Literature DB >> 27858209

Outcomes in patients with over 1-year follow-up after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Marc A Ward1, Matt Gitelis2, Lava Patel2, Yalini Vigneswaran3, Joann Carbray2, Michael B Ujiki3,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a promising therapy in the treatment of achalasia. The study was designed to report outcomes, including quality of life, in patients with at least 1-year follow-up.
METHODS: Patients from an institutional review board-approved protocol underwent POEM and were followed prospectively. Health-related quality of life was measured preoperatively and 1 year post-operatively using Short Form-36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). Comparisons were made with patients from a prospective database who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) over the same period. Paired t tests were used to analyze all normally distributed data, while Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyze SF-36 data, as it does not follow a normal distribution.
RESULTS: We analyzed 41 consecutive POEM patients with at least 1-year follow-up. Significant improvements in quality of life between baseline and 1 year were found in role limitations due to physical health (81.8 ± 25.8 vs. 65.9 ± 31.6, p = 0.01) and social functioning (83 ± 19.1 vs. 64.6 ± 31.3, p = 0.01). When compared to 24 patients who underwent LHM, there was no difference in average Eckardt scores (0.9 ± 1.6 vs. 1.0 ± 1.3, p > 0.05) or incidence of PPI use (43.5 vs. 47.5 %, p = 0.71). However, when looking at just type III patients, POEM patients had a higher remission rate (100 vs. 62.5 %) and significantly lower post-operative Eckardt scores at 1 year (1.1 vs. 3.1, p < 0.05). The average myotomy length of type III achalasia patients undergoing POEM was 18.6 cm (±6.9) compared to 10.3 cm (±1.0) in LHM patients (p < 0.01), which may have contributed to this difference.
CONCLUSION: POEM provides a significant quality of life benefit at 1 year while having similar relief of dysphagia and post-operative PPI use compared to LHM. Type III achalasia patients may have better outcomes with POEM compared to LHM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achalasia; Eckardt score; Laparoscopic Heller myotomy; Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM); Type III achalasia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27858209     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5130-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

1.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniel Von Renteln; Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Paul Fockens; Peter Bauerfeind; Melina C Vassiliou; Yuki B Werner; Gerald Fried; Wolfram Breithaupt; Henriette Heinrich; Albert J Bredenoord; Jan F Kersten; Tessa Verlaan; Michael Trevisonno; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal primary motility disorders: analysis of 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Ahmed M Sharata; Christy M Dunst; Radu Pescarus; Eran Shlomovitz; Aaron J T Wille; Kevin M Reavis; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype.

Authors:  Wout O Rohof; Renato Salvador; Vito Annese; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Stanislas Chaussade; Mario Costantini; J Ignasi Elizalde; Marianne Gaudric; André J Smout; Jan Tack; Olivier R Busch; Giovanni Zaninotto; Guy E Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  A stepwise approach and early clinical experience in peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia and esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Lee L Swanström; Erwin Rieder; Christy M Dunst
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Treatment and surveillance strategies in achalasia: an update.

Authors:  Alexander J Eckardt; Volker F Eckardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Four hundred laparoscopic myotomies for esophageal achalasia: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Giovanni Zaninotto; Mario Costantini; Christian Rizzetto; Lisa Zanatta; Emanuela Guirroli; Giuseppe Portale; Loredana Nicoletti; Francesco Cavallin; Giorgio Battaglia; Alberto Ruol; Ermanno Ancona
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Behavior and analysis of 36-item Short-Form Health Survey data for surgical quality-of-life research.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-05

9.  Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Monika A Kwiatek; Thomas Nealis; William Bulsiewicz; Jennifer Post; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Heller myotomy for achalasia: quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches.

Authors:  M Katilius; V Velanovich
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  7 in total

1.  Gastroparesis managed with peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Jessica S Clothier; Steven G Leeds; Ahmed Ebrahim; Marc A Ward
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-09-23

2.  Using Impedance Planimetry (EndoFLIP) to Evaluate Myotomy and Predict Outcomes After Surgery for Achalasia.

Authors:  Bailey Su; Zachary M Callahan; Stephanie Novak; Kristine Kuchta; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Is peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) more effective than pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca C Dirks; Geoffrey P Kohn; Bethany Slater; Jake Whiteside; Noe A Rodriguez; Salvatore Docimo; Aurora Pryor; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Factors associated with admission after implementation of a same-day discharge pathway in patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Authors:  Mikhail Attaar; Bailey Su; Harry J Wong; Kristine Kuchta; Woody Denham; Stephen P Haggerty; John Linn; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Quality of Life Following Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chunyu Zhong; Shali Tan; Yutang Ren; Muhan Lü; Yan Peng; Xiangsheng Fu; Xiaowei Tang
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 6.  An Updated Meta-analysis: Similar Clinical Efficacy of Anterior and Posterior Approaches in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia.

Authors:  Weina Jing; Xinyue Luo; Jinlin Yang; Junchao Wu; Yuxiang Chen; Kai Deng
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 1.919

7.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs pneumatic dilation (PD) in treatment of achalasia: A meta-analysis of studies with ≥ 12-month follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew Ofosu; Babu P Mohan; Yervant Ichkhanian; Maen Masadeh; John Febin; Mohamed Barakat; Daryl Ramai; Saurabh Chandan; Gulara Haiyeva; Shahab R Khan; Mohamad Aghaie Meybodi; Antonio Facciorusso; Alessandro Repici; Sachin Wani; Nirav Thosani; Mouen A Khashab
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-06-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.