Literature DB >> 27856736

Effect of holding office on the behavior of politicians.

Daniel Enemark1, Clark C Gibson2, Mathew D McCubbins3, Brigitte Seim4.   

Abstract

Reciprocity is central to our understanding of politics. Most political exchanges-whether they involve legislative vote trading, interbranch bargaining, constituent service, or even the corrupt exchange of public resources for private wealth-require reciprocity. But how does reciprocity arise? Do government officials learn reciprocity while holding office, or do recruitment and selection practices favor those who already adhere to a norm of reciprocity? We recruit Zambian politicians who narrowly won or lost a previous election to play behavioral games that provide a measure of reciprocity. This combination of regression discontinuity and experimental designs allows us to estimate the effect of holding office on behavior. We find that holding office increases adherence to the norm of reciprocity. This study identifies causal effects of holding office on politicians' behavior.

Keywords:  behavioral games; corruption; legislative bargaining; reciprocity; regression discontinuity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27856736      PMCID: PMC5137731          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1511501113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  11 in total

1.  Homo reciprocans.

Authors:  Samuel Bowles; Herbert Gintis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies.

Authors:  Cameron Anderson; Berdahl L Jennifer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-12

3.  Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior.

Authors:  Katherine A DeCelles; D Scott DeRue; Joshua D Margolis; Tara L Ceranic
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2012-01-16

4.  Costly punishment across human societies.

Authors:  Joseph Henrich; Richard McElreath; Abigail Barr; Jean Ensminger; Clark Barrett; Alexander Bolyanatz; Juan Camilo Cardenas; Michael Gurven; Edwins Gwako; Natalie Henrich; Carolyn Lesorogol; Frank Marlowe; David Tracer; John Ziker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  God is watching you: priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game.

Authors:  Azim F Shariff; Ara Norenzayan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-09

6.  Reciprocity is not give and take: asymmetric reciprocity to positive and negative acts.

Authors:  Boaz Keysar; Benjamin A Converse; Jiunwen Wang; Nicholas Epley
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

7.  Altruistic punishment in humans.

Authors:  Ernst Fehr; Simon Gächter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Altruistic punishment and the origin of cooperation.

Authors:  James H Fowler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Do infants have a sense of fairness?

Authors:  Stephanie Sloane; Renée Baillargeon; David Premack
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-01-17

10.  The oxytocin receptor (OXTR) contributes to prosocial fund allocations in the dictator game and the social value orientations task.

Authors:  Salomon Israel; Elad Lerer; Idan Shalev; Florina Uzefovsky; Mathias Riebold; Efrat Laiba; Rachel Bachner-Melman; Anat Maril; Gary Bornstein; Ariel Knafo; Richard P Ebstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bound to the group and blinded by the leader: ideological leader-follower dynamics in a trust economic game.

Authors:  Biljana Gjoneska; Marco Tullio Liuzza; Giuseppina Porciello; Gian Vittorio Caprara; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.963

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.