| Literature DB >> 27847642 |
Leonardo Provetti Cunha1, Ana Laura Maciel Almeida2, Luciana Virgínia Ferreira Costa-Cunha3, Carolina Ferreira Costa3, Mário L R Monteiro4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and its incidence is increasing worldwide along with population aging. Previous clinical and histologic studies suggest that the neurodegenerative process, which affects the brain, may also affect the retina of AD patients. MAIN BODY: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive technology that acquires cross-sectional images of retinal structures allowing neural fundus integrity assessment. Several previous studies demonstrated that both peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness measurements assessed by OCT were able to detect neuronal loss in AD. Moreover, recent advances in OCT technology, have allowed substantial enhancement in ultrastructural evaluation of the macula, enabling the assessment not only of full-thickness retinal measurements but also of inner retinal layers, which seems to be a promising approach, mainly regarding the assessment of retinal ganglion cell layer impairment in AD patients. Furthermore, retinal neuronal loss seems to correlate with cognitive impairment in AD, reinforcing the promising role of OCT in the clinical evaluation of these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Dementia; Ganglion cell layer; Macula; Mild cognitive impairment; Optic nerve; Optical coherence tomography; Retina; Retinal nerve fiber layer
Year: 2016 PMID: 27847642 PMCID: PMC5088456 DOI: 10.1186/s40942-016-0049-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Retina Vitreous ISSN: 2056-9920
Demographic data and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment and controls by OCT
| Study | OCT type | Diagnosis, number of subjects (eyes) | Mean age ± SD (years) | Mean MMSE ± SD | Mean peripapillary RNFL SD (µm) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parisi et al. [ | TD | AD, 17 (17) | 70.4 ± 6.1 | 16.4 ± 2.4 | 59.5 ± 16.8** | The mean peripapillary RNFL thicknes correlated with PERG |
| Controls, 14 (14) | Age-matched | 99.9 ± 8.95 | ||||
| Iseri et al. [ | TD | AD, 14 (28) | 70.1 ± 9.7 | 18.5 ± 6.3 | 87.5 ± 23.8*** | The peripapillary and macular RNFL thickness of AD patients were thinner than in control subjects. Total macular volume and MMSE scores were significantly correlated |
| Controls, 14 (14) | 65.1 ± 9.8 | 113.2 ± 6.7 | ||||
| Berisha et al. [ | TD | AD, 9 (9) | 74.3 ± 3.3 | 23.8 ± 5.1 | 85.5 ± 7.4 | Narrow veins and decreased retinal blood flow in these veins |
| Controls, 8 (8) | 74.3 ± 5.8 | 93.8 ± 10.4 | ||||
| Paquet et al. [ | TD | AD, 26 (52) | 78.5 ± 4.9 | 83.4 ± 7.2** | Early involvement of the RNFL in patients with MCI | |
| Mild AD, 14 (28) | 22.6 | |||||
| Severe AD, 12 (24) | 16.6 | |||||
| MCI, 23 (46) | 78.7 ± 5.1 | 28.8 | 89.3 ± 2.7** | |||
| Controls, 15 (30) | 75.5 ± 5.1 | 102.2 ± 1.8 | ||||
| Lu et al. [ | TD | AD, 22 (44) | 73.0 ± 8.0 | 90.0 ± 18.0* | The RNFL thickness reductions of predominantly in the superior and inferior quadrants | |
| Controls, 22 (44) | 68.0 ± 9.0 | 98.0 ± 12.0 | ||||
| Kesler et al. [ | TD | AD, 30 (52) | 73.7 ± 9.9 | 23.6 ± 4.3 | 84.7 ± 10.6* | No correlation between RNFL thickness measurements and MMSE in AD patients |
| MCI, 24 (40) | 71.0 ± 10.0 | 28.1 ± 2.1 | 85.8 10.0* | |||
| Controls, 24 (38) | 70.9 ± 9.2 | 94.3 ± 11.3 | ||||
| Moschos et al. [ | TD | AD, 30 (60) | 71.8 ± 8.6 | There is a functional abnormality of the outer retina in central macular area in mild stages of AD | ||
| Controls, 30 (60) | Age-matched | |||||
| Moreno-Ramos et al. [ | SD | AD, 10 (20) | 73.0 ± 6.5 | 16.4 | 94.5 ± 2.2* | The RNFL thickness correlated significantly with both the MMSE and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale scores in AD patients |
| Controls, 10 (20) | 70.0 ± 2.0 | 108.0 ± 2.2 | ||||
| Marziani et al. [ | SD | AD, 21 (21) | 79.3 ± 5.7 | 19.9 ± 3.1 | Macular RNFL and RNFL + GCL thickness measurements are reduced in AD patients compared with healthy subjects | |
| Controls, 21 (21) | 77.0 ± 4.2 | |||||
| Kirbas et al. [ | SD | AD, 40 (80) | 69.3 ± 4.9 | 21.4 | 65.0 ± 6.2* | No correlation between OCT parameters and MMSE |
| Controls, 40 (80) | 68.9 ± 5.1 | 75.0 ± 3.8 | ||||
| Larrosa et al. [ | SD | AD, 151 (151) | 75.3 | 18.3 | 97.5 ± 14.1 | Used two different OCT (cirrus and spectralis) |
| Controls, 61 (61) | 74.9 | 100.6 ± 13 | ||||
| Ascaso et al. [ | TD | AD, 18 (36) | 72.1 ± 8.7 (AD + aMCI) | 19.3 (AD + aMCI) | 64.7 ± 15.2 | The increased thickness and macular volume in aMCI |
| aMCI, 21 (42) | 72.1 ± 8.7 (AD + aMCI) | 19.3 (AD + aMCI) | 86.7 ± 7.18*** | |||
| Controls, 41 (82) | 72.9 | 103.1 ± 8.04 | ||||
| Polo et al. [ | SD | AD, 75 (75) | 74.1 | 16.0 | 97.4 ± 11.2 (cirrus); 98.1 ± 10.7 (spectralis) | SD-OCT protocols were able to detect RNFL and macular atrophy in AD patients |
| Controls, 75 (75) | 73.9 | 99.2 ± 9.9 (cirrus); 101.6 ± 9.5 (spectralis) | ||||
| Kromer et al. [ | SD | AD, 22 (42) | 75.9 ± 6.1 | 22.6 ± 5.5 | 104.3 ± 17.5 | AD patients with mild to moderate stages of showed a significant reduction of RNFL thickness in the nasal superior sector |
| Controls, 22 (42) | 64.0 ± 8.2 | 101.8 ± 10.7 | ||||
| Bambo et al. [ | SD | AD, 56 (56) | 74.0 ± 8.1 | 16.6 | 89.4 ± 10.4** | Presence of optic disc pallor correlate with axonal loss and perfusion alterations in AD |
| Controls, 56 (56) | 76.4 ± 8.4 | 100.9 ± 11.7 | ||||
| Bayhan et al. [ | SD | AD, 31 (31) | 75.8 ± 6.5 | 17.4 ± 4.9 | A significant correlation with the macular GCC parameters and MMSE scores in AD patients | |
| Controls, 30 (30) | 74.9 ± 7.6 | |||||
| Liu et al. [ | TD | AD, 67 (134) | The RNFL thickness in the superior quadrant and total mean values are gradually and significantly decreased from MCI to severe AD | |||
| Mild AD, 24 | 71.3 ± 4.9 | 91.6 ± 10.1* | ||||
| Moderate AD, 24 | 70.8 ± 6 | 91.7 ± 12.4* | ||||
| Severe AD, 19 | 72.1 ± 4.6 | 87.1 ± 17.1*** | ||||
| MCI, 26 (52) | 70.2 ± 6.5 | 95.4 ± 17.1 | ||||
| Controls, 39 (78) | 69.7 ± 7.8 | 100.1 ± 15 | ||||
| Gao et al. [ | SD | AD, 25 (50) | 74.7 ± 1.3 | 19.2 ± 0.6 | 86 ± 1.9** | Reduced macular volume in AD and MCI patients, no correlation between MMSE and OCT parameters |
| aMCI, 25 (50) | 73.4 ± 1.5 | 25.8 ± 0.35 | 92.4 ± 1.9* | |||
| Controls, 21 (42) | 72.1 ± 1 | 98.6 ± 1.7 | ||||
| Oktem et al. [ | SD | AD, 35 (70) | 75.4 ± 6.9 | 18.0 | 80.6 ± 9.6*** | RNFL thickness measurements can be useful for early diagnosis and evaluation of disease progression |
| MCI, 35 (70) | 74.1 ± 6.3 | 28.0 | 82.5 ± 7.3 | |||
| Controls, 35 (70) | 70.2 ± 8.0 | 29.0 | 91.5 ± 7.1 | |||
| Salobrar-Garcia et al. [ | SD | AD, 23 (23) | 79.3 ± 4.6 | 23.3 ± 3.1 | Increase in peripapillary thickness in mild-AD patients | |
| Controls, 28 (28) | 72.3 ± 5.1 | |||||
| Cunha et al. [ | SD | AD, 24 (45) | 74.8 ± 6.2 | 17.0 ± 5.2 | 93.7 ± 13.4 | Neuronal loss, especially for macular parameters, correlated well with cognitive impairment in AD |
| Controls, 24 (48) | 72.3 ± 7.3 | 103 ± 9.2 | ||||
| Garcia-Martin et al. [ | SD | AD, 150 (150) | 75.33 | 18.35 ± 3.33 | 95.7 ± 15.22 | Performed segmentation of all retinal layers. Inner retinal layers reduction may predict greater disease severity |
| Controls, 75 (75) | 74.79 | 99.23 ± 16.48 | ||||
| Choi et al. [ | SD | AD, 42 (42) | 76.8 ± 8.7 | 14.5 ± 5.5 | Performed segmentation of all retinal layers | |
| MCI, 26 (26) | 74.7 ± 7.8 | 23.1 ± 4.6 | 86.6 ± 10.2 | |||
| Controls, 66 (66) | 73.8 ± 7.5 |
AD Alzheimer’s disease, MCI mild cognitive impairment, aMCI amnestic mild cognitive impairment, RNFL retinal nerve fiber layer, OCT optical coherence tomography, SD standard deviation, TD time-domain, SD (OCT type column) spectral domain, MMSE mini mental state examination, PERG pattern-reversal electroretinogram, GCL ganglion cell layer, GCC ganglion cell complex
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 when compared to controls
Fig. 1Examples of Topcon 3D OCT-2000 generated full-thickness macular measurements in the right (OD) and left (OS) eye of a patient with Alzheimer’s disease. Measurements in different sectors are indicated with numbers and represented in colors that correspond to the normal distribution. Sectors in green indicate values within normal range; in yellow less than the 5th, in red less than the 1st compared with an age-matched reference population. Note that several macular thickness parameters are below normal range, particularly in inner segments
Fig. 2A print out of inner macular analysis using SD-OCT in a patient with Alzheimer disease. The built-in viewer shows the color retinography, oct line scan, macular RNFL thickness (mRNFL), the ganglion cell layer + inner plexiform layer (GCL+) thickness, and the RNFL + GCL + IPL (GCL++) thickness. a Fundus color. The green square line demarcates the macular area scanned (7 × 7 mm) by the FD-OCT. b Optical coherence tomography (vertical scan) of macular area. Center pseudo-colored map of the measured thickness. Lower each grid in the 10 × 10 grid was color coded with no color (within the normal limit), yellow (outside of the 95 % normal limit), or red (outside of the 99 % normal limit)
Fig. 3Example of inner macular thickness measurements by SD-OCT of AD patient. On the left (a, c, e) represents the scanned area (7 × 7 mm). Each 10 × 10 grid was color coded with no color (within the normal limit), yellow (outside the 95 % normal limit), or red (outside the 99 % normal limit). The total analyzed area corresponding to 6 × 6 mm. On the right vertical OCT scans through the fovea. The white lines correspond to the boundaries of the inner retinal layers identified during the segmentation process. b Macular RNFL (mRNFL) thickness measurement, through the internal limiting membrane (ILM) to inner boundary of ganglion cell layer (GCL). d GCL plus inner plexiform layer (IPL), through the inner boundary of GCL to outer boundary of IPL (GCL+). f mRNFL plus GCL plus IPL, trough the ILM to outer boundary of IPL (GCL++)