| Literature DB >> 27857189 |
Xueyan Zhou1, Jing Zhu1, Zejun Bao1, Zhenhai Shang1,2, Tao Wang1,2, Jinfang Song1, Juan Sun3, Wei Li3, Temitope Isaac Adelusi1, Yan Wang2, Dongmei Lv2, Qian Lu1, Xiaoxing Yin1.
Abstract
Repaglinide is an insulin secretagogue that often exhibits considerable interindividual variability in therapeutic efficacy. The current study was designed to investigate the impact of KCNQ1 genetic polymorphism on the efficacy of repaglinide and furthermore to identify the potential mechanism of action in patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 305 patients and 200 healthy subjects were genotyped for the KCNQ1 rs2237892 polymorphism, and 82 patients with T2DM were randomized for the oral administration of repaglinide for 8 weeks. HepG2 cells were incubated with repaglinide in the absence or presence of a KCNQ1 inhibitor or the pcDNA3.1-hKCNQ1 plasmid, after which the levels of Akt, IRS-2 and PI(3)K were determined. Our data showed that repaglinide significantly decreased HOMA-IR in patients with T2DM. Furthermore, the level of HOMA-IR was significantly reduced in those patients with CT or TT genotypes than CC homozygotes. The KCNQ1 inhibitor enhanced repaglinide efficacy on insulin resistance, with IRS-2/PI(3)K/Akt signaling being up-regulated markedly. As in our clinical experiment, these data strongly suggest that KCNQ1 genetic polymorphism influences repaglinide response due to the pivotal role of KCNQ1 in regulating insulin resistance through the IRS-2/PI(3)K/Akt signaling pathway. This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register on May 14, 2013. (No. ChiCTR-CCC13003536).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27857189 PMCID: PMC5114551 DOI: 10.1038/srep37293
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical characteristics of patients with T2DM and healthy controls.
| Parameter | Healthy controls (n = 200) | Patients with T2DM (n = 305) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 99 | 165 | |
| Female | 101 | 140 | 0.179b |
| Age (years) | 50.07 ± 6.42 | 48.93 ± 11.89 | 0.250a |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.97 ± 3.31 | 26.10 ± 3.54 | 0.000***a |
| WHR | 0.81 ± 0.06 | 0.91 ± 0.06 | 0.000***a |
| FPG (mmol/l) | 5.10 ± 0.43 | 9.91 ± 2.70 | 0.000***a |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.25 ± 0.42 | 2.57 ± 2.92 | 0.000***a |
| TC (mmol/l) | 4.61 ± 0.74 | 5.27 ± 1.30 | 0.000***a |
| HDL-c (mmol/l) | 1.41 ± 0.16 | 1.43 ± 0.66 | 0.183a |
| LDL-c (mmol/l) | 2.87 ± 0.49 | 3.20 ± 1.07 | 0.000***a |
Data are given as the mean ± SD.
aP values were determined using the Mann-Whitney test.
bP values were determined using Pearson’s χ2 test; all other P values were assessed using independent-samples t-tests. ***P < 0.001.
Comparison of the distribution of KCNQ1 rs2237892 (C/T) polymorphism frequencies between patients with T2DM and healthy controls.
| Genotype | Healthy controls (n = 200) (frequency) | Patients with T2DM (N = 305) (frequency) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC | 72 (36.00%) | 148 (48.52%) | |
| CT | 102 (51.00%) | 136 (44.59%) | |
| TT | 26 (13.00%) | 21 (6.89%) | 0.006** |
| Alleles | |||
| C | 246 (61.50%) | 432 (70.82%) | |
| T | 154 (38.50%) | 178 (29.18%) | 0.002** |
The allelic frequencies are indicated in absolute values (percentage). P values were determined using Pearson’s χ2 test. **P < 0.01.
Baseline characteristics of patients with T2DM with various KCNQ1 rs2237892 (C/T) genotypes before the administration of repaglinide (n = 305).
| Parameter | CC (n = 148) | CT/TT (n = 157) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 90 | 95 | |
| Female | 58 | 62 | 0.957b |
| Age (years) | 49.10 ± 10.68 | 48.78 ± 12.93 | 0.812 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.71 ± 3.22 | 26.47 ± 3.79 | 0.109c |
| WHR | 0.91 ± 0.07 | 0.91 ± 0.06 | 0.901c |
| FPG (mM) | 9.95 ± 2.62 | 9.88 ± 2.78 | 0.614c |
| PPG (mM) | 16.52 ± 4.47 | 16.20 ± 4.81 | 0.162c |
| FINS (mU/l) | 9.99 ± 6.90 | 13.93 ± 13.82 | 0.014* |
| PINS (mU/l) | 37.81 ± 46.19 | 57.37 ± 66.45 | 0.002**c |
| HOMA-IR | 4.24 ± 2.71 | 5.67 ± 4.92 | 0.046*c |
| HbA1c (%) | 9.42 ± 1.85 | 9.16 ± 2.28 | 0.02*c |
| TG (mM) | 2.49 ± 3.19 | 2.64 ± 2.66 | 0.182c |
| TC (mmol/l) | 5.25 ± 1.33 | 5.29 ± 1.27 | 0.629c |
| HDL-c (mM) | 1.43 ± 0.52 | 1.36 ± 0.45 | 0.128c |
| LDL-c (mM) | 3.19 ± 1.12 | 3.21 ± 1.04 | 0.971c |
Data are given as the mean ± SD.
bP values were determined using Pearson’s χ2 test.
cP values were determined using the Mann-Whitney test; all other P values were assessed using independent-samples t-tests. *P < 0.05,**P < 0.01.
Clinical characteristics of all patients with T2DM before and after repaglinide treatment (n = 82).
| Parameter | Before | After | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPG (mM) | 10.32 ± 2.53 | 7.19 ± 1.56 | 0.000***b |
| PPG (mM) | 17.38 ± 4.61 | 11.11 ± 3.22 | 0.000***b |
| FINS (mU/l) | 9.10 ± 7.90 | 10.47 ± 8.93 | 0.005**b |
| PINS (mU/l) | 38.99 ± 50.63 | 52.50 ± 54.60 | 0.000***b |
| HOMA-IR | 3.90 ± 2.89 | 3.30 ± 2.87 | 0.002***b |
| HbA1c (%) | 9. 80 ± 2.06 | 7.12 ± 0.99 | 0.000***b |
| TG (mM) | 2.22 ± 1.97 | 1.89 ± 1.74 | 0.077b |
| TC (mM) | 5.19 ± 1.47 | 4.83 ± 1.07 | 0.026*b |
| HDL-c (mM) | 1.45 ± 0.65 | 1.37 ± 0.53 | 0.382b |
| LDL-c (mM) | 3.10 ± 1.20 | 3.03 ± 1.02 | 0.653 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. P values were determined using paired-samples t-tests.
bP values were determined using the Wilcoxon test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Comparisons of differential values (post administration minus pre administration) in patients with T2DM with different KCNQ1 rs2237892 (C > T) genotypes before and after repaglinide treatment.
| Parameter | CC (n = 44) | CT/TT (n = 38) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 26 | 22 | |
| Female | 18 | 16 | 0.913b |
| FPG (mM) | −2.38 ± 1.90 | −4.04 ± 2.85 | 0.003** |
| PPG (mM) | −5.79 ± 4.12 | −6.83 ± 5.00 | 0.003** |
| FINS (mU/l) | 1.83 ± 6.57 | 0.86 ± 4.32 | 0.731c |
| PINS (mU/l) | 4.19 ± 50.36 | 24.30 ± 35.85 | 0.026* |
| HOMA-IR | −0.10 ± 2.72 | −1.18 ± 2.05 | 0.041*c |
| HbA1c (%) | −2.29 ± 1.66 | −3.14 ± 1.77 | 0.014*c |
| TG (mM) | −0.30 ± 2.20 | −0.36 ± 1.55 | 0.622c |
| TC (mM) | −0.21 ± 1.15 | −0.54 ± 1.68 | 0.440c |
| HDL-c (mM) | −0.12 ± 0.82 | −0.03 ± 0.71 | 0.672c |
| LDL-c (mM) | 0.14 ± 1.05 | −0.30 ± 1.44 | 0.000*** |
Data are given as the mean ± SD.
bP values were determined using Pearson’s χ2 test.
cP values were determined using the Mann-Whitney test; all other P values were assessed using independent-samples t-tests. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 1Effects of KCNQ1 on insulin signaling in HepG2 cells.
(a,c) Histograms showing the consumption of extracellular glucose. (b) HepG2 cells were treated with chromanol 293B (10−1 mM) for 12 h. A representative western blot of IRS-2, PI(3)K, p-Akt (ser473), Akt, and β-actin levels is shown. (d) HepG2 cells were transfected for 6 h with a mixture of the plasmid and PEI. A representative western blot of IRS-2, PI(3)K, p-Akt (ser473), Akt, and β-actin levels is shown. The scanning densitometry results (n = 3) are expressed as arbitrary units. Columns and bars represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, vs Con.
Figure 2Effect of KCNQ1 inhibitor on insulin signal transduction in the IR model.
(a) Histograms showing quantification of the consumption of extracellular glucose. (b–d) HepG2 cells were cultured in DMEM (25 mM glucose). Serum-starved cells were treated with 10−3 mM insulin for 6 h before exposure to chromanol 293B (293B, 10−1 mM) for 12 h. The extracts were immunoblotted with anti-IRS-2, anti-PI(3)K and anti-phospho-Akt. The scanning densitometry results (n = 3) are expressed as arbitrary units. Columns and bars represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, Con vs IR; #p < 0.05, IR vs IR + 293B.
Figure 3KCNQ1 controls repaglinide therapeutic efficacy through the IRS-2/PI(3)K/Akt signaling pathway.
HepG2 cells were cultured in DMEM (25 mM glucose). Serum-starved cells were treated with 10−3 mM insulin for 6 h before exposure to repaglinide (Rep, 10−1 mM) with or without chromanol 293B (293B, 10−1 mM) for 12 h. (a) Enzymatic methods were used to assay for glucose. (b–d) Extracts were immunoblotted with anti-IRS-2, anti-PI(3)K and anti-phospho-Akt. The scanning densitometry results (n = 3) are expressed as arbitrary units. Columns and bars represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, Con vs IR; #p < 0.05, IR vs IR+Rep; △p < 0.05 IR + Rep vs IR + Rep + 293B.