Literature DB >> 27859126

Unifying error structures in commonly used biotracer mixing models.

Brian C Stock1, Brice X Semmens1.   

Abstract

Mixing models are statistical tools that use biotracers to probabilistically estimate the contribution of multiple sources to a mixture. These biotracers may include contaminants, fatty acids, or stable isotopes, the latter of which are widely used in trophic ecology to estimate the mixed diet of consumers. Bayesian implementations of mixing models using stable isotopes (e.g., MixSIR, SIAR) are regularly used by ecologists for this purpose, but basic questions remain about when each is most appropriate. In this study, we describe the structural differences between common mixing model error formulations in terms of their assumptions about the predation process. We then introduce a new parameterization that unifies these mixing model error structures, as well as implicitly estimates the rate at which consumers sample from source populations (i.e., consumption rate). Using simulations and previously published mixing model datasets, we demonstrate that the new error parameterization outperforms existing models and provides an estimate of consumption. Our results suggest that the error structure introduced here will improve future mixing model estimates of animal diet.
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990SIARzzm321990; Bayesian; MixSIR; biotracers; fatty acid; mixing model; stable isotope

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27859126     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  25 in total

1.  Terrestrial-aquatic trophic linkages support fish production in a tropical oligotrophic river.

Authors:  Sandra Bibiana Correa; Kirk Winemiller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Quantifying learning in biotracer studies.

Authors:  Christopher J Brown; Michael T Brett; Maria Fernanda Adame; Ben Stewart-Koster; Stuart E Bunn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Isotopic niche partitioning and individual specialization in an Arctic raptor guild.

Authors:  Devin L Johnson; Michael T Henderson; David L Anderson; Travis L Booms; Cory T Williams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Comparison of Bayesian and numerical optimization-based diet estimation on herbivorous zooplankton.

Authors:  Jaakko J Litmanen; Tommi A Perälä; Sami J Taipale
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Does lipid-correction introduce biases into isotopic mixing models? Implications for diet reconstruction studies.

Authors:  Martin C Arostegui; Daniel E Schindler; Gordon W Holtgrieve
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A new approach for incorporating 15N isotopic data into linear inverse ecosystem models with Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling.

Authors:  Michael R Stukel; Moira Décima; Thomas B Kelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Analyzing mixing systems using a new generation of Bayesian tracer mixing models.

Authors:  Brian C Stock; Andrew L Jackson; Eric J Ward; Andrew C Parnell; Donald L Phillips; Brice X Semmens
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Leopard seal diets in a rapidly warming polar region vary by year, season, sex, and body size.

Authors:  Douglas J Krause; Michael E Goebel; Carolyn M Kurle
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.964

9.  Trophic signatures of seabirds suggest shifts in oceanic ecosystems.

Authors:  Tyler O Gagne; K David Hyrenbach; Molly E Hagemann; Kyle S Van Houtan
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  A deconvolutional Bayesian mixing model approach for river basin sediment source apportionment.

Authors:  William H Blake; Pascal Boeckx; Brian C Stock; Hugh G Smith; Samuel Bodé; Hari R Upadhayay; Leticia Gaspar; Rupert Goddard; Amy T Lennard; Ivan Lizaga; David A Lobb; Philip N Owens; Ellen L Petticrew; Zou Zou A Kuzyk; Bayu D Gari; Linus Munishi; Kelvin Mtei; Amsalu Nebiyu; Lionel Mabit; Ana Navas; Brice X Semmens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.