Literature DB >> 22250668

Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior.

Katherine A DeCelles1, D Scott DeRue, Joshua D Margolis, Tara L Ceranic.   

Abstract

Does power corrupt a moral identity, or does it enable a moral identity to emerge? Drawing from the power literature, we propose that the psychological experience of power, although often associated with promoting self-interest, is associated with greater self-interest only in the presence of a weak moral identity. Furthermore, we propose that the psychological experience of power is associated with less self-interest in the presence of a strong moral identity. Across a field survey of working adults and in a lab experiment, individuals with a strong moral identity were less likely to act in self-interest, yet individuals with a weak moral identity were more likely to act in self-interest, when subjectively experiencing power. Finally, we predict and demonstrate an explanatory mechanism behind this effect: The psychological experience of power enhances moral awareness among those with a strong moral identity, yet decreases the moral awareness among those with a weak moral identity. In turn, individuals' moral awareness affects how they behave in relation to their self-interest. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22250668     DOI: 10.1037/a0026811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  11 in total

1.  Effect of holding office on the behavior of politicians.

Authors:  Daniel Enemark; Clark C Gibson; Mathew D McCubbins; Brigitte Seim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Masks as a moral symbol: Masks reduce wearers' deviant behavior in China during COVID-19.

Authors:  Jackson G Lu; Lesley Luyang Song; Yuhuang Zheng; Laura Changlan Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Prevention for oneself or others? Psychological and social factors that explain social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Natalie Christner; Regina M Sticker; Lena Söldner; Maria Mammen; Markus Paulus
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2020-12-10

4.  Out of control!? How loss of self-control influences prosocial behavior: the role of power and moral values.

Authors:  Anne Joosten; Marius van Dijke; Alain Van Hiel; David De Cremer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Do the Powerful Discount the Future Less? The Effects of Power on Temporal Discounting.

Authors:  Jinyun Duan; Sherry J Wu; Luying Sun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-21

6.  When those who know do share: Group goals facilitate information sharing, but social power does not undermine it.

Authors:  Annika Scholl; Florian Landkammer; Kai Sassenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Leader Humility and Machiavellianism: Investigating the Effects on Followers' Self-Interested and Prosocial Behaviors.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Chen; Wen-Qian Zou; Na-Ting Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-09

8.  How Narcissistic Leaders Impact on Subordinate's Followership During the COVID-19? The Moderating Role of Organizational Identification.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Qun Guo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-15

9.  Bridging Personality and Online Prosocial Behavior: The Roles of Empathy, Moral Identity, and Social Self-Efficacy.

Authors:  Jie Leng; Qingke Guo; Bingqing Ma; Shuyue Zhang; Peng Sun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-22

10.  In-Organization Ethics Power-Allocation Mechanisms and Members' Decision-Making Behavior.

Authors:  Yudan Pang; Xuefeng Wang; Hang Wu; Fanfan Zhang
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.