Literature DB >> 27856293

Substantial rise in the lifetime risk of primary total knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis from 2003 to 2013: an international, population-level analysis.

I N Ackerman1, M A Bohensky2, R de Steiger3, C A Brand4, A Eskelinen5, A M Fenstad6, O Furnes7, G Garellick8, S E Graves9, J Haapakoski10, L I Havelin11, K Mäkelä12, F Mehnert13, A B Pedersen14, O Robertsson15.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the lifetime risk of total knee replacement surgery (TKR) for osteoarthritis (OA) between countries, and over time.
METHOD: Data on primary TKR procedures performed for OA in 2003 and 2013 were extracted from national arthroplasty registries in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Life tables and population data were also obtained for each country. Lifetime risk of TKR was calculated for 2003 and 2013 using registry, life table and population data.
RESULTS: Marked international variation in lifetime risk of TKR was evident, with females consistently demonstrating the greatest risk. In 2013, Finland had the highest lifetime risk for females (22.8%, 95%CI 22.5-23.1%) and Australia had the highest risk for males (15.4%, 95%CI 15.1-15.6%). Norway had the lowest lifetime risk for females (9.7%, 95%CI 9.5-9.9%) and males (5.8%, 95%CI 5.6-5.9%) in 2013. All countries showed a significant rise in lifetime risk of TKR for both sexes over the 10-year study period, with the largest increases observed in Australia (females: from 13.6% to 21.1%; males: from 9.8% to 15.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Using population-based data, this study identified significant increases in the lifetime risk of TKR in all five countries from 2003 to 2013. Lifetime risk of TKR was as high as 1 in 5 women in Finland, and 1 in 7 males in Australia. These risk estimates quantify the healthcare resource burden of knee OA at the population level, providing an important resource for public health policy development and healthcare planning.
Copyright © 2016 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Health service utilisation; Knee arthroplasty; Knee replacement; Osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27856293     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  21 in total

1.  Increase in Total Joint Arthroplasty Projected from 2014 to 2046 in Australia: A Conservative Local Model With International Implications.

Authors:  Maria C S Inacio; Stephen E Graves; Nicole L Pratt; Elizabeth E Roughead; Szilard Nemes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Core and adjunctive interventions for osteoarthritis: efficacy and models for implementation.

Authors:  Jocelyn L Bowden; David J Hunter; Leticia A Deveza; Vicky Duong; Krysia S Dziedzic; Kelli D Allen; Ping-Keung Chan; Jillian P Eyles
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Sex-Specific Reduction in Inflammation of Osteoarthritic Human Chondrocytes and Nutraceutical-Dependent Extracellular Matrix Formation.

Authors:  Alia Mallah; Mahmoud Amr; Haneen Abusharkh; Bernard Van Wie; Arda Gozen; Juana Mendenhall; Edwin Tingstad; Vincent Idone; Nehal I Abu-Lail
Journal:  J Immunol Regen Med       Date:  2021-10-08

4.  The Relationship of Pain Reduction With Prevention of Knee Replacement Under Dynamic Intervention Strategies.

Authors:  S Reza Jafarzadeh; Tuhina Neogi; Daniel K White; David T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 15.483

5.  ACL Reconstruction Patients Have Increased Risk of Knee Arthroplasty at 15 Years of Follow-up: Data from the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register and the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 2004 to 2020.

Authors:  Håvard Visnes; Tone Gifstad; Andreas Persson; Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre; Lars Engebretsen; Jon Olav Drogset; Ove Furnes
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-06-21

6.  Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is comparable to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  James Randolph Onggo; Jason Derry Onggo; Richard De Steiger; Raphael Hau
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  How long do revised and multiply revised knee replacements last? An analysis of the National Joint Registry.

Authors:  Kevin Deere; Michael R Whitehouse; Setor K Kunutsor; Adrian Sayers; Andrew J Price; James Mason; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  Lancet Rheumatol       Date:  2021-04-29

8.  Population-based 10-year cumulative revision risks after hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis to inform patients in clinical practice: a competing risk analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Maaike G J Gademan; Liza N Van Steenbergen; Suzanne C Cannegieter; Rob G H H Nelissen; Perla J Marang-Van De Mheen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  General practitioners' perspectives on a proposed new model of service delivery for primary care management of knee osteoarthritis: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Thorlene Egerton; Rachel Nelligan; Jenny Setchell; Lou Atkins; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  The feasibility of implementing the ICHOM Standard Set for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: a mixed-methods evaluation in public and private hospital settings.

Authors:  Ilana N Ackerman; Bernarda Cavka; Jacob Lippa; Andrew Bucknill
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.