| Literature DB >> 27846291 |
Serdar Dirihan1, Marjo Helander1,2, Henry Väre3, Pedro E Gundel4, Lucas A Garibaldi5, J Gonzalo N Irisarri4, Irma Saloniemi1, Kari Saikkonen2.
Abstract
Polyploidy and symbiotic Epichloë fungal endophytes are common and heritable characteristics that can facilitate environmental range expansion in grasses. Here we examined geographic patterns of polyploidy and the frequency of fungal endophyte colonized plants in 29 Festuca rubra L. populations from eight geographic sites across latitudes from Spain to northernmost Finland and Greenland. Ploidy seemed to be positively and negatively correlated with latitude and productivity, respectively. However, the correlations were nonlinear; 84% of the plants were hexaploids (2n = 6x = 42), and the positive correlation between ploidy level and latitude is the result of only four populations skewing the data. In the southernmost end of the gradient 86% of the plants were tetraploids (2n = 4x = 28), whereas in the northernmost end of the gradient one population had only octoploid plants (2n = 8x = 56). Endophytes were detected in 22 out of the 29 populations. Endophyte frequencies varied among geographic sites, and populations and habitats within geographic sites irrespective of ploidy, latitude or productivity. The highest overall endophyte frequencies were found in the southernmost end of the gradient, Spain, where 69% of plants harbored endophytes. In northern Finland, endophytes were detected in 30% of grasses but endophyte frequencies varied among populations from 0% to 75%, being higher in meadows compared to riverbanks. The endophytes were detected in 36%, 30% and 27% of the plants in Faroe Islands, Iceland and Switzerland, respectively. Practically all examined plants collected from southern Finland and Greenland were endophyte-free, whereas in other geographic sites endophyte frequencies were highly variable among populations. Common to all populations with high endophyte frequencies is heavy vertebrate grazing. We propose that the detected endophyte frequencies and ploidy levels mirror past distribution history of F. rubra after the last glaciation period, and local adaptations to past or prevailing selection forces such as vertebrate grazing.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27846291 PMCID: PMC5112939 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The collection sites of Festuca rubra plants and their attributes.
N = number of collected plants. Mean NDVI = mean normalized difference vegetation index estimated from year 2000 to 2012. Inf. % = percentage of endophyte infected plants (endophyte frequency) in population. 4x %, 6x % and 8x % = percentage of tetraploids, hexaploids and octoploids, respectively, in population.
| Population code | Geographic site | Population | N | Geographic coordinates | Altitude (m a.s.l.) | Mean NDVI | Inf. % | 4x % | 6x % | 8x % | Features of the site | Grazing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP1 | Spain | Cáceres | 31 | N 40°12'1'' W 5°45'11'' | 768 | 0,59 | 81 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Xerophytic forest | High (cattle) |
| SP2 | Spain | Salamanca 1 | 27 | N 40°56'20'' W 6°7'6'' | 863 | 0,57 | 67 | 78 | 22 | 0 | Meadow | High (cattle) |
| SP3 | Spain | Salamanca 2 | 37 | N 40°58'24'' W 5°57'33'' | 812 | 0,51 | 59 | 81 | 3 | 16 | Meadow | High (cattle) |
| SW1 | Switzerland | Andermatt | 26 | N 46°32'19'' E 8°40'31'' | 1500 | 0,42 | 23 | 0 | 96 | 4 | Meadow with natural grassland vegetation, slope facing east | High (cattle) |
| SW2 | Switzerland | Biez | 25 | N 46°37'42'' E 8°35'26'' | 1600 | 0,41 | 36 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Meadow with natural grassland vegetation, slope facing north-west | High (cattle) |
| SW3 | Switzerland | Piasca | 23 | N 46°53'56'' E 8°42'9'' | 1850 | 0,19 | 22 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Meadow with natural grassland vegetation, sawed every second year, slope facing south | High (cattle) |
| FI1 | Southern Finland | Hanko 1 | 42 | N 59°50'23'' E 23°13'40'' | 0 | 0,55 | 0 | 2 | 98 | 0 | Meadow along the coast | Low |
| FI2 | Southern Finland | Hanko 2 | 44 | N 59°50'27'' E 23°13'15'' | 0 | 0,53 | 0 | 0 | 93 | 7 | Meadow along the coast | Low |
| FI3 | Southern Finland | Hanko 3 | 40 | N 59°53'0'' E 23°5'52'' | 0 | 0,43 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 0 | Meadow along the coast | Low |
| FO1 | Faroe | Sandoy | 39 | N 61°50'11'' W 6°51'21'' | 69 | 0,42 | 21 | 3 | 97 | 0 | Meadow | High (sheep) |
| FO2 | Faroe | Nolsoy | 41 | N 62°1'15'' W 6°41'8'' | 55 | 0,33 | 5 | 0 | 98 | 2 | Meadow | High (sheep) |
| FO3 | Faroe | Mykines | 37 | N 62°5'51'' W 7°40'56'' | 125 | 0,16 | 68 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Meadow | High (sheep) |
| FO4 | Faroe | Vagar | 24 | N 62°6'59'' W 7°26'43'' | 246 | 0,30 | 25 | 0 | 83 | 17 | Meadow | High (sheep) |
| FO5 | Faroe | Eysturoy | 39 | N 62°17'24'' W 7°2'10'' | 316 | 0,34 | 54 | 5 | 87 | 8 | Meadow | High (sheep) |
| FO6 | Faroe | Vidoy | 32 | N 62°22'3'' W 6°32'32'' | 148 | 0,31 | 44 | 9 | 91 | 0 | Meadow | High (sheep) |
| IC1 | Iceland | Iceland 1 | 44 | N 64°47'34'' W 21°32'0'' | 390 | 0,28 | 32 | 2 | 98 | 0 | Meadow | High (sheep) |
| IC2 | Iceland | Iceland 2 | 34 | N 64°48'52'' W 23°23'14'' | 10 | 0,34 | 32 | 0 | 97 | 3 | Meadow | High (sheep) |
| IC3 | Iceland | Iceland 3 | 42 | N 66°1'21'' W 20°23'39'' | 38 | 0,30 | 26 | 5 | 95 | 2 | Meadow | High (sheep) |
| GR1 | Greenland | Greenland 1 | 70 | N 69°14'59'' W 53°31'15'' | 0 | 0,16 | 3 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Meadow along the coast | Low |
| GR2 | Greenland | Greenland 2 | 10 | N 69°15'27'' W 53°32'40'' | 0 | 0,19 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Meadow along the coast | Low |
| FI4 | Northern Finland 1 | Halti 1 | 22 | N 69°15'0'' E 21°24'36'' | 860 | 0,20 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Meadows along rivulets above tree-line with patchy grass and sedge dominated vegetation | Moderate (reindeer) |
| FI5 | Northern Finland 1 | Halti 2 | 42 | N 69°15'0'' E 21°19'12'' | 900 | 0,11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Moderate (reindeer) | |
| FI6 | Northern Finland 1 | Halti 3 | 32 | N 69°16'12'' E 21°19'12'' | 920 | 0,28 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Moderate (reindeer) | |
| FI7 | Northern Finland 2 | Kevo 1 | 34 | N 69°38'6'' E 27°5'1'' | 91 | 0,31 | 56 | 3 | 97 | 0 | Meadow | High (reindeer) |
| FI8 | Northern Finland 2 | Kevo 2 | 40 | N 69°43'56'' E 27°12'0'' | 85 | 0,31 | 75 | 3 | 85 | 13 | Meadow | High (reindeer) |
| FI9 | Northern Finland 2 | Kevo 3 | 34 | N 69°45'32'' E 26°59'19'' | 107 | 0,31 | 50 | 0 | 94 | 6 | Meadow | High (reindeer) |
| FI10 | Northern Finland 2 | Kevo 4 | 42 | N 69°54'36'' E 27°1'48'' | 73 | 0,27 | 45 | 2 | 98 | 0 | Riverbank | High (reindeer) |
| FI11 | Northern Finland 2 | Kevo 5 | 31 | N 69°56'11'' E 26°27'45'' | 106 | 0,28 | 23 | 0 | 94 | 6 | Riverbank | High (reindeer) |
| FI12 | Northern Finland 2 | Kevo 6 | 35 | N 69°56'41'' E 26°43'22'' | 85 | 0,29 | 20 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Riverbank | High (reindeer) |
Fig 1Monthly mean normalized difference vegetation index (mean NDVI) values for the Festuca rubra collection sites (for population codes see Table 1) from February 2000 to December 2012.
Fig 2The effect of latitude (a) and mean normalized difference vegetation index (mean NDVI) (b) on mean ploidy of Festuca rubra populations. Fitted regression line in (a) is for illustrative purpose since statistical tests are suggestive due to problems of normality in the data.
Fig 3Collection sites and endophyte infection frequencies of Festuca rubra populations.
Infection frequency circles are shown with the population codes (Table 1).
Effects of ploidy, latitude, altitude and interaction between latitude and altitude (Lat x Alt) on endophyte status of Festuca rubra plants.
| Estimate | Std. Error | z value | Pr (> |z|) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | -4.78 | 5.08 | 0.94 | 0.35 |
| Ploidy | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1.48 | 0.14 |
| Latitude | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.44 | 0.65 |
| Altitude | 0.01 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 0.04 |
| Lat x Alt | -0.00 | 0.00 | -2.14 | 0.03 |
*, p<0.05
**, p<0.01
***, p<0.001
Fig 4The relationship between latitude and endophyte infection frequencies of Festuca rubra populations.
Dots are shown with the population codes (Table 1). Fitted regression line is shown, but statistical test is suggestive due to problems of normality in the data.
Fig 5Regression plot of mean normalized difference vegetation index (mean NDVI) against endophyte infection frequencies of Festuca rubra populations.
Dots are shown with the population codes (Table 1).
Fig 6Regression plot of latitude against mean normalized difference vegetation index (mean NDVI) of Festuca rubra populations circled by geographic sites (Table 1).