| Literature DB >> 27854003 |
Shadi A Ghassemi Jahani1,2, Jon Karlsson3,4, Helena Brisby3,4, Aina J Danielsson3,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of limb malformations on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and function of the extremities in middle-aged individuals with thalidomide embryopathy (TE). Between 1959 and 1962, approximately 150 children with multiple malformations were born in Sweden following the maternal intake of thalidomide during pregnancy, of whom 100 survived.Entities:
Keywords: Embryopathy; Function; Long term; Outcome; Quality of life; Thalidomide
Year: 2016 PMID: 27854003 PMCID: PMC5145847 DOI: 10.1007/s11832-016-0797-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
Muskuloskeletal malformations found in 31 individuals with thalidomide embryopathy at follow-up of this study
| Upper extremity |
| Lower extremity |
| Other malformations |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At any location of the upper extremity | 27 (87) | PFFD in combination with other deformitiesa | 5 (16) | Ear: hearing deficit | 6 (19) |
| Shoulder | 5 (16) | Hip deformity without a diagnosis of PFFDb | 1 (3) | Facial nerve palsy | 3 (10) |
| Elbow/forearm | 11 (36) | Other malformations | Duane’s syndromec | 9 (29) | |
| Hand | 25 (81) | Incomitant gaze | 10 (32) | ||
| Type of grip function | Tearing while eating | 5 (16) | |||
| Anatomical pincer grip bilaterally | 11 (36) | Other internal anomaliesd | 10 (32) | ||
| Any type of functional grip bilaterally | 27 (87) |
All values in table represent occurrence in number of patients, regardless of whether it is uni- or bilateral
PFFD Proximal focal femoral deficiency
aSee Table 2 for further description
bDislocated hip, coxa vara, and femoral bowing before surgery with total hip replacement. The primary appearance is unknown
cDuane’s syndrome; a disorder in abduction of the eyes due to defect cranial nerve 6 (CN)
dIncludes double vagina, aplasia of the uterus, kidney aplasia, choanal atresia and enamel hypoplasia
Appearance of the lower limbs and previous surgery in the five individuals of the study group diagnosed with proximal focal femoral deficiency (Patient I–V)
| Malformations of lower limbs/previous surgery | I | II | III | IV | V | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | |
| Significant shortening | • | No | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • |
| PFFDa | II/B | No | II/D | II/D | II/C | No | I/C | II/C | I/D | II/D |
| Tibia or fibular hypoplasia/aplasia | No | No | • | • | • | Absent | • | • | No | • |
| Major foot deformity? | Equinus, cavus | No | Valgus, abductus | Varus, supinatus | Only hindfoot | Absent | Equinus | Equinus, varus | Equinus | Equinus, varus |
| Previous surgery, all before age 18 years | No | No | No | No | Midfoot amputation | Amputation at knee level | No | Correction of equinus/varus deformity | Hip surgeryb | Correction of equinus/varus deformity |
aDescription of the different grades of PFFD is according to Gillespie and Torode [20] and Aitken [19]. Gillespie and Torode [20]: Group A: the femur is up to 50% shorter than the normal femur and the hips and knees can be made functional. Group B: more severely shortened femora in which the foot on the affected side reaches above the mid-tibia on the normal side, often at the level of the normal knee. With the hips flexed, the femur is noted to be at or less than half the length of the contralateral femur. Group C: subtotal absence of the femur. Aitken [19]: Type A: the femoral head present in a normal acetabulum, short femur. Type B: the femoral head is present in the acetabulum, adequate, or moderately dysplastic acetabulum, femoral segment short. No osseous connection between head and shaft. Type C: femoral head absent or represented by ossicle, severely dysplastic acetabulum, femoral segment short. May be an osseous connection between the shaft and proximal ossicle. Type D: femoral head and acetabulum absent, short femoral segment, deformed. No relationship between different components of the femur and acetabulum at skeletal maturity
bThe computed tomography scan showed a deformed proximal femur without a proper femoral head, located superior to the normal position of the acetabulum. No proper acetabulum or neo-acetabulum could, however, be seen. One staple left in the trochanteric region
Fig. 1Computed tomography scan of one study participant with bilateral proximal focal femoral deficiency and fibular hypoplasia and tibial aplasia of the lower limbs
Sociodemographic variables reported by 31 individuals with thalidomide embryopathy
| Sociodemographic variables | All patients ( | Occurrence of major malformations in any of the limbs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No ( | Yes ( |
| ||
| Family situation | ||||
| Marital status | ||||
| Never married | 5 (16) | 2 (13) | 3 (20) | 0.55 ns |
| Married/cohabitant | 25 (81) | 13 (81) | 12 (80) | |
| Divorced/widowed | 1 (3) | 1 (6) | 0 | |
| No of individuals without children | 9 (29) | 5 (31) | 4 (27) | 0.89 ns |
| Education (highest achieved level) | ||||
| <7 years of school attendance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.69 ns |
| High school (completed or not) | 4 (13) | 3 (19) | 1 (7) | |
| Vocational school | 3 (10) | 1 (6) | 2 (13) | |
| College (completed or not) | 15 (48) | 8 (50) | 7 (47) | |
| Graduate school | 9 (29) | 4 (25) | 5 (33) | |
| Working life | ||||
| Employment | ||||
| Currently working | 24 (77) | 13 (81) | 11 (73) | 0.41 ns |
| Housewife | 1 (3) | 1 (6) | 0 | |
| Sick listed or retired | 6 (19) | 2 (13) | 4 (27) | |
| Working time | ||||
| Working full time (of those working) | 15 (62) | 9 (69) | 6 (55) | 0.32 ns |
| Stress | ||||
| No stress | 7 (23) | 3 (19) | 4 (27) | 0.47 ns |
| Minor stress | 23 (74) | 13 (81) | 10 (67) | |
| Heavy stress | 1 (3) | 0 | 1 (7) | |
Values in table are given as the number of patients with the percentage of the group under consideration given in parenthesis
ns Not significant
Function of the lower extremity as measured by the Rheumatoid Arthritis Outcome Score in individuals with thalidomide embryopathy
| Patient-relevant dimensions of RAOS | Individuals with TEa |
|---|---|
| Pain | 78.5 (20.6) [36–100] |
| Symptoms | 78.6 (17.9) [32–100] |
| Activities of daily life | 83.1 (19.7) [40–100] |
| Sports and recreation | 61.9 (36.4) [0–100] |
| Quality of life | 66.1 (26.2) [19–100] |
Values are presented as the mean score with the standard deviation in parenthesis and the range in square brackets. 100 is the best possible score.
RAOS Rheumatoid Arthritis Outcome Score, TE thalidomide embryopathy
aData were available for 31 individuals in each dimension, with the exception of Activities of daily life for which data are available for 30 individuals
Fig. 2Results for the five subscales/dimensions of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) in individuals with (n = 5, red) or without proximal focal femoral deficiency (n = 26, blue). RAOS subscales are: pain, other symptoms (i.e., stiffness, swelling, and range of motion; Symptoms), activities of daily living (ADL), sport and recreational (Sport), and lower limb-related quality of life (QoL)
Fig. 3Physical Composite Scores of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in the entire study group and analyses of the subgroups. Summary scores of 50 represent a level regarded as normal (national norm). Comparisons in relation to national norms (z-scores): *p<0.05, **p < 0.01 (red color, located just above the respective bar). Comparisons between groups: *p<0.05, **p < 0.01 (blue color, located at the top of the figure). PFFD Proximal focal femoral deficiency
Fig. 4Subscores of the SF-36 for the total study group and for subgroups in terms of the occurrence of major malformations of the extremities or of PFFD. The results for the general national reference population adjusted for age and gender are also presented for reference
Health-related quality of life as measured by the EuroQ Five Dimensions health questionnaire in patients with thalidomide embryopathy
| HRQL dimensions | Entire study group ( | Occurrence of PFFD | National populationa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No ( | Yes ( |
| |||
| Health profile | |||||
| Mobilityb | 0.018 | ||||
| I have no problems walking about | 24 (80.0%) | 23 (88.5%) | 1 (25.0%) | 94% | |
| I have some problems walking about | 6 (20.0%) | 3 (11.5%) | 3 (75.0%) | 6% | |
| I am confined to bed | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Self-care | 1.00 ns | ||||
| I have no problems with self-care | 28 (90.3%) | 24 (92.3%) | 4 (80.0%) | 98.5% | |
| I have some problems washing or dressing myself | 2 (6.5%) | 1 (3.8%) | 1 (20.0%) | 1.5% | |
| I am unable to wash or dress myself | 1 (3.2%) | 1 (3.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Usual activities | 0.0098 | ||||
| I have no problems performing my usual activities | 23 (74.2%) | 22 (84.6%) | 1 (20.0%) | 91.5% | |
| I have some problems performing my usual activities | 8 (25.8%) | 4 (15.4%) | 4 (80.0%) | 8.2% | |
| I am unable to perform my usual activities | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Pain/discomfort | 0.14 ns | ||||
| I have no pain/discomfort | 5 (16.1%) | 5 (19.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 61.1% | |
| I have moderate pain/discomfort | 17 (54.8%) | 15 (57.7%) | 2 (40.0%) | 38.9% | |
| I have extreme pain/discomfort | 9 (29.0%) | 6 (23.1%) | 3 (60.0%) | ||
| Anxiety/depression | 0.29 ns | ||||
| I am not anxious or depressed | 22 (71.0%) | 17 (65.4%) | 5 (100.0%) | 73.9% | |
| I am moderately anxious or depressed | 9 (29.0%) | 9 (34.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 26.1% | |
| I am extremely anxious or depressed | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| EQ-5D Index | 0.61 (0.12) | 0.66 (0.12) | 0.31 (0.41) | 0.035 | |
| EQ VAS rating | 69 (3.0) | 69.8 (7.1) | 65.4 (3.4) | 0.61 ns | |
Values in table are presented as a number of patients with the percentage for that group in parenthesis or as the mean values with the standard error in parenthesis, as appropriate
EQ-5D EuroQ Five Dimensions health questionnaire, VAS visual analog scale
a n = 30
bAccording to Burstrom et al. [29]
Correlation analyses between health-related quality of life and functional scores in patients with thalidomide embryopathy according to Spearman’s rank correlation test
| Generic questionnaires on HRQL | DASH ground score | RAOS pain | Number of extremities with major malformations (0–4) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SF-36 | |||
| Physical composite summary score | −0.72 ( | 0.53 ( | −0.3 ( |
| Mental composite summary score | 0.17 ns ( | 0.056 ns ( | 0.085 ns ( |
| EQ-5D | |||
| Aggregated score | −0.74 ( | 0.61 ( | −0.18 ns ( |
| Health state today | 0.15 ns ( | 0.075 ns ( | −0.087 ns ( |
SF-36 36-Item Short Form Health Survey