Mohamed Estai1, Stuart Bunt2, Yogesan Kanagasingam3, Estie Kruger2, Marc Tennant2. 1. International Research Collaborative-Oral Health and Equity: School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. Electronic address: abdalla177@gmail.com. 2. International Research Collaborative-Oral Health and Equity: School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 3. Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to systematically review the literature for research evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry in the detection of dental caries. METHODS: Two reviewers searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases through January 2016 for comparative studies that examined the diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry for detecting caries compared with nontelemedicine alternatives. Retrieved studies were screened for inclusion criteria and were evaluated for methodological quality using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) checklist. RESULTS: Of 287 citations identified, 10 met the preset inclusion criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were the most common measures of diagnostic accuracy used in 10 studies. Despite very limited published evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry, the reviewed teledentistry studies showed comparable diagnostic performance compared with nontelemedicine alternatives. The average methodological quality of the selected articles is low, since none of the selected studies satisfied all 4 QUADAS-2 domains. Only 6 articles were scored as having a low risk of bias in 3 of 4 of QUADAS-2 domains. All the selected studies had low concerns regarding applicability. The main shortcoming was that in most of the selected studies, the methodology, in particular patient selection and index tests, was insufficiently described. CONCLUSIONS: Teledentistry has an acceptable diagnostic performance in the detection of dental caries. However, due to the heterogeneity of the reviewed studies, the generalization of results may be difficult. Further well-designed research to investigate the effectiveness of the teledentistry approach to caries detection is needed to determine the capability of this technology in epidemiologic oral surveys.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to systematically review the literature for research evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry in the detection of dental caries. METHODS: Two reviewers searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases through January 2016 for comparative studies that examined the diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry for detecting caries compared with nontelemedicine alternatives. Retrieved studies were screened for inclusion criteria and were evaluated for methodological quality using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) checklist. RESULTS: Of 287 citations identified, 10 met the preset inclusion criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were the most common measures of diagnostic accuracy used in 10 studies. Despite very limited published evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry, the reviewed teledentistry studies showed comparable diagnostic performance compared with nontelemedicine alternatives. The average methodological quality of the selected articles is low, since none of the selected studies satisfied all 4 QUADAS-2 domains. Only 6 articles were scored as having a low risk of bias in 3 of 4 of QUADAS-2 domains. All the selected studies had low concerns regarding applicability. The main shortcoming was that in most of the selected studies, the methodology, in particular patient selection and index tests, was insufficiently described. CONCLUSIONS: Teledentistry has an acceptable diagnostic performance in the detection of dental caries. However, due to the heterogeneity of the reviewed studies, the generalization of results may be difficult. Further well-designed research to investigate the effectiveness of the teledentistry approach to caries detection is needed to determine the capability of this technology in epidemiologic oral surveys.
Authors: Mathias S Lambach; Panagiotis Ntovas; Stavroula Michou; Ana R Benetti; Azam Bakhshandeh; Christos Rahiotis; Kim R Ekstrand; Christoph Vannahme Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Farooq Ahmad Chaudhary; Basaruddin Ahmad; Muhammad Qasim Javed; Saeed Mustafa; Ayesha Fazal; Muhammad Mohsin Javaid; Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Shahab Ud Din Journal: Digit Health Date: 2022-03-24
Authors: Antonio Ciardo; Sarah K Sonnenschein; Marlinde M Simon; Maurice Ruetters; Marcia Spindler; Philipp Ziegler; Ingvi Reccius; Alexander-Nicolaus Spies; Jana Kykal; Eva-Marie Baumann; Susanne Fackler; Christopher Büsch; Ti-Sun Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eduardo K Kohara; Camilla G Abdala; Tatiane F Novaes; Mariana M Braga; Ana E Haddad; Fausto M Mendes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Song Hee Oh; Sae Rom Lee; Jin Young Choi; Yong Suk Choi; Seong Hun Kim; Hong Cheol Yoon; Gerald Nelson Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Mohammad Zakaria Nassani; Sadeq Ali Al-Maweri; Abdullah AlSheddi; Ali Alomran; Mohammed Nasser Aldawsari; Ahmed Aljubarah; Ahmed Mohammed Almuhanna; Nawaf Meshal Almutairi; Anas B Alsalhani; Mohammed Noushad Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2021-12-04