Literature DB >> 27856404

Usefulness and safety of the "God's Hand" pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in femoral catheterization.

Sungwon Kim1, Jae Hyun Kwon, Yoon Hee Han, Jeung Sook Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the usefulness and safety of the God's Hand pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in patients undergoing percutaneous endovascular procedures via femoral artery.
METHODS: Two hundred thirty-seven patients in whom hemostasis of femoral catheterization was achieved using a God's Hand pneumatic compression device were enrolled. The patients were divided into group A, those in whom the device was applied for four hours, and group B, those in whom the device was applied for two hours, with an additional two hours of bed rest in both groups. Groups A and B were regrouped to groups A' and B' using the propensity score matching method (n=65, for both). Chi-squared test and logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between the complication rate and patient characteristics and procedure-related factors.
RESULTS: Clinical success was achieved in 216 of 237 patients (91.1%): 63 in group A (84%) and 153 in group B (94.4%); in propensity score matched groups, clinical success was seen in 47 patients in group A' (81.5%) and 62 patients in group B' (95.4%). Group B' showed a higher clinical success rate than group A' (P = 0.028). There were no major complications. In logistic regression models, a negative association was noted between the complication rate and the duration of God's Hand application; however, this association was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The God's Hand pneumatic compression device is effective and safe for the hemostasis of femoral catheterization, and four hours of bed rest is sufficient for hemostasis in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27856404      PMCID: PMC5214076          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2016.15451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  26 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous arterial closure devices.

Authors:  Eric K Hoffer; Robert D Bloch
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Use of FemoStop system for arterial puncture site closure after coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  H Ekstrand
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.022

Review 3.  Arterial closure devices. A review.

Authors:  J B Madigan; L A Ratnam; A M Belli
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.888

4.  Posterior wall capture and resultant common femoral occlusion complicating StarClose access closure.

Authors:  Patrick A Stone; John E Campbell; Karinna H Andrews; Mark C Bates
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Percutaneous transluminal dilatation of inadvertent partial or complete occlusion of the femoral artery caused by Angio-Seal deployment for puncture site closure after cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Martin Brueck; Dirk Bandorski; Klaus Rauber; Andreas Boening
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.022

6.  A retrospective review on feasibility and safety of a new pneumatic compression device for femoral arteriotomy hemostasis.

Authors:  Minho Kang; Sung Wook Shin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Transfemoral catheterization: mechanical versus manual control of bleeding.

Authors:  H J Semler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Comparison of the FemoStop device and manual pressure in reducing groin puncture site complications following coronary angioplasty and coronary stent placement.

Authors:  S B Walker; S Cleary; M Higgins
Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.066

9.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of suture-mediated closure device-related femoral artery stenosis or occlusive disease.

Authors:  Y-J Kim; H-K Yoon; G-Y Ko; J-H Shin; K-B Sung
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  [Manual compression versus mechanical compression device (FemoStop) after diagnostic coronary angiography with/without intervention].

Authors:  Leopold Stiebellehner; Mariam Nikfardjan; Katja Diem; Marcus Atteneder; Thomas Stulnig; Ute Priglinger; Michael Gottsauner-Wolf; Kurt Huber
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2002-10-31       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.