Zobair M Younossi1, Maria Stepanova2, Jordan Feld3, Stefan Zeuzem4, Mark Sulkowski5, Graham R Foster6, Alessandra Mangia7, Michael Charlton8, Jacqueline G O'Leary9, Michael P Curry10, Fatema Nader2, Linda Henry2, Sharon Hunt2. 1. Center for Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia. Electronic address: zobair.younossi@inova.org. 2. Center for Outcomes Research, Washington, District of Columbia. 3. Toronto Center for Liver Disease, Toronto, Canada. 4. Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 5. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom. 7. Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy. 8. Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah. 9. Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 10. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir is used to treat patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection of different genotypes. We compared the effects of this treatment regimen, with and without ribavirin, on outcomes reported by patients (patient-reported outcomes [PROs]) with HCV infection, with or without cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of data collected from phase 3 clinical trials (ASTRAL-1, -2, -3, and -4) of 1701 patients infected with HCV of different genotypes treated with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir with ribavirin for 12 weeks (n = 87), sofosbuvir with ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks (n = 401), and ribavirin-free sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for 12 or 24 weeks (n = 1213). In all trials, participants completed 4 PRO questionnaires (while blinded to their HCV RNA levels): the Short Form-36, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-HCV Version, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem, at multiple time points. We compared baseline PROs and changes in PROs following treatment in patients without cirrhosis (n = 1112), with compensated cirrhosis (n = 338), and with decompensated cirrhosis (n = 251). RESULTS: Baseline PRO scores were as much as 33.5% lower in patients with decompensated cirrhosis than in patients without cirrhosis (P < .05). Following treatment with ribavirin-containing regimens, changes in PRO scores were similar among patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis (all P > .01). Treatment with these regimens increased some PRO scores by as much as 11.8% from baseline (P < .05) and reduced others, by as much as 7.1% (P < .05). Despite this, by 12 weeks after cessation of treatment with ribavirin-containing regimens, all PRO decrements resolved; PRO scores increased by as much as 14.2%, and as much as 17.1% at 24 weeks after treatment, regardless of cirrhosis status (all P > .01 between cirrhosis groups). In contrast, treatment with ribavirin-free sofosbuvir and velpatasvir increased PRO scores for patients with compensated cirrhosis, and even more so in patients with decompensated cirrhosis starting at treatment Week 4; no statistically significant decrement was observed at any time point (all 1-sided P values > .05). In multivariate analysis, compensated cirrhosis was associated with a 2.3% to 5.0% greater increase in PRO scores following treatment with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir (P < .05); decompensated cirrhosis was associated with a 5.5%-9.1% greater increase (P < .002). Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT02201940, NCT02220998, NCT02201953, NCT02201901. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from 4 phase 3 clinical trials, we found that patients with HCV infection (especially those with decompensated cirrhosis) have significant increases in their PRO scores during treatment with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir and after achieving a sustained virologic response.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir is used to treat patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection of different genotypes. We compared the effects of this treatment regimen, with and without ribavirin, on outcomes reported by patients (patient-reported outcomes [PROs]) with HCV infection, with or without cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of data collected from phase 3 clinical trials (ASTRAL-1, -2, -3, and -4) of 1701 patients infected with HCV of different genotypes treated with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir with ribavirin for 12 weeks (n = 87), sofosbuvir with ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks (n = 401), and ribavirin-free sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for 12 or 24 weeks (n = 1213). In all trials, participants completed 4 PRO questionnaires (while blinded to their HCV RNA levels): the Short Form-36, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-HCV Version, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem, at multiple time points. We compared baseline PROs and changes in PROs following treatment in patients without cirrhosis (n = 1112), with compensated cirrhosis (n = 338), and with decompensated cirrhosis (n = 251). RESULTS: Baseline PRO scores were as much as 33.5% lower in patients with decompensated cirrhosis than in patients without cirrhosis (P < .05). Following treatment with ribavirin-containing regimens, changes in PRO scores were similar among patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis (all P > .01). Treatment with these regimens increased some PRO scores by as much as 11.8% from baseline (P < .05) and reduced others, by as much as 7.1% (P < .05). Despite this, by 12 weeks after cessation of treatment with ribavirin-containing regimens, all PRO decrements resolved; PRO scores increased by as much as 14.2%, and as much as 17.1% at 24 weeks after treatment, regardless of cirrhosis status (all P > .01 between cirrhosis groups). In contrast, treatment with ribavirin-free sofosbuvir and velpatasvir increased PRO scores for patients with compensated cirrhosis, and even more so in patients with decompensated cirrhosis starting at treatment Week 4; no statistically significant decrement was observed at any time point (all 1-sided P values > .05). In multivariate analysis, compensated cirrhosis was associated with a 2.3% to 5.0% greater increase in PRO scores following treatment with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir (P < .05); decompensated cirrhosis was associated with a 5.5%-9.1% greater increase (P < .002). Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT02201940, NCT02220998, NCT02201953, NCT02201901. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from 4 phase 3 clinical trials, we found that patients with HCV infection (especially those with decompensated cirrhosis) have significant increases in their PRO scores during treatment with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir and after achieving a sustained virologic response.
Authors: Matthew J Akiyama; Brianna L Norton; Julia H Arnsten; Linda Agyemang; Moonseong Heo; Alain H Litwin Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Iman Ibrahim Salama; Hala M Raslan; Ghada A Abdel-Latif; Somaia I Salama; Samia M Sami; Fatma A Shaaban; Aida M Abdelmohsen; Walaa A Fouad Journal: World J Hepatol Date: 2022-06-27
Authors: Sofia Volpato; Sara Montagnese; Alberto Zanetto; Matteo Turco; Michele De Rui; Alberto Ferrarese; Piero Amodio; Giacomo Germani; Marco Senzolo; Martina Gambato; Francesco Paolo Russo; Patrizia Burra Journal: BMJ Open Gastroenterol Date: 2017-12-21
Authors: Peter Nguyen; Philip Vutien; Joseph Hoang; Sam Trinh; An Le; Lee Ann Yasukawa; Susan Weber; Linda Henry; Mindie H Nguyen Journal: BMJ Open Gastroenterol Date: 2017-12-20
Authors: Fatih Karbeyaz; Seraphina Kissling; Paul Julius Jaklin; Jaqueline Bachofner; Barbara Brunner; Beat Müllhaupt; Thomas Winder; Joachim C Mertens; Benjamin Misselwitz; Stefanie von Felten; Alexander R Siebenhüner Journal: J Hepatocell Carcinoma Date: 2021-06-11