Literature DB >> 26305925

Two methods for estimating limits to large-scale wind power generation.

Lee M Miller1, Nathaniel A Brunsell2, David B Mechem2, Fabian Gans3, Andrew J Monaghan4, Robert Vautard5, David W Keith6, Axel Kleidon3.   

Abstract

Wind turbines remove kinetic energy from the atmospheric flow, which reduces wind speeds and limits generation rates of large wind farms. These interactions can be approximated using a vertical kinetic energy (VKE) flux method, which predicts that the maximum power generation potential is 26% of the instantaneous downward transport of kinetic energy using the preturbine climatology. We compare the energy flux method to the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) regional atmospheric model equipped with a wind turbine parameterization over a 10(5) km2 region in the central United States. The WRF simulations yield a maximum generation of 1.1 We⋅m(-2), whereas the VKE method predicts the time series while underestimating the maximum generation rate by about 50%. Because VKE derives the generation limit from the preturbine climatology, potential changes in the vertical kinetic energy flux from the free atmosphere are not considered. Such changes are important at night when WRF estimates are about twice the VKE value because wind turbines interact with the decoupled nocturnal low-level jet in this region. Daytime estimates agree better to 20% because the wind turbines induce comparatively small changes to the downward kinetic energy flux. This combination of downward transport limits and wind speed reductions explains why large-scale wind power generation in windy regions is limited to about 1 We⋅m(-2), with VKE capturing this combination in a comparatively simple way.

Keywords:  extraction limits; generation limits; kinetic energy flux; turbine–atmosphere interactions; wind resource

Year:  2015        PMID: 26305925      PMCID: PMC4568694          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1408251112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  Impacts of wind farms on surface air temperatures.

Authors:  Somnath Baidya Roy; Justin J Traiteur
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The influence of large-scale wind power on global climate.

Authors:  David W Keith; Joseph F Decarolis; David C Denkenberger; Donald H Lenschow; Sergey L Malyshev; Stephen Pacala; Philip J Rasch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Limits to wind power utilization.

Authors:  M R Gustavson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Saturation wind power potential and its implications for wind energy.

Authors:  Mark Z Jacobson; Cristina L Archer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Global potential for wind-generated electricity.

Authors:  Xi Lu; Michael B McElroy; Juha Kiviluoma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Could energy-intensive industries be powered by carbon-free electricity?

Authors:  David J C MacKay
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Regional climate model simulations indicate limited climatic impacts by operational and planned European wind farms.

Authors:  Robert Vautard; Françoise Thais; Isabelle Tobin; François-Marie Bréon; Jean-Guy Devezeaux de Lavergne; Augustin Colette; Pascal Yiou; Paolo Michele Ruti
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Wind speed reductions by large-scale wind turbine deployments lower turbine efficiencies and set low generation limits.

Authors:  Lee M Miller; Axel Kleidon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reply to Badger and Volker: Correctly estimating wind resources at large scales requires more than simple extrapolation.

Authors:  Lee M Miller; Axel Kleidon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Spatial constraints in large-scale expansion of wind power plants.

Authors:  Enrico G A Antonini; Ken Caldeira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Potential for natural evaporation as a reliable renewable energy resource.

Authors:  Ahmet-Hamdi Cavusoglu; Xi Chen; Pierre Gentine; Ozgur Sahin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Have wind turbines in Germany generated electricity as would be expected from the prevailing wind conditions in 2000-2014?

Authors:  Sonja Germer; Axel Kleidon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The quantity-quality transition in the value of expanding wind and solar power generation.

Authors:  Enrico G A Antonini; Tyler H Ruggles; David J Farnham; Ken Caldeira
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  Geophysical potential for wind energy over the open oceans.

Authors:  Anna Possner; Ken Caldeira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.