Literature DB >> 1429103

The clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging in 3-dimensional treatment planning of brain neoplasms.

A F Thornton1, H M Sandler, R K Ten Haken, D L McShan, B A Fraass, M L La Vigne, B R Yanke.   

Abstract

Results of the clinical experience gained since 1986 in the treatment planning of patients with brain neoplasms through integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into computerized tomography (CT)-based, three-dimensional treatment planning are presented. Data from MRI can now be fully registered with CT data using appropriate three-dimensional coordinate transformations allowing: (a) display of MRI defined structures on CT images; (b) treatment planning of composite CT-MRI volumes; (c) dose display on either CT or MRI images. Treatment planning with non-coplanar beam arrangements is also facilitated by MRI because of direct acquisition of information in multiple, orthogonal planes. The advantages of this integration of information are especially evident in certain situations, for example, low grade astrocytomas with indistinct CT margins, tumors with margins obscured by bone artifact on CT scan. Target definitions have repeatedly been altered based on MRI detected abnormalities not visualized on CT scans. Regions of gadolinium enhancement on MRI T1-weighted scans can be compared to the contrast-enhancing CT tumor volumes, while abnormalities detected on MRI T2-weighted scans are the counterpart of CT-defined edema. Generally, MRI markedly increased the apparent macroscopic tumor volume from that seen on contrast-CT alone. However, CT tumor information was also necessary as it defined abnormalities not always perceptible with MRI (on average, 19% of composite CT-MRI volume seen on CT only). In all, the integration of MRI data with CT information has been found to be practical, and often necessary, for the three-dimensional treatment of brain neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1429103     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90727-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  19 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of imaging biomarkers. Part 3. The neuro-oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  A Shenoy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  [3-Dimensional irradiation planning in brain tumors. The advantages of the method and the clinical results].

Authors:  A L Grosu; H J Feldmann; C Albrecht; P Kneschaurek; R Wehrmann; M W Gross; F B Zimmermann; M Molls
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Effects of irradiation on tumor cell survival, invasion and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Odysseas Kargiotis; Aliki Geka; Jasti S Rao; Athanasios P Kyritsis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  What is the best way to evaluate clinical target volume for radiotherapy of brain tumors?

Authors:  Alba Fiorentino; Piernicola Pedicini; Rocchina Caivano; Vincenzo Fusco
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2013-11

5.  Radiotherapy to volumes defined by metabolic imaging in gliomas: time to abandon monstrous margins?

Authors:  Sridhar P Susheela; Swaroop Revannasiddaiah
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-02

6.  Interhemispheric Difference Images from Postoperative Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Gliomas.

Authors:  Robert Kosztyla; Stefan A Reinsberg; Vitali Moiseenko; Brian Toyota; Alan Nichol
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-10-05

7.  Effect of age-dependent bone electron density on the calculated dose distribution from kilovoltage and megavoltage photon and electron radiotherapy in paediatric MRI-only treatment planning.

Authors:  B Zeinali-Rafsanjani; R Faghihi; M A Mosleh-Shirazi; M Saeedi-Moghadam; R Jalli; S Sina
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Clinical target volume definition for glioblastoma radiotherapy planning: magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.

Authors:  A Fiorentino; R Caivano; P Pedicini; V Fusco
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Current concepts on imaging in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michela Lecchi; Piero Fossati; Federica Elisei; Roberto Orecchia; Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Comparison of T2 and FLAIR imaging for target delineation in high grade gliomas.

Authors:  Bronwyn Stall; Leor Zach; Holly Ning; John Ondos; Barbara Arora; Uma Shankavaram; Robert W Miller; Deborah Citrin; Kevin Camphausen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.