Literature DB >> 27856569

Personal microbiomes and next-generation sequencing for laboratory-based education.

Mark R Hartman1, Kristin T Harrington1, Candice M Etson1, Matthew B Fierman1, Donna K Slonim2, David R Walt3.   

Abstract

Sequencing and bioinformatics technologies have advanced rapidly in recent years, driven largely by developments in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. Given the increasing importance of these advances, there is a growing need to incorporate concepts and practices relating to NGS into undergraduate and high school science curricula. We believe that direct access to sequencing and bioinformatics will improve the ability of students to understand the information obtained through these increasingly ubiquitous research tools. In this commentary, we discuss approaches and challenges for bringing NGS into the classroom based on our experiences in developing and running a microbiome project in high school and undergraduate courses. We describe strategies for maximizing student engagement through establishing personal relevance and utilizing an inquiry-based structure. Additionally, we address the practical issues of incorporating cutting edge technologies into an established curriculum. Looking forward, we anticipate that NGS educational experiments will become more commonplace as sequencing costs continue to decrease and the workflow becomes more user friendly. © FEMS 2016. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  education; microbiome; next-generation sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27856569      PMCID: PMC5827621          DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnw266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN: 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.742


  15 in total

1.  Plant endophytes as a platform for discovery-based undergraduate science education.

Authors:  Scott A Strobel; Gary A Strobel
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 2.  Participatory Genomic Testing as an Educational Experience.

Authors:  Kathryn B Garber; Katherine M Hyland; Shoumita Dasgupta
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Identifying personal microbiomes using metagenomic codes.

Authors:  Eric A Franzosa; Katherine Huang; James F Meadow; Dirk Gevers; Katherine P Lemon; Brendan J M Bohannan; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Swabbing students: should universities be allowed to facilitate educational DNA testing?

Authors:  Shawneequa L Callier
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  An alternative laboratory designed to address ethical concerns associated with traditional TAS2R38 student genotyping.

Authors:  Michelle L LaBonte; Melissa A Beers
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 1.160

6.  Lessons learned from the introduction of personalized genotyping into a medical school curriculum.

Authors:  David R Walt; Amy Kuhlik; Scott K Epstein; Laurie A Demmer; Meredith Knight; David Chelmow; Michael Rosenblatt; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies.

Authors:  Anna Klindworth; Elmar Pruesse; Timmy Schweer; Jörg Peplies; Christian Quast; Matthias Horn; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Forensic analysis of the microbiome of phones and shoes.

Authors:  Simon Lax; Jarrad T Hampton-Marcell; Sean M Gibbons; Geórgia Barguil Colares; Daniel Smith; Jonathan A Eisen; Jack A Gilbert
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 14.650

9.  Humans differ in their personal microbial cloud.

Authors:  James F Meadow; Adam E Altrichter; Ashley C Bateman; Jason Stenson; G Z Brown; Jessica L Green; Brendan J M Bohannan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Informed decision-making among students analyzing their personal genomes on a whole genome sequencing course: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Michael D Linderman; Andrew Kasarskis; Ali Bashir; George A Diaz; Milind C Mahajan; Hardik Shah; Melissa Wasserstein; Randi E Zinberg; Micol Zweig; Eric E Schadt
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fiber Force: A Fiber Diet Intervention in an Advanced Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) Course.

Authors:  Julia Massimelli Sewall; Andrew Oliver; Kameryn Denaro; Alexander B Chase; Claudia Weihe; Mi Lay; Jennifer B H Martiny; Katrine Whiteson
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 2.  Microbiomes for All.

Authors:  Theodore R Muth; Avrom J Caplan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Personal microbiome analysis improves student engagement and interest in Immunology, Molecular Biology, and Genomics undergraduate courses.

Authors:  K Scott Weber; Laura C Bridgewater; Jamie L Jensen; Donald P Breakwell; Brent L Nielsen; Steven M Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.