Efficacy of ingenol mebutate gel for actinic keratosis in patients treated by thiazide diuretics.

Actinic keratosis (AK) is considered as superficial squamous cell carcinoma. Chronic sun exposure plays a central role in its pathogenesis. In particular, ultraviolet B radiation causes direct damage to the DNA, producing pyrimidine dimers that suppress the protective role of p53. Other risk factors include advanced age, male sex, and fair skin type. Even some drugs used for treating blood hypertension, such as thiazide diuretics, can increase the risk of developing AK. Their photosensitizing action seems to be connected with reactive oxygen species production. We report our experience with ten patients affected by multiple AK, in therapy with thiazide diuretics, treated by ingenol mebutate gel. AK was clinically and dermoscopically evaluated at baseline and after 30 days from the beginning of the treatment. Moreover, patients were screened for vitamin D3 values and reported a general hypovitaminosis status. To our knowledge, we report for the first time the efficacy of ingenol mebutate gel in this group of patients, particularly at risk of developing AK.

Introduction

Actinic keratosis (AK) is an intradermal proliferation of atypical keratinocytes. AKs are considered as superficial squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), because they are fundamentally indistinguishable in terms of cytology and are similar for molecular biology.1 Clinically, AKs mostly present as squamous or hyperkeratotic papules on an erythematous background, but they can also present as pigmented, lichenoid, or cutaneous horn. A sandpaper-like texture is revealed by palpation and surrounding skin generally shows the chronic sun damage signs.2 Based on their features, people can have single or multiple AKs: patients with single lesions usually are young or old people with fair skin type. Immunosuppressed people who spend a lot of time outdoors or in photosensitization treatment have generally multiple lesions.3,4 A central role in the pathogenesis of the lesions is played by the chronic ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure. In particular, UVB can cause direct DNA damage, producing pyrimidine dimers. It can lead to suppression of p53 function which seems to be the most important pathway in the development of both AKs and SCCs, with the consequence of clonal expansion of keratinocytes.5 On the other hand, UVA, absorbed by skin chromophores, can generate reactive oxygen species that are mutagenic for DNA.6,7 Human papilloma virus seems to play a marginal role and acts as a cofactor of UV radiation-induced DNA alterations in the development of AKs.8 The main risk factors include advanced age, male sex, cumulative sun exposure, and fair skin type. Organ transplant recipients, as well as people treated with chemotherapy, antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and diuretics have higher risk than the general population for developing AKs.9 Diuretics are a class of antihypertensive drugs and thiazide diuretics, in particular, are significantly associated with increased risk of SCC. Their photosensitizing action may be due to conversion to electrophiles or production of reactive oxygen species.3 There are two different and effective treatments for AKs: lesion-directed and field-directed therapies. The lesion-directed treatments aim to destroy or remove atypical keratinocytes, whereas the field-directed therapies not only act against the lesion, but also against areas with subclinical atypical keratinocytes within a field of chronic sun exposed and damaged skin, the so-called field of cancerization.10–12 Among the latter novel therapies, ingenol mebutate gel, an extract from the plant Euphorbia peplus, induces swelling of mitochondria of dysplastic keratinocytes and cell death by primary necrosis. Its topical application generates a neutrophil infiltration, due to protein-kinase C activation, causing effective wound healing.13–15 Phase 3 studies have revealed the efficacy of ingenol mebutate gel at concentrations of 0.015% (for the face/scalp) and 0.05% (for the trunk/extremities) in clearing AKs, with remission over 12 months.16 We report cases of ten patients affected by multiple AKs, undergoing therapy with thiazide diuretics for hypertension, treated using ingenol mebutate gel in different concentrations depending on the region to treat.

Material and methods

Patients with AKs received ingenol mebutate gel in different concentrations on the basis of localization of their lesions, 0.015% for face and scalp and 0.05% for trunk and extremities, for 3 and 2 consecutive days, respectively. Eligibility criteria included an age of at least 18 years, presence of one or more AKs, and current treatment with thiazide diuretics for hypertension. The main exclusion criterion was other concomitant therapies for AKs. Females included in the study were not pregnant or breast-feeding. Ten patients (five females and five males), mean age 64.2 years (from 55 to 75 years), in good blood pressure control, were involved in the study (Table 1). No other dermatological disorders were referred. All patients signed a written consent before starting the therapy, and the study was conducted following the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration. As ingenol mebutate is approved for the treatment of actinic keratosis there was no formal ethical review board approval sought. Enrolled patients were affected by multiple AKs (a total of 24 lesions from 3.2 to 15 mm diameter) localized all over the body surface. All patients were educated to self-apply the medical device on the target lesion and perilesional field of cancerization (25 cm2). Short-distance lesions were treated at the same time if they were in a 25 cm2 diameter area, otherwise in two different times. Patients were also informed of the normal important skin reaction that would have been expected in the days following the topical application and they were asked to communicate any side effects that lay outside this one (eg, infections, allergy, and swelling). AKs were clinically and dermoscopically evaluated at baseline and at 1 month from the beginning of the treatment. From a clinical point of view, AKs were recognized by their typical sandpaper-like texture revealed by palpation. Surrounding skin generally showed chronic sun damage signs. Dermoscopy features defining AKs were erythematous pseudo-network for facial lesions and erythematous background for the ones localized elsewhere, and white-yellowish surface scales and atrophic hypopigmented areas for everywhere placed lesions. The end-point was the complete, clinical, and dermoscopic clearance of AKs after the treatment. Afterwards, the patients were followed for approximately a year with no evidence of recurrence of the disease.

Table 1

General information about patients involved in the study

Sex	Age (years)	Localization	Vitamin D3 (ng/mL)	Therapy
M	58	Back, left forearm	12.40	HCT (5 years)
M	69	Back (2#), right forearm, right hand	10.20	HCT (8 years)
F	75	Left cheek*, forehead	11.50	HCT (10 years)
M	56	Nose, chin	22.00	HCT (5 years)
F	59	Nose*, left leg	13.10	HCT (4 years)
M	67	Left forearm, left hand	12.00	HCT (7 years)
M	68	Back, right arm	11.80	HCT (10 years)
F	55	Right cheek, left forearm	20.50	HCT (4 years)
F	60	Nose*, neckline (2#)	17.60	HCT (8 years)
F	75	Nose, neckline, forehead	14.40	HCT (8 years)

Note:

Lesions in figures.

The number of the lesions localized in that place.

Abbreviations: F, female; HCT, hydrochlorothiazide; M, male.

Results

We enrolled ten patients (five females and five males; mean age 64.2 years) affected by multiple AKs (24 total lesions, from 3.2 to 15 mm diameter, localized on face, scalp, trunk, and upper and lower extremities) that consecutively referred to the Dermatological Unit of our Hospital for a general skin examination (Table 1). They were on treatment with thiazide diuretics for their hypertension. The mean duration of the treatment with hydrochlorothiazide was 6.9 years (from 4 to 10 years). AKs were clinically and dermoscopically evaluated (their images were archived in our database) at baseline and after 1 month. It was prescribed ingenol mebutate gel at concentrations of 0.015% for lesions of face and scalp and 0.05% for those of trunk and extremities. In the first case, the drug was topically applied for three consecutive nights and in the latter for two consecutive nights. None of them reported particular side effect (eg, infections of the treated areas and allergy). Everyone had an important erythematous reaction at the site of application with vesicles and crusts that began within the first day of application and peaked during the following week, and totally resolved in <2 months. Despite the important sun damage that could result in lower treatment effectiveness, these patients’ response was excellent, leaving the underlying skin completely clear from lesions after only one cycle of therapy (Figures 1–3). Afterwards, patients were followed for approximately a year with no evidence of recurrence of the disease. Before the beginning of the treatment, all patients were screened for vitamin D3 values and reported a general hypovitaminosis status (mean value 14.55 ng/mL, normal range 30–80 ng/mL).

Figure 1

A 75-year-old woman affected by actinic keratosis of the left cheek.

Notes: (A) Diameter before therapy approximately 11 mm. (B) Reaction after 3 consecutive days application of ingenol mebutate gel 0.015%. (C) Complete clearance after 1 month from the end of treatment.

Figure 2

A 59-year-old woman affected by actinic keratosis of the left side of the nose.

Notes: (A) Diameter before therapy approximately 6 mm. (B) Important inflammatory reaction after 3 consecutive days application of ingenol mebutate gel 0.015%. (C) Complete clearance after 1 month from the end of treatment.

Figure 3

A 60-year-old woman affected by actinic keratosis of the nose.

Notes: (A) Diameter before therapy approximately 13 mm. (B) Complete clearance after 1 month from the end of treatment with ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% applied for 3 consecutive days.

Discussion

We analyzed a cohort of ten patients and found a general hypovitaminosis D status (mean value 14.55 ng/mL, values from 10.20 to 22.00 ng/mL). Many investigations have indicated that vitamin D3 action reduces risk of nonmelanoma skin cancers, maybe modulating p53 response to DNA damage in SCC.17,18 The association between plasma 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and the incident risk of SCC has been recognized, and could be, together with photoprotection, one of the parameters based on which patients having major risk factors for the development of SCC can be treated. Patients treated with thiazide diuretics show, in our experience, greater photo- and chrono-aging (xerosis, thin skin, fine wrinkles, and loss of elasticity) compared with the general population based on clinical and dermoscopic evaluations. As the epidermis is the major source of vitamin D3 and aged skin has less capacity to synthesize this component, it is conceivable that the hypovitaminosis status, typical of this group of patients, is ascribable to their treatment with thiazide diuretics. Therefore, the accelerated skin aging found in this group of patients might be both the cause and effect of the severe vitamin D deficiency. A population-based case–control study in 2008 in Denmark by Jensen showed association between diuretics usage, especially hydrochlorothiazide, and SCC development. Moreover, the study found an increase in the risk of tumor with an increase in the dosage of drug. The pathogenic mechanism is considered to be an interaction with UV radiation as demonstrated for another diuretic molecule, amiloride.19 Recently, a further case–control study was published and found an increased, yet imprecise, risk of SCC among Americans on treatment with diuretics.20 Thiazide diuretics are used to lower hypertension and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. They act on the luminal membrane of the distal convoluted tubule of the ascending loop of Henle. After being secreted into the tubular lumen, they inhibit the sodium chloride cotransporter and cause natriuresis. Moreover, they increase the secretion of potassium and hydrogen ions, increase the expression of sodium–calcium exchange channel, and promote the reabsorption of calcium.21,22 The diuresis and blood volume reduction are the early causes of pressure decreasing. The exact mechanism on long-term period response is not yet known. The most common side effect described is electrolyte disturbance, in particular hypokalemia, followed by hypochloremic alkalosis, hyponatremia, and hypercalcemia.23 Ingenol mebutate has demonstrated its extraordinary effectiveness in a group of patients particularly at risk of nonmelanoma skin cancers. The induction of necrosis in dysplastic keratinocytes is a winning strategy in these skin tumors.13–15 On one hand, ingenol mebutate permits to treat AKs and avoids their evolution into SCC, and on the other hand, it also makes it possible to heal the cancerization field. Nowadays, it is understood that the field of cancerization has the same importance as lesions, as it represents a large area of chronic sun damage, whence new precancerous and tumor lesions can develop in the future.24

Conclusion

Our clinical observation is useful for patients who have to perform this specific diuretic photosensitization therapy to suggest strategies that try to prevent nonmelanoma skin cancer development. Assuring good plasma 25(OH)D levels and investigating other factors that may influence its action (receptor status, binding protein levels, synthesis and catabolism mechanisms) could be the first step in this direction. Further studies are needed to determine the real photosensitizing mechanism of thiazide diuretics. To the best of our knowledge, we report for the first time the extraordinary efficacy of ingenol mebutate gel in this peculiar group of patients particularly at risk of developing nonmelanoma skin cancers.