| Literature DB >> 27845327 |
Jianping Ji1, Xiufeng Song1,2, Jizi Liu1,2, Zhong Yan1,2, Chengxue Huo1, Shengli Zhang1,2, Meng Su3, Lei Liao3, Wenhui Wang4, Zhenhua Ni4, Yufeng Hao5,6, Haibo Zeng1,2.
Abstract
Unlike the unstable black phosphorous, another two-dimensional group-VA material, antimonene, was recently predicted to exhibit good stability and remarkable physical properties. However, the synthesis of high-quality monolayer or few-layer antimonenes, sparsely reported, has greatly hindered the development of this new field. Here, we report the van der Waals epitaxy growth of few-layer antimonene monocrystalline polygons, their atomical microstructure and stability in ambient condition. The high-quality, few-layer antimonene monocrystalline polygons can be synthesized on various substrates, including flexible ones, via van der Waals epitaxy growth. Raman spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy reveal that the obtained antimonene polygons have buckled rhombohedral atomic structure, consistent with the theoretically predicted most stable β-phase allotrope. The very high stability of antimonenes was observed after aging in air for 30 days. First-principle and molecular dynamics simulation results confirmed that compared with phosphorene, antimonene is less likely to be oxidized and possesses higher thermodynamic stability in oxygen atmosphere at room temperature. Moreover, antimonene polygons show high electrical conductivity up to 104 S m-1 and good optical transparency in the visible light range, promising in transparent conductive electrode applications.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27845327 PMCID: PMC5116078 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Antimonene polygons synthesized on mica substrates via van der Waals epitaxy.
(a) Schematic illustration of the sample synthesis configurations. (b) Schematic diagram of van der Waals epitaxy. (c–f) Optical images of typical antimonene polygons with triangular, hexagonal, rhombic and trapezoidal shapes, respectively. The scale bar is 5 μm. (g) AFM image of a typical triangular antimonene sheet. The thicknesses are 4 nm. The scale bar is 1 μm. (h) AFM image of a tiny antimonene sheet. The thicknesss is ca. 1 nm. The scale bar is 50 nm.
Figure 2Atomic structure of synthesized antimonene polygons.
(a) Schematic illustrations of the atomic structure of β-phase antimonene. (b) Low-magnification TEM image of a well shaped antimonene sheet transferred onto copper grid. The scale bar is 1 um. (c) Sb element mapping. Sb content is measured to be 94 wt.%. The scale bar is 1 um. (d) O element mapping. O is measured to be 4%. The scale bar is 1 um. (e) HRTEM image. Inset: SAED pattern along the [001] zone axis. The scale bar of the HRTEM image is 2 nm. (f) Enlarged image of few-layer antimonene in e. The scale bar is 0.5 nm. (g) Simulated HRTEM image of few-layer antimonene. The scale bar is 0.5 nm.
Figure 4Stability verification via experiments and simulations of antimonene compared with BP.
(a) Optical images, AFM images and Raman spectra of antimonene layers before and after a 30-day aging. The scale bar is 2 um. (b) EDS analysis of antimonene sheets randomly selected om the copper grid before and after a 30-day aging. (c) Atomic structure of phosphorene oxide (O=P2D=O) and time-dependent snapshots of the configurations revealing interaction of O2 with phosphorene. (d) Atomic structure of phosphorene oxide (O=Sb2D=O) and time-dependent snapshots of the configurations revealing interaction of O2 with antimonene.
Figure 3Raman spectroscopy of antimonene polygons.
(a) Raman spectra of bulk antimony (β-phase), few-layer antimonene and antimony trioxide. Inset: the vibrational modes of β-phase antimonene. (b) Raman spectra of antimonene polygons with thicknesses varying from 5 nm to bulk. (c) A1g, Eg peak frequencies (left vertical axis) and the energy difference (right vertical axis) of those two peaks plotted against sample thickness. The energy difference between the A1g and Eg peaks increases monotonically with sample thickness.
Figure 5The flexible transparent conductivity of antimonene polygons.
(a) Schematic illustration of top-gated antimonene thin film transistors. (b) Optical image of a typical device fabricated on a triangular antimonene sheet. (c) Ids–Vds characteristics of three tested devices acquired at Vg=0 V. Inset: Ids–Vg curve of the 30-nm thick antimonene device acquired at 0.05 V bias voltage. (d) Electrical conductivity of the tested device after bending. Inset: Photograph of bended antimonene devices on mica substrate. (e) Transmittance spectra of three typical antimonene polygons of 4, 7 and 18 nm thicknesses, respectively. (f) Transmittance of antimonene polygons versus sample thickness.