Literature DB >> 27863856

Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark.

Jong-Eun Kim1, Ami Amelya2, Yooseok Shin3, June-Sung Shim4.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Intraoral scanners have been reported to have limited accuracy in edentulous areas. Large amounts of mobile tissue and the lack of obvious anatomic landmarks make it difficult to acquire a precise digital impression of an edentulous area with an intraoral scanner.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of an artificial landmark on a long edentulous space on the accuracy outcomes of intraoral digital impressions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A mandibular model containing 4 prepared teeth and an edentulous space of 26 mm in length was used. A blue-light light-emitting diode tabletop scanner was used as a control scanner, and 3 intraoral scanners were used as experimental groups. Five scans were made using each intraoral scanner without an artificial landmark, and another 5 scans were performed after application of an artificial landmark (a 4×3 mm alumina material) on the edentulous area. The obtained datasets were used to evaluate trueness and precision.
RESULTS: Without an artificial landmark on the edentulous area, the mean trueness for the intraoral scanner ranged from 36.1 to 38.8 μm and the mean precision ranged from 13.0 to 43.6 μm. With an artificial landmark on the edentulous area, accuracy was improved significantly: the mean trueness was 26.7 to 31.8 μm, and the mean precision was 9.2 to 12.4 μm.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of an alumina artificial landmark in an edentulous space improved the trueness and precision of the intraoral scanners tested.
Copyright © 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27863856     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  13 in total

1.  The effect of the improperly scanned scan body images on the accuracy of virtual implant positioning in computer-aided design software.

Authors:  Se-Won Park; Yong-Do Choi; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions.

Authors:  Priscilla Medina-Sotomayor; Agustín Pascual-Moscardó; Isabel Camps
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Repeatability of Intraoral Scanners for Complete Arch Scan of Partially Edentulous Dentitions: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Lee; Je-Hyeon Yun; Jung-Suk Han; In-Sung Luke Yeo; Hyung-In Yoon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Clinical Evaluation of Time Efficiency and Fit Accuracy of Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns between Conventional and Digital Impression.

Authors:  Ji-Su Park; Young-Jun Lim; Bongju Kim; Myung-Joo Kim; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  The Effect of Perioral Scan and Artificial Skin Markers on the Accuracy of Virtual Dentofacial Integration: Stereophotogrammetry Versus Smartphone Three-Dimensional Face-Scanning.

Authors:  Hang-Nga Mai; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  María Isabel Albanchez-González; Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann; Jesús Peláez-Rico; Carlos López-Suárez; Verónica Rodríguez-Alonso; María Jesús Suárez-García
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Bias Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Extraoral Scanners and an Intraoral Scanner Based on ADA Standards.

Authors:  Naiyu Cui; Jiayin Wang; Xingyu Hou; Shixun Sun; Qixuan Huang; Ho-Kyung Lim; HongXin Cai; Qi Jia; Eui-Seok Lee; Heng Bo Jiang
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 1.932

Review 8.  Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression: A review.

Authors:  Kanchan Aswani; Sattyam Wankhade; Arun Khalikar; Suryakant Deogade
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-01-27

9.  Applying intraoral scanner to residual ridge in edentulous regions: in vitro evaluation of inter-operator validity to confirm trueness.

Authors:  Akinori Tasaka; Yuuki Uekubo; Tomoharu Mitsui; Takao Kasahara; Takuya Takanashi; Shinya Homma; Satoru Matsunaga; Shinichi Abe; Masao Yoshinari; Yasutomo Yajima; Kaoru Sakurai; Shuichiro Yamashita
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Accuracy on Scanned Images of Full Arch Models with Orthodontic Brackets by Various Intraoral Scanners in the Presence of Artificial Saliva.

Authors:  Jihu Song; Minji Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.