| Literature DB >> 27853316 |
Jinghong Gao1, Xiaojun Chen2,3, Alistair Woodward4, Xiaobo Liu1, Haixia Wu1, Yaogui Lu2, Liping Li2, Qiyong Liu1.
Abstract
Few studies examined the associations of meteorological factors with road traffic injuries (RTIs). The purpose of the present study was to quantify the contributions of meteorological factors to RTI cases treated at a tertiary level hospital in Shantou city, China. A time-series diagram was employed to illustrate the time trends and seasonal variation of RTIs, and correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were conducted to investigate the relationships between meteorological parameters and RTIs. RTIs followed a seasonal pattern as more cases occurred during summer and winter months. RTIs are positively correlated with temperature and sunshine duration, while negatively associated with wind speed. Temperature, sunshine hour and wind speed were included in the final linear model with regression coefficients of 0.65 (t = 2.36, P = 0.019), 2.23 (t = 2.72, P = 0.007) and -27.66 (t = -5.67, P < 0.001), respectively, accounting for 19.93% of the total variation of RTI cases. The findings can help us better understand the associations between meteorological factors and RTIs, and with potential contributions to the development and implementation of regional level evidence-based weather-responsive traffic management system in the future.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27853316 PMCID: PMC5112526 DOI: 10.1038/srep37300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The situation and direct property losses of RTIs in China, 1973–2012.
Figure 2Relationships between weather conditions, road traffic injury and the interactive factors of the famous “Haddon matrix model” (namely human, vehicle and environmental factors).
Descriptive statistics of monthly road traffic injury cases (RTIs) and monthly mean meteorological factors during the study period. Note. SD, standard deviation.
| Variables | Percentile | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Min | 25th | Median | 75th | Max | |
| RTIs | 72.00 | 16.79 | 17.00 | 60.00 | 70.00 | 83.00 | 129.00 |
| Temperature (°C) | 22.57 | 5.43 | 12.20 | 17.20 | 23.63 | 27.89 | 30.30 |
| Rainfall (mm) | 4.13 | 4.50 | 0 | 0.87 | 2.64 | 6.07 | 24.0 |
| Relative humidity (%) | 75.03 | 5.77 | 62.00 | 70.11 | 76.62 | 79.37 | 89.00 |
| Barometric pressure (hPa) | 1012.98 | 6.62 | 1002.90 | 1007.70 | 1014.26 | 1018.02 | 1022.40 |
| Wind speed (m/s) | 1.96 | 0.27 | 1.40 | 1.74 | 1.92 | 2.12 | 2.80 |
| Sunshine hour (h) | 5.42 | 1.85 | 1.10 | 4.02 | 5.57 | 6.72 | 11.00 |
Figure 3Trends and characteristics of the monthly time series between January, 2003 and December, 2015, for road traffic injury cases (RTIs), temperature, rainfall, relative humidity, barometric pressure, wind speed and sunshine hours.
Correlations between monthly RTI cases and meteorological variables.
| Meteorological variables | Road traffic injury cases (RTIs) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient (rp or rs) | 95% CI | ||
| Temperature (°C) | rs = 0.21 | (0.052, 0.36) | |
| Rainfall (mm) | rs = −0.023 | (−0.17, 0.14) | |
| Relative humidity (%) | rp = −0.047 | (−0.19, 0.11) | |
| Barometric pressure (hPa) | rs = −0.079 | (−0.24, 0.077) | |
| Wind speed (m/s) | rp = −0.28 | (−0.41, −0.14) | |
| Sunshine hour (h) | rp = 0.19 | (0.048, 0.32) | |
Note. rp refers to Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and rs refers to Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Multiple linear regression analysis for the associations between monthly road traffic injury cases (RTIs) and meteorological factors.
| Model | Standardized Coefficients | 95% CI of β | Collinearity Statistics | ANOVA Analysis | Adjusted R Square | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | t | Sig | VIF | F | Sig | |||
| Constant | 99.73 | 10.90 | <0.001 | (81.65, 117.81) | – | 13.86 | <0.001 | 0.1993 |
| Temperature (°C) | 0.65 | 2.36 | 0.019 | (0.11, 1.19) | 1.514 | |||
| Wind speed (m/s) | −27.66 | −5.67 | <0.001 | (−37.31, −18.02) | 1.203 | |||
| Sunshine hour (h) | 2.23 | 2.72 | 0.007 | (0.61, 3.85) | 1.583 | |||
Figure 4Diagnosis of the regression model (goodness of the fit).