Authors:  Corey Nelson; Ferran Garcia-Pichel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Spatial segregation of the biological soil crust microbiome around its foundational cyanobacterium, Microcoleus vaginatus, and the formation of a nitrogen-fixing cyanosphere.

Authors:  Estelle Couradeau; Ana Giraldo-Silva; Francesca De Martini; Ferran Garcia-Pichel
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 14.650

5.  Optimizing the Production of Nursery-Based Biological Soil Crusts for Restoration of Arid Land Soils.

Authors:  Julie Bethany; Ana Giraldo-Silva; Corey Nelson; Nichole N Barger; Ferran Garcia-Pichel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The Compositionally Distinct Cyanobacterial Biocrusts From Brazilian Savanna and Their Environmental Drivers of Community Diversity.

Authors:  Náthali Maria Machado-de-Lima; Vanessa Moreira Câmara Fernandes; Daniel Roush; Sergio Velasco Ayuso; Janaina Rigonato; Ferran Garcia-Pichel; Luis Henrique Zanini Branco
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Ecological Function and Impact on Soil Aggregation.

Authors:  Ohana Y A Costa; Jos M Raaijmakers; Eiko E Kuramae
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.