Literature DB >> 27847550

A Split-Face Evaluation to Assess the Efficacy of a Hydrolyzed Roe Cream in the Reduction of Erythema Following Chemical Peel.

Vic A Narurkar1.   

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate a hydrolyzed roe cream in the reduction of facial erythema following a chemical peel treatment. Edema was also assessed. Design:The facial cream was applied to one side of the face of 30 healthy female subjects (average age = 54.9 years, range 33-65 years) immediately following 4 to 15 minutes peel treatment. The opposite side remained untreated. Visia-CR digital photographs were taken at baseline and 8 and 24 hours post facial peel. Objective dermal irritation assessments were done by a blinded investigator, graded on severity of facial erythema and edema on a 5-point scoring scale; 0=none, 1 =slight,2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe. Subjects completed a perception questionnaire.
Results: Reduction in erythema was greater (P≤0.05) for the treated side of the face compared to the untreated side at both 8 and 24 hours post-peel. Both sides showed reduction in erythema compared to immediate post-peel. No edema was observed. At eight hours, more than 50 percent of subjects agreed on the five attributes, and at 24 hours, 57 percent (17/30) of subjects agreed. At eight hours, ≥80 percent of subjects strongly agreed or agreed that the treated skin feels hydrated and moisturized immediately after application. At 24 hours, more than 90 percent of subjects strongly agreed or agreed that treated skin feels perfectly hydrated and moisturized. When asked about their overall impression of the product, 60 percent (18 subjects) of subjects responded"! love it."All subjects completed the study. No adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: Applying the facial lotion directly on post-procedure skin reduces redness after 8 and 24 hours significantly better compared to no treatment.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27847550      PMCID: PMC5104313     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol        ISSN: 1941-2789


  12 in total

Review 1.  Chemical peels.

Authors:  Gary D Monheit
Journal:  Skin Therapy Lett       Date:  2004-02

2.  Evidence and considerations in the application of chemical peels in skin disorders and aesthetic resurfacing.

Authors:  Marta I Rendon; Diane S Berson; Joel L Cohen; Wendy E Roberts; Isaac Starker; Beatrice Wang
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2010-07

3.  Chemical peels.

Authors:  Adrianna Jackson
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.446

4.  Glycolic acid peels for the treatment of wrinkles and photoaging.

Authors:  L S Moy; H Murad; R L Moy
Journal:  J Dermatol Surg Oncol       Date:  1993-03

Review 5.  Role of mild cleansing in the management of patient skin.

Authors:  Kumar Subramanyan
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.851

6.  Standard guidelines of care for chemical peels.

Authors:  Niti Khunger
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  An Evaluation of Efficacy and Tolerability of Novel Enzyme Exfoliation Versus Glycolic Acid in Photodamage Treatment.

Authors:  Maria Mekas; Jennifer Chwalek; Jennifer MacGregor; Anne Chapas
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.114

8.  Applications of hydroxy acids: classification, mechanisms, and photoactivity.

Authors:  Andrija Kornhauser; Sergio G Coelho; Vincent J Hearing
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2010-11-24

9.  Prevention of complications in chemical peeling.

Authors:  B Anitha
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2010-09

10.  Complications of medium depth and deep chemical peels.

Authors:  Nanma Nikalji; Kiran Godse; Jagdish Sakhiya; Sharmila Patil; Nitin Nadkarni
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.