Literature DB >> 27849587

Wind speed reductions by large-scale wind turbine deployments lower turbine efficiencies and set low generation limits.

Lee M Miller1, Axel Kleidon2.   

Abstract

Wind turbines generate electricity by removing kinetic energy from the atmosphere. Large numbers of wind turbines are likely to reduce wind speeds, which lowers estimates of electricity generation from what would be presumed from unaffected conditions. Here, we test how well wind power limits that account for this effect can be estimated without explicitly simulating atmospheric dynamics. We first use simulations with an atmospheric general circulation model (GCM) that explicitly simulates the effects of wind turbines to derive wind power limits (GCM estimate), and compare them to a simple approach derived from the climatological conditions without turbines [vertical kinetic energy (VKE) estimate]. On land, we find strong agreement between the VKE and GCM estimates with respect to electricity generation rates (0.32 and 0.37 We m-2) and wind speed reductions by 42 and 44%. Over ocean, the GCM estimate is about twice the VKE estimate (0.59 and 0.29 We m-2) and yet with comparable wind speed reductions (50 and 42%). We then show that this bias can be corrected by modifying the downward momentum flux to the surface. Thus, large-scale limits to wind power use can be derived from climatological conditions without explicitly simulating atmospheric dynamics. Consistent with the GCM simulations, the approach estimates that only comparatively few land areas are suitable to generate more than 1 We m-2 of electricity and that larger deployment scales are likely to reduce the expected electricity generation rate of each turbine. We conclude that these atmospheric effects are relevant for planning the future expansion of wind power.

Keywords:  momentum; natural limits; surface stress; vertical transport; wind energy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27849587      PMCID: PMC5137733          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1602253113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  Two methods for estimating limits to large-scale wind power generation.

Authors:  Lee M Miller; Nathaniel A Brunsell; David B Mechem; Fabian Gans; Andrew J Monaghan; Robert Vautard; David W Keith; Axel Kleidon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The influence of large-scale wind power on global climate.

Authors:  David W Keith; Joseph F Decarolis; David C Denkenberger; Donald H Lenschow; Sergey L Malyshev; Stephen Pacala; Philip J Rasch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Limits to wind power utilization.

Authors:  M R Gustavson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Saturation wind power potential and its implications for wind energy.

Authors:  Mark Z Jacobson; Cristina L Archer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Global potential for wind-generated electricity.

Authors:  Xi Lu; Michael B McElroy; Juha Kiviluoma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Could energy-intensive industries be powered by carbon-free electricity?

Authors:  David J C MacKay
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Reply to Badger and Volker: Correctly estimating wind resources at large scales requires more than simple extrapolation.

Authors:  Lee M Miller; Axel Kleidon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Efficient large-scale wind turbine deployment can meet global electricity generation needs.

Authors:  Jake Badger; Patrick J H Volker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Vertical structure of conventionally neutral atmospheric boundary layers.

Authors:  Luoqin Liu; Richard J A M Stevens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Potential for natural evaporation as a reliable renewable energy resource.

Authors:  Ahmet-Hamdi Cavusoglu; Xi Chen; Pierre Gentine; Ozgur Sahin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Have wind turbines in Germany generated electricity as would be expected from the prevailing wind conditions in 2000-2014?

Authors:  Sonja Germer; Axel Kleidon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.