Hallie C Prescott1,2. 1. 1 VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development Service Center of Innovation, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and. 2. 2 Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Rehospitalization is common after sepsis, but little is known about the variation in readmission patterns across patient groups and care locations. OBJECTIVES: To examine the variation in postsepsis readmission rates and diagnoses by patient age, nursing facility use, admission year, and hospital among U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) beneficiaries. METHODS: Observational cohort study of VA beneficiaries who survived a sepsis hospitalization (2009-2011) at 114 VA hospitals, stratified by age (<65 vs. ≥65 yr), nursing home usage (none, chronic, or acute), year of admission (2009, 2010, 2011), and hospital. In the primary analysis, sepsis hospitalizations were identified using a previously validated method. Sensitivity analyses were performed using alternative definitions with explicit International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes for sepsis, and separately for severe sepsis and septic shock. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcomes were rate of 90-day all-cause hospital readmission after sepsis hospitalization and proportion of readmissions resulting from specific diagnoses, including the proportion of "potentially preventable" readmissions. Readmission diagnoses were similar from 2009 to 2011, with little variation in readmission rates across hospitals. The top six readmission diagnoses (heart failure, pneumonia, sepsis, urinary tract infection, acute renal failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) accounted for 30% of all readmissions. Although about one in five readmissions had a principal diagnosis for infection, 58% of all readmissions received early systemic antibiotics. Infection accounted for a greater proportion of readmissions among patients discharged to nursing facilities compared with patients discharged to home (25.0-27.1% vs. 16.8%) and among older vs. younger patients (22.2% vs. 15.8%). Potentially preventable readmissions accounted for a quarter of readmissions overall and were more common among older patients and patients discharged to nursing facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital readmission rates after sepsis were similar by site and admission year. Heart failure, pneumonia, sepsis, and urinary tract infection were common readmission diagnoses across all patient groups. Readmission for infection and potentially preventable diagnoses were more common in older patients and patients discharged to nursing facilities.
RATIONALE: Rehospitalization is common after sepsis, but little is known about the variation in readmission patterns across patient groups and care locations. OBJECTIVES: To examine the variation in postsepsis readmission rates and diagnoses by patient age, nursing facility use, admission year, and hospital among U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) beneficiaries. METHODS: Observational cohort study of VA beneficiaries who survived a sepsis hospitalization (2009-2011) at 114 VA hospitals, stratified by age (<65 vs. ≥65 yr), nursing home usage (none, chronic, or acute), year of admission (2009, 2010, 2011), and hospital. In the primary analysis, sepsis hospitalizations were identified using a previously validated method. Sensitivity analyses were performed using alternative definitions with explicit International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes for sepsis, and separately for severe sepsis and septic shock. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcomes were rate of 90-day all-cause hospital readmission after sepsis hospitalization and proportion of readmissions resulting from specific diagnoses, including the proportion of "potentially preventable" readmissions. Readmission diagnoses were similar from 2009 to 2011, with little variation in readmission rates across hospitals. The top six readmission diagnoses (heart failure, pneumonia, sepsis, urinary tract infection, acute renal failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) accounted for 30% of all readmissions. Although about one in five readmissions had a principal diagnosis for infection, 58% of all readmissions received early systemic antibiotics. Infection accounted for a greater proportion of readmissions among patients discharged to nursing facilities compared with patients discharged to home (25.0-27.1% vs. 16.8%) and among older vs. younger patients (22.2% vs. 15.8%). Potentially preventable readmissions accounted for a quarter of readmissions overall and were more common among older patients and patients discharged to nursing facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital readmission rates after sepsis were similar by site and admission year. Heart failure, pneumonia, sepsis, and urinary tract infection were common readmission diagnoses across all patient groups. Readmission for infection and potentially preventable diagnoses were more common in older patients and patients discharged to nursing facilities.
Authors: Marta L Render; H Myra Kim; Deborah E Welsh; Stephen Timmons; Joseph Johnston; Siu Hui; Alfred F Connors; Douglas Wagner; Jennifer Daley; Timothy P Hofer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Marta L Render; James Deddens; Ron Freyberg; Peter Almenoff; Alfred F Connors; Douglas Wagner; Timothy P Hofer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Tiffanie K Jones; Barry D Fuchs; Dylan S Small; Scott D Halpern; Asaf Hanish; Craig A Umscheid; Charles A Baillie; Meeta Prasad Kerlin; David F Gaieski; Mark E Mikkelsen Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2015-06
Authors: Lona Mody; Sarah L Krein; Sanjay Saint; Lillian C Min; Ana Montoya; Bonnie Lansing; Sara E McNamara; Kathleen Symons; Jay Fisch; Evonne Koo; Ruth Anne Rye; Andrzej Galecki; Mohammed U Kabeto; James T Fitzgerald; Russell N Olmsted; Carol A Kauffman; Suzanne F Bradley Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: M Cristina Vazquez Guillamet; Rodrigo Vazquez; Jonas Noe; Scott T Micek; Victoria J Fraser; Marin H Kollef Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Brenda M Vincent; Daniel Molling; Gabriel J Escobar; Timothy P Hofer; Theodore J Iwashyna; Vincent X Liu; Amy K Rosen; Andrew M Ryan; Sarah Seelye; Wyndy L Wiitala; Hallie C Prescott Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Leah B Kosyakovsky; Federico Angriman; Emma Katz; Neill K Adhikari; Lucas C Godoy; John C Marshall; Bruno L Ferreyro; Douglas S Lee; Robert S Rosenson; Naveed Sattar; Subodh Verma; Augustin Toma; Marina Englesakis; Barry Burstein; Michael E Farkouh; Margaret Herridge; Dennis T Ko; Damon C Scales; Michael E Detsky; Lior Bibas; Patrick R Lawler Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-08-09 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Nathaniel Meyer; Michael O Harhay; Dylan S Small; Hallie C Prescott; Kathryn H Bowles; David F Gaieski; Mark E Mikkelsen Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Max T Wayne; Daniel Molling; Xiao Qing Wang; Cainnear K Hogan; Sarah Seelye; Vincent X Liu; Hallie C Prescott Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2021-04