Literature DB >> 27843735

Interhemispheric Difference Images from Postoperative Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Gliomas.

Robert Kosztyla1, Stefan A Reinsberg2, Vitali Moiseenko3, Brian Toyota4, Alan Nichol5.   

Abstract

Introduction Determining the full extent of gliomas during radiotherapy planning can be challenging with conventional T1 and T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of this study was to develop a method to automatically calculate differences in the fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) values in target volumes obtained with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) by comparing with values from anatomically homologous voxels on the contralateral side of the brain. Methods Seven patients with a histologically confirmed glioma underwent postoperative radiotherapy planning with 1.5 T MRI and computed tomography. DTI was acquired using echo planar imaging for 20 noncolinear directions with b = 1000 s/mm2 and one additional image with b = 0, repeated four times for signal averaging. The distribution of FA and MD was calculated in the gross tumor volume (GTV), shells 0-5 mm, 5-10 mm, 10-15 mm, 15-20 mm, and 20-25 mm outside the GTV, and the GTV mirrored in the left-right direction (mirGTV). All images were aligned to a template image, and FA and MD interhemispheric difference images were calculated. The difference in mean FA and MD between the regions of interest was statistically tested using two-sided paired t-tests with α = 0.05. Results The mean FA in mirGTV was 0.20 ± 0.04, which was larger than the FA in the GTV (0.12 ± 0.03) and shells 0-5 mm (0.15 ± 0.03) and 5-10 mm (0.17 ± 0.03) outside the GTV. The mean MD (×10-3 mm2/s) in mirGTV was 0.93 ± 0.09, which was smaller than the MD in the GTV (1.48 ± 0.19) and the peritumoral shells. The distribution of FA and MD interhemispheric differences followed the same trends as FA and MD values. Conclusions This study successfully implemented a method for calculation of FA and MD differences by comparison of voxel values with anatomically homologous voxels on the contralateral side of the brain. Further research is warranted to determine if radiotherapy planning using these images can be used to improve target delineation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion tensor imaging; glioma; image analysis; magnetic resonance imaging; target volumes

Year:  2016        PMID: 27843735      PMCID: PMC5096944          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  25 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Detection of inter-hemispheric asymmetries of brain perfusion in SPECT.

Authors:  B Aubert-Broche; C Grova; P Jannin; I Buvat; H Benali; B Gibaud
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  T E J Behrens; M W Woolrich; M Jenkinson; H Johansen-Berg; R G Nunes; S Clare; P M Matthews; J M Brady; S M Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Evaluation of diffusion parameters as early biomarkers of disease progression in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Inas S Khayal; Mei-Yin C Polley; Llewellyn Jalbert; Adam Elkhaled; Susan M Chang; Soonmee Cha; Nicholas A Butowski; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Fractional anisotropy value by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of cell density and proliferation activity of glioblastomas.

Authors:  Takaaki Beppu; Takashi Inoue; Yuji Shibata; Noriyuki Yamada; Akira Kurose; Kuniaki Ogasawara; Akira Ogawa; Hiroyuki Kabasawa
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2005-01

7.  The clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging in 3-dimensional treatment planning of brain neoplasms.

Authors:  A F Thornton; H M Sandler; R K Ten Haken; D L McShan; B A Fraass; M L La Vigne; B R Yanke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Preoperative grading of presumptive low-grade astrocytomas on MR imaging: diagnostic value of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient.

Authors:  E J Lee; S K Lee; R Agid; J M Bae; A Keller; K Terbrugge
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  High-grade glioma radiation therapy target volumes and patterns of failure obtained from magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-FDOPA positron emission tomography delineations from multiple observers.

Authors:  Robert Kosztyla; Elisa K Chan; Fred Hsu; Don Wilson; Roy Ma; Arthur Cheung; Susan Zhang; Vitali Moiseenko; Francois Benard; Alan Nichol
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cerebral Microstructural Alterations after Radiation Therapy in High-Grade Glioma: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging-Based Study.

Authors:  Rebecca Kassubek; Martin Gorges; Mike-Andrew Westhoff; Albert C Ludolph; Jan Kassubek; Hans-Peter Müller
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.003

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.