Literature DB >> 2786060

The white-coat hypertension response: prevalence and predictors.

C E Lerman1, D S Brody, T Hui, C Lazaro, D G Smith, M J Blum.   

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the clinical characteristics of hypertensive patients whose blood pressures are substantially higher in the medical office than in their natural environments. Thirty-nine percent of patients enrolled in a nonpharmacologic hypertension treatment program had systolic or diastolic office blood pressures (OBPs) that were at least 10 mm Hg higher than their ambulatory blood pressures (ABPs). Although these white-coat responders (WCRs) had higher systolic OBPs than did non-white-coat responders (NRs), both their systolic (p less than 0.02) and their diastolic (p less than 0.0001) ABPs were significantly lower than those of NRs. Furthermore, patients with white-coat hypertension did not have greater blood pressure reactivity in their natural environments, suggesting that their blood pressure elevations may be specific to the medical setting. White-coat hypertensives were older (p less than 0.005), had less angry dispositions (p less than 0.01), and reported less overt anger expression (p less than 0.005). They were also taking more antihypertensive medications than were the other patients in the study (p less than 0.001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2786060     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  15 in total

1.  How common is white coat hypertension?

Authors:  T G Pickering; G D James; C Boddie; G A Harshfield; S Blank; J H Laragh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-01-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Role of blood pressure in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  W B Kannel
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1974 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

3.  Comparison of clinic and home blood pressure levels in essential hypertension and variables associated with clinic-home differences.

Authors:  K D Laughlin; D J Sherrard; L Fisher
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1980

4.  The role of anger and hostility in essential hypertension and coronary heart disease.

Authors:  E L Diamond
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Relationship between level of blood pressure measured casually and by portable recorders and severity of complications in essential hypertension.

Authors:  M Sokolow; D Werdegar; H K Kain; A T Hinman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Usefulness of home BP determination in treating borderline hypertension.

Authors:  C Cottier; S Julius; S V Gajendragadkar; M A Schork
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-08-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Five-year findings of the hypertension detection and follow-up program. I. Reduction in mortality of persons with high blood pressure, including mild hypertension. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A study of comparative blood pressure measures in predicting risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  R H Rosenman; R I Sholtz; R J Brand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Anger, anxiety, guilt and increased basal and stress-induced neurogenic tone: causes or effects in primary hypertension?

Authors:  P A Sullivan; W R Procci; V DeQuattro; S Schoentgen; D Levine; J van der Meulen; J F Bornheimer
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 6.124

10.  Anger and anxiety in borderline hypertension.

Authors:  R H Schneider; B M Egan; E H Johnson; H Drobny; S Julius
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  What do you do when the blood pressure is up? An approach to the known hypertensive who has an elevated blood pressure.

Authors:  R L Schiff; M H Cohen; A Balson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Resistant hypertension.

Authors:  David A Calhoun; Mohammad A Zaman; Mari K Nishizaka
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  T G Pickering
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Prevalence and predictors of white-coat response in patients with treated hypertension.

Authors:  M B MacDonald; G P Laing; M P Wilson; T W Wilson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-08-10       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Predictors of the pressor response to the clinic visit in essential hypertensives with and without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  C L Laffer; F Elijovich
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 6.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 2. Diagnosis of hypertension in adults.

Authors:  R B Haynes; Y Lacourcière; S W Rabkin; F H Leenen; A G Logan; N Wright; C E Evans
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Home blood pressure monitoring for mild hypertensives.

Authors:  L T Midanik; B Resnick; L B Hurley; E J Smith; M McCarthy
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 8.  Withdrawal of antihypertensive therapy in the elderly. The issues.

Authors:  M D Fotherby
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Confounders of auscultatory blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  R H Baker; J Ende
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  No evidence that panic attacks are associated with the white coat effect in hypertension.

Authors:  S J C Davies; P R Jackson; L E Ramsay; P Ghahramani; R L Palmer; J Hippisley-Cox
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.