Literature DB >> 27862788

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: continued refinement of outcomes beyond the initial learning curve.

David J Paulucci1, Ronney Abaza2, Daniel D Eun3, Ashok K Hemal4, Ketan K Badani1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate trends in peri-operative outcomes of 250 consecutive cases beyond the initial learning curve (LC) of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) among multiple surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional database was used to evaluate trends in patient demographics (e.g. age, gender, comorbidities), tumour characteristics (e.g. size, complexity) and peri-operative outcomes (e.g. warm ischaemia time [WIT], operating time, complications, estimated blood loss [EBL], trifecta achievement) in consecutive cases 50-300 (n = 960) from 2008 to 2016 among four experienced surgeons. Trends in outcomes were assessed using multivariable regression models adjusted for demographic and tumour-specific variables. Outcomes for cases 50-99 were compared with those for cases 250-300.
RESULTS: In the study period RAPN was increasingly performed in patients with larger tumours (β = 0.001, P = 0.048), hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1.003; P = 0.008) diabetes (OR 1.003; P = 0.025) and previous abdominal surgery (OR 1.003; P = 0.006). Surgeon experience was associated with more trifecta achievement (OR 1.006; P < 0.001), shorter WIT (β = -0.036, P < 0.001), less EBL (β = -0.154, P = 0.009), fewer blood transfusions (OR 0.989, P = 0.024) and a reduced length of hospital stay (β = -0.002, P = 0.002), but not with operating time (P = 0.243), complications (P = 0.587) or surgical margin status (P = 0.102). Tumour size and WIT in cases 50-99 vs 250-300 were 2.7 vs 3.2 cm (P = 0.001) and 21.4 vs 16.2 min (P < 0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Refinement of RAPN outcomes, concomitant with the treatment of a patient population with larger tumours and more comorbidities, occurs after the initial LC is reached. Although RAPN can consistently be performed safely with acceptable outcomes after a small number of cases, improvement in trifecta achievement, WIT, EBL, blood transfusions and a shorter hospitalization continues to occur up to 300 procedures.
© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #KCSM; #KidneyCancer; learning curve; robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; trends; warm ischaemia time

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27862788     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

Review 1.  The safety of urologic robotic surgery depends on the skills of the surgeon.

Authors:  Erika Palagonia; Elio Mazzone; Geert De Naeyer; Frederiek D'Hondt; Justin Collins; Pawel Wisz; Fijs W B Van Leeuwen; Henk Van Der Poel; Peter Schatteman; Alexandre Mottrie; Paolo Dell'Oglio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Factors Associated With Receipt of Partial Nephrectomy or Minimally Invasive Surgery for Patients With Clinical T1a and T1b Renal Masses: Implications for Regionalization of Care.

Authors:  Joshua Sterling; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Hiren V Patel; Nicholas J Farber; Sinae Kim; Kushan D Radadia; Parth K Modi; Sharad Goyal; Rahul Parikh; Robert E Weiss; Isaac Y Kim; Sammy E Elsamra; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of perioperative course and postoperative outcome after 1 year.

Authors:  Anthony Yang; Naman Barman; Edward Chin; Daniel Herron; Antonios Arvelakis; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Sander S Florman; Michael A Palese
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

5.  Surgeon preference of surgical approach for partial nephrectomy in patients with baseline chronic kidney disease: a nationwide population-based analysis in the USA.

Authors:  Yash S Khandwala; In Gab Jeong; Deok Hyun Han; Jae Heon Kim; Shufeng Li; Ye Wang; Steven L Chang; Benjamin I Chung
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Early Single-Center Experience with Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Using the da Vinci Xi: Comparative Assessment with Conventional Open Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Motoyama; Ryota Aki; Yuto Matsushita; Keita Tamura; Toshiki Ito; Takayuki Sugiyama; Atsushi Otsuka; Hideaki Miyake
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-09-10

7.  Retroperitoneal single-site robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using Lapsingle Vision advanced access platform: initial three case reports.

Authors:  Hyung Ho Lee; Young Eun Yoon; Young Sig Kim; Joon Chae Na; Koon Ho Rha; Woong Kyu Han; Dae Keun Kim
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

8.  Operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy. A report of the first 101 cases from a single center in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Raouf M Seyam; Mohammed M Alalawi; Waleed K Alkhudair; Hassan M Alzahrani; Raed A Azhar; Khalid I Alothman; Turki O Al-Hussain; Mohammed F Alotaibi
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  Three Different Learning Curves Have an Independent Impact on Perioperative Outcomes After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Philip Zeuschner; Irmengard Meyer; Stefan Siemer; Michael Stoeckle; Gudrun Wagenpfeil; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Matthias Saar; Martin Janssen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Impact of learning curve on the perioperative outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors.

Authors:  Brendan Hermenigildo Dias; Mohammed Shahid Ali; Shiv Dubey; Srinivas Arkalgud Krishnaswamy; Amrith Raj Rao; Deepak Dubey
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.