Literature DB >> 27855394

Prenasal Thickness, Prefrontal Space Ratio and Other Facial Profile Markers in First-Trimester Fetuses with Aneuploidies, Cleft Palate, and Micrognathia.

Merel Bakker1, Margherita Pace, Els de Jong-Pleij, Erwin Birnie, Karl-Oliver Kagan, Caterina M Bilardo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and reproducibility of the prenasal thickness (PNT)/nasal bone length (NBL) ratio, maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle, facial profile line, profile line distance, and prefrontal space ratio (PFSR) in the first trimester of pregnancy, develop normal ranges, and evaluate these markers in abnormal fetuses.
METHODS: All measurements were performed on stored images by two operators. Feasibility, interoperator agreement, and prediction intervals were calculated for all measurements.
RESULTS: Feasibility was the highest for the NBL (74.3-79.7%) and the MNM angle (75.7-79.05%). Correlation was good for the NBL, the PNT, and the MNM angle (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.706-0.835). Mean difference between operators was the lowest for the PNT and PFSR (0.03-0.08). Measurements in abnormal fetuses showed that the majority of trisomy 21 fetuses had either an absent nasal bone or a shorter NBL. The PNT and PNT/NBL ratio were above the 97.5th centile in one third of the cases. Fetuses with facial clefts or micrognathia showed on average a large MNM angle (multiple of the median 0.96-5.15).
CONCLUSION: First-trimester facial markers are feasible. The PNT and PNT/NBL ratio were increased in one third of the trisomic fetuses, and the MNM angle in the majority of fetuses with micrognathia and facial clefts.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facial profile line; First trimester; Maxilla-nasion-mandible angle; Nasal bone; Prefrontal space ratio; Prenasal thickness/nasal bone length ratio; Prenatal screening; Prenatal thickness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27855394     DOI: 10.1159/000449099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1015-3837            Impact factor:   2.587


  5 in total

1.  Early Detection of Structural Anomalies in a Primary Care Setting in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Francesca Bardi; Eric Smith; Maja Kuilman; Rosalinde J M Snijders; Caterina Maddalena Bilardo
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.587

2.  Ultrasonographic study of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester.

Authors:  Chunya Ji; Xiaoli Jiang; Linliang Yin; Xuedong Deng; Zhong Yang; Qi Pan; Jun Zhang; Qing Liang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Utility of fetal facial markers on a second trimester genetic sonogram in screening for Down syndrome in a high-risk Thai population.

Authors:  Savitree Pranpanus; Kanokkarn Keatkongkaew; Manaphat Suksai
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Clinical value of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Zhou; Chunya Ji; Lingling Sun; Linliang Yin; Xuedong Deng; Qi Pan; Jun Zhang; Zhong Yang; Chenhan Zheng; Chen Ling; Liping Shi; Yanqing Wu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Application of an individualized nomogram in first-trimester screening for trisomy 21.

Authors:  Y Sun; L Zhang; D Dong; X Li; J Wang; C Yin; L C Poon; J Tian; Q Wu
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 7.299

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.