| Literature DB >> 27846268 |
Yuezhi Pan1,2, Xueqin Wang3, Guiling Sun4, Fusheng Li2, Xun Gong1.
Abstract
Panax notoginseng, a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, has been cultivated and domesticated for approximately 400 years, mainly in Yunnan and Guangxi, two provinces in southwest China. This species was named according to cultivated rather than wild individuals, and no wild populations had been found until now. The genetic resources available on farms are important for both breeding practices and resource conservation. In the present study, the recently developed technology RADseq, which is based on next-generation sequencing, was used to analyze the genetic variation and differentiation of P. notoginseng. The nucleotide diversity and heterozygosity results indicated that P. notoginseng had low genetic diversity at both the species and population levels. Almost no genetic differentiation has been detected, and all populations were genetically similar due to strong gene flow and insufficient splitting time. Although the genetic diversity of P. notoginseng was low at both species and population levels, several traditional plantations had relatively high genetic diversity, as revealed by the He and π values and by the private allele numbers. These valuable genetic resources should be protected as soon as possible to facilitate future breeding projects. The possible geographical origin of Sanqi domestication was discussed based on the results of the genetic diversity analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27846268 PMCID: PMC5112861 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Sample locations of Panax notoginseng.
The statistical values of genetic diversity within populations from variant and all positions data with p = 6/r = 1.
| Pop | Private | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code | variant positions | all positions | variant positions | all positions | variant positions | all positions | variant positions | all positions | |
| NP | 824 | 0.1997 | 0.0017 | 0.1650 | 0.0014 | 0.2020 | 0.0017 | 0.0045 | 0.0000 |
| DH | 182 | 0.1489 | 0.0013 | 0.1267 | 0.0011 | 0.1571 | 0.0013 | 0.0156 | 0.0001 |
| MT | 581 | 0.1691 | 0.0013 | 0.1436 | 0.0011 | 0.1750 | 0.0014 | 0.0116 | 0.0001 |
| DP | 259 | 0.1625 | 0.0013 | 0.1244 | 0.0010 | 0.1531 | 0.0012 | -0.0114 | -0.0001 |
| YL | 432 | 0.1628 | 0.0013 | 0.1434 | 0.0012 | 0.1755 | 0.0014 | 0.0256 | 0.0002 |
| DL | 268 | 0.1492 | 0.0012 | 0.1261 | 0.0010 | 0.1557 | 0.0012 | 0.0140 | 0.0001 |
| BZ | 252 | 0.1586 | 0.0012 | 0.1266 | 0.0010 | 0.1560 | 0.0012 | -0.0039 | 0.0000 |
| RL | 286 | 0.1504 | 0.0011 | 0.1361 | 0.0010 | 0.1660 | 0.0013 | 0.0282 | 0.0002 |
| PL | 517 | 0.1796 | 0.0015 | 0.1444 | 0.0012 | 0.1767 | 0.0015 | -0.0038 | -0.0000 |
| CF | 199 | 0.1508 | 0.0011 | 0.1197 | 0.0009 | 0.1473 | 0.0011 | -0.0050 | -0.0000 |
| ZL | 472 | 0.1560 | 0.0012 | 0.1267 | 0.0010 | 0.1550 | 0.0012 | -0.0007 | -0.0000 |
| GH | 444 | 0.1681 | 0.0013 | 0.1393 | 0.0011 | 0.1693 | 0.0014 | 0.0045 | 0.0000 |
Note: private, private allele number; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; π, nucleotide diversity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient of an individual relative to the subpopulation.
Fig 2The distribution of private allele numbers among populations with p = 6/r = 1.
Fig 3Distribution of genetic diversity indices, including observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He) and nucleotide diversity (π) with p = 6/r = 1.
(A)Genetic diversity indices were based on variant position data, and on (B) all position data.
Pairwise comparison of genetic distances (FST values) among P. notoginseng populations with p = 6/r = 1.
| Pop code | DH | MT | DP | YL | DL | BZ | RL | PL | CF | ZL | GH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP | 0.0016 | 0.0043 | 0.0080 | 0.0056 | 0.0041 | 0.0057 | 0.0023 | 0.0080 | 0.0020 | 0.0050 | 0.0128 |
| DH | 0.0063 | 0.0039 | 0.0074 | 0.0026 | 0.0058 | 0.0016 | 0.0063 | 0.0024 | 0.0053 | 0.0121 | |
| MT | 0.0077 | 0.0115 | 0.0080 | 0.0059 | 0.0080 | 0.0051 | 0.0040 | 0.0016 | 0.0129 | ||
| DP | 0.0036 | 0.0056 | 0.0056 | 0.0025 | 0.0072 | 0.0077 | 0.0065 | 0.0175 | |||
| YL | 0.0060 | 0.0046 | 0.0022 | 0.0020 | 0.0032 | 0.0053 | 0.0114 | ||||
| DL | 0.0059 | 0.0030 | 0.0033 | 0.0017 | 0.0034 | 0.0193 | |||||
| BZ | 0.0047 | 0.0027 | 0.0023 | 0.0021 | 0.0047 | ||||||
| RL | 0.0072 | 0.0067 | 0.0025 | 0.0099 | |||||||
| PL | 0.0024 | 0.0048 | 0.0063 | ||||||||
| CF | 0.0056 | 0.0075 | |||||||||
| ZL | 0.0087 |
Fig 4A neighbor-joining (NJ) tree created using pairwise FST values as distance metrics with p = 6/r = 1.
The results of the AMOVA analysis.
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage variation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 1.597 | 0.00429 | 3.46939 |
| Within populations | 7.167 | 0.11944 | 96.53061 |
| Total | 8.764 | 0.12374 |
Fig 5Bayesian inference of the number of clusters (K) of Panax notoginseng based on Structure analysis.
Fig 6Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot generated by adegenet.
The demographic parameters estimated using IM model.
| Value | θ1 | θ2 | θA | m1 | m2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HiPt | 0.6683 | 2.1004 | 1770.7055 | 0.0010 | 0.0015 |
| HiSmith | 0.7320 | 2.1004 | 1770.7055 | 0.0010 | 0.0015 |
| HPD90Lo | 0.0955 | 0.4455 | 1376.0838 | 0.0010 | 0.0015 |
| HPD90Hi | 3.1506 | 7.8288 | 2330.8136 | 1.7050 | 2.0265 |