Literature DB >> 27858472

Approaches to biofilm-associated infections: the need for standardized and relevant biofilm methods for clinical applications.

Matthew Malone1,2, Darla M Goeres3, Iain Gosbell1, Karen Vickery4, Slade Jensen1, Paul Stoodley5,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The concept of biofilms in human health and disease is now widely accepted as cause of chronic infection. Typically, biofilms show remarkable tolerance to many forms of treatments and the host immune response. This has led to vast increase in research to identify new (and sometimes old) anti-biofilm strategies that demonstrate effectiveness against these tolerant phenotypes. Areas covered: Unfortunately, a standardized methodological approach of biofilm models has not been adopted leading to a large disparity between testing conditions. This has made it almost impossible to compare data across multiple laboratories, leaving large gaps in the evidence. Furthermore, many biofilm models testing anti-biofilm strategies aimed at the medical arena have not considered the matter of relevance to an intended application. This may explain why some in vitro models based on methodological designs that do not consider relevance to an intended application fail when applied in vivo at the clinical level. Expert commentary: This review will explore the issues that need to be considered in developing performance standards for anti-biofilm therapeutics and provide a rationale for the need to standardize models/methods that are clinically relevant. We also provide some rational as to why no standards currently exist.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; MBEC; effectiveness; standard methods

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27858472     DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2017.1262257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther        ISSN: 1478-7210            Impact factor:   5.091


  25 in total

1.  Measuring Antimicrobial Efficacy against Biofilms: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart; Albert E Parker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  CORR Insights®: Is Implant Coating With Tyrosol- and Antibiotic-loaded Hydrogel Effective in Reducing Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes Biofilm Formation? A Preliminary In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  CORR Insights®: Does Extracellular DNA Production Vary in Staphylococcal Biofilms Isolated From Infected Implants versus Controls?

Authors:  Devendra H Dusane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Letter to the Editor: CORR Insights®: Does Extracellular DNA Production Vary in Staphylococcal Biofilms Isolated From Infected Implants Versus Controls?

Authors:  Beata Zatorska; Elisabeth Presterl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Combined Anti-Biofilm Enzymes Strengthen the Eradicate Effect of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Biofilm: Mechanism on cpsA-J Expression and Application on Different Carriers.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Ruyue Dong; Lei Ma; Yilin Qian; Zunying Liu
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 6.  Role of anaerobes in polymicrobial communities and biofilms complicating diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Matthew Malone; Dieter Mayer; Anne-Marie Salisbury; Gregory Schultz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Sonobactericide: An Emerging Treatment Strategy for Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  Kirby R Lattwein; Himanshu Shekhar; Joop J P Kouijzer; Willem J B van Wamel; Christy K Holland; Klazina Kooiman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Tolerant Small-colony Variants Form Prior to Resistance Within a Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Based on Antibiotic Selective Pressure.

Authors:  Robert Manasherob; Jake A Mooney; David W Lowenberg; Paul L Bollyky; Derek F Amanatullah
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Evaluation of short exposure times of antimicrobial wound solutions against microbial biofilms: from in vitro to in vivo.

Authors:  K Johani; M Malone; S O Jensen; H G Dickson; I B Gosbell; H Hu; Q Yang; G Schultz; K Vickery
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  The Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with and without Instillation on Mature Biofilms In Vitro.

Authors:  Shamaila Tahir; Matthew Malone; Honghua Hu; Anand Deva; Karen Vickery
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.