Literature DB >> 27859193

The importance of motivation, weapons, and foul odors in driving encounter competition in carnivores.

Maximilian L Allen1,2,3, Christopher C Wilmers1, L Mark Elbroch4, Julie M Golla5, Heiko U Wittmer2.   

Abstract

Encounter competition is interference competition in which animals directly contend for resources. Ecological theory predicts the trait that determines the resource holding potential (RHP), and hence the winner of encounter competition, is most often body size or mass. The difficulties of observing encounter competition in complex organisms in natural environments, however, has limited opportunities to test this theory across diverse species. We studied the outcome of encounter competition contests among mesocarnivores at deer carcasses in California to determine the most important variables for winning these contests. We found some support for current theory in that body mass is important in determining the winner of encounter competition, but we found that other factors including hunger and species-specific traits were also important. In particular, our top models were "strength and hunger" and "size and hunger," with models emphasizing the complexity of variables influencing outcomes of encounter competition. In addition, our wins above predicted (WAP) statistic suggests that an important aspect that determines the winner of encounter competition is species-specific advantages that increase their RHP, as bobcats (Lynx rufus) and spotted skunks (Spilogale gracilis) won more often than predicted based on mass. In complex organisms, such as mesocarnivores, species-specific adaptations, including strategic behaviors, aggressiveness, and weapons, contribute to competitive advantages and may allow certain species to take control or defend resources better than others. Our results help explain how interspecific competition shapes the occurrence patterns of species in ecological communities.
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  California; carrion; encounter competition; foraging arenas; interference competition; interspecific interactions; mesocarnivore

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27859193     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  2 in total

1.  Hunter selection for larger and older male bobcats affects annual harvest demography.

Authors:  Maximilian L Allen; Nathan M Roberts; Timothy R Van Deelen
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.963

2.  Are pumas subordinate carnivores, and does it matter?

Authors:  L Mark Elbroch; Anna Kusler
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.