Literature DB >> 27843506

Promotion of Nickel (Ni) Allergy by Anamnestic Sensitization with a Bacterial Component, Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), in Mice.

Norimasa Adachi1, Eiji Takayama2, Makoto Adachi3, Masako Mizuno-Kamiya2, Harumi Kawaki2, Hiroko Takeuchi4, Shuri Kubo4, Hajime Ishigami5, Masakazu Kurachi5, Nobuo Kondoh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) promote allergic responses to nickel (Ni) both in the sensitization and elicitation steps. In this study, we examine the effect of pre-sensitization to LPS on the occurrence of Ni allergy using a mouse model.
METHOD: A 100 mg of LPS was injected into C57BL/6J mice intraperitoneally (ip). Three weeks later, the mice were subsequently injected with 0.3 μ moles of nickel dichloride (NiCl2) and 100 μg of CpG-DNA, which acted as an adjuvant. The mice were repeatedly immunized with the 0.3 μg of nickel sulfate (NiSO4), along with 300 μl of the adjuvant, Inject Alum (Pierce, USA). Then we examined the producing capabilities of T helper type 1 (Th1) and 2 (Th2) cytokines (interferon-gamma- (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-10, respectively) from anti CD3 antibody-stimulated spleen cells.
RESULTS: Pre-treatment with LPS, followed by repeated challenges with Ni2+ and adjuvants significantly enhanced the IFN-γ-producing capability of spleen cells (n=5, p<0.01); however, that could not enhance the capability of spleen cells by a single challenge with Ni2+ and adjuvants (n=5). In contrast, without LPS treatment, single or even repeated challenges by Ni2+ could not enhance the IFN-γ-producing capability. On the other hand, the IL-10-producing capability of spleen cells was not enhanced even by LPS and repeated challenges with Ni2+ and adjuvants.
CONCLUSION: The solitary pre-sensitization to LPS is essential for the onset of Ni allergy by shifting the Th1/Th2 immune balance toward a Th1 dominant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CpG-DNA; IFN-γ; IL-10; LPS; Ni-ion; Th1/Th2 balance

Year:  2016        PMID: 27843506      PMCID: PMC5070425          DOI: 10.2174/1874210601610010531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Dent J        ISSN: 1874-2106


INTRODUCTION

Metal allergies caused by exposure to sensitizing metals including nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), palladium (Pd), and gold (Au) are well known [1]. Among them, Ni is the most common cause of metal-induced allergies in prosthodontic treatment [2, 3]. Allergic reactions induced by metals are, in general, classified as Type IV [1]. Based on cytokine production, two murine CD4 cell subsets, Th1 and Th2, are defined [4]. Th1 cells produce IL-2 and IFN-γ, while Th2 cells are characterized by their ability to produce IL-4 and IL-10 [5]. Th1/Th2 imbalance has been observed in acute or chronic infections, cancer, asthma, and other allergies [6-10]. The type IV allergy, delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH), is mainly regulated by Th1 cytokines [11]. However, the action mechanisms of Ni are pleiotropic. Ni exposure can also elicit Type I hypersensitivity [12] mediated by Th2 cells. Ni hypersensitivity is also evoked by hapten-mediated allergic reactions [13], and at the other extreme, Ni can directly bind to Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 to sufficiently induce nickel sensitization [14]. Unlike typical ACD, the murine equivalent model virtually depends on cytotoxic T cells [15]. Interestingly, the Ni allergy can occur even in T-cell-deficient nude mice [16]. In addition to Ni, the bacterial environment is an important factor in the development of metal allergies [16]. LPS, the component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, promotes allergic responses of Ni at both the sensitization and elicitation steps [17]. However, in these experiments, the effects of simultaneously injecting LPS as an adjuvant with Ni may not recreate the essential conditions associated with the anamnestic history of inflammation adjoining periodontitis. In order to examine the pre-existing condition of LPS upon Ni allergy, we investigated the effects of anamnestic pre-treatment of LPS by evaluating the cytokine-producing capability of stimulated spleen cells from immunized mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

C57BL/6J mice (4 weeks old males) were purchased from SLC (JAPAN), and then acclimatized in our animal facility for 2 weeks.

Sensitization to Ni

At 6 weeks old, the mice's intra peritoneal cavities (IP) were injected with 100 µg of LPS (L8274, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in a 200 µl physiological phosphate buffer saline (PBS). After the 3rd week, the mice (9 weeks old) were primarily immunized IP with the nickel (Ni) ion solution containing 0.3 µmoles of nickel NiCl2 and a 100 µg adjuvant of CpG-DNA (5’-TCC ATG ACG TTC CTG ACG TT-3’) [18, 19] in 600 µl of PBS. After 3 more weeks, the mice 12 weeks old were repeatedly immunized IP with the Ni ion solution containing 0.3 µg of nickel sulfate (NiSO4) in a 300 µg adjuvant of Inject Alum (Pierce, USA) in a 300 µl of PBS. Last, after an additional 3 weeks, spleen cells were extracted from the mice, now 15-weeks old, to determine their cytokine-producing capabilities.

Cytokine-producing Capabilities of Spleen Cells

We previously described the method for determination of cytokine-producing capabilities of murine spleen cells [20]. Briefly, 10 µg/ml of anti-CD3ε monoclonal antibody (mAb)(145-2C11) [21] in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was immobilized (100 μl/well) on a 96-well tissue culture plate (3599, Corning, NY) at 4 oC for 4 hours. In order to remove red blood cells, isolated spleen cells were treated with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.3) containing 140 mM ammonium chloride and 1 mM Na2EDTA. Before the supernatants were harvested, the cells (4 x 105 /well) were cultivated on the 96-well tissue culture plate coated with anti-CD3ε mAb for 48 hours under 5% CO2, in 200 µl of RPMI-1640 (R8758, Sigma-Aldrich, MO) containing 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 250 ng/ml amphotericin B, and supplemented with a 10% fetal calf serum (Invitorogen, CA).

ELISA to Determine Concentrations of Produced Cytokines

Concentrations of IFN-γ and interleukin-10 (IL-10) produced by the spleen cells were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with BD OptiEIA Set (Phermingen, CA) as described [20].

Statistics

All analyses were performed using Stat View Ver 5.0 software (SAS, NC). The data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). Student’s t-test was applied to determine the significance of differences between the two groups. P values less than 0.01 were considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Effects of Anamnestic Treatment with LPS on IFN-γ-producing Capability

We examined the effects of anamnestic pre-treatment with LPS on the induction of Ni-allergy. After 3 weeks of either LPS injection or a control injection of PBS, mice (6 weeks old) were immunized with the NiCl2 or with an adjuvant alone. After 3 more weeks, the Th1 cytokine IFN-γ-producing capability of anti-CD3ε-stimulated spleen cells was examined (Fig. and Table ). The IFN-γ-producing capability was significantly more attenuated in the NiCl2-injected mice than in the control group, regardless of LPS pre-treatments. The same series of mice were repeatedly immunized with NiSO4. After three more weeks, the induced IFN-γ-production of spleen cells was significantly higher in the mice which were pre-treated with LPS and injected twice with Ni, than in those sensitized with a single Ni injection. By contrast, without LPS treatment, the IFN-γ-producing capability was somewhat attenuated after the repeated Ni injections (Fig. and Table ).

Effects of Anamnestic Treatment with LPS on IL-10-producing Capability

Next, we examined the production of a Th2 cytokine, IL-10, in the same series of experiments. The IL-10-producing capability in LPS-untreated mice was attenuated by repeating the Ni injection (Fig. and Table ). In LPS-pretreated mice, the producing capability of IL-10 was unaffected even by repeating Ni injections (Fig. and Table ).

Effects of LPS and Ni on the Ratio of Th1/ Th2 Cytokines

An index of the Th1/ Th2 balance was calculated by dividing the level of the IFN-γ-producing capability with the level of the IL-10-producing capability. The index of the Th1/Th2 balances of mice with the anamnestic LPS-sensitization was shifted to the Th2 by the Ni-ion-immunization only once, while that of the mice without the LPS pre-treatment was not changed (Fig. ). On the other hand, the Th1/Th2 balance with the LPS pre-treatment was significantly shifted to the Th1 by the two Ni injections (Fig. ).

DISCUSSION

In this report, we showed first that anamnestic pre-treatment by LPS even predated 3 weeks effectively enhanced Ni allergy. However, we also revealed that a single treatment by Ni after the pre-treatment of LPS or repeated treatments by Ni without LPS treatment rather reduced the IFN-γ-production of spleen cells. Ni or Ni compounds conferred toxicological effects on the immune system [22]. Several immune cells including T lymphocytes are susceptible to Ni [23]. Dietary intake of NiCl2 is rerated to reduce cytokine expression of intestinal mucosa [24]. Therefore, the reduced IFN-γ-production in our observation may be caused by the toxicity of Ni. Allergic reaction may confer IFN-γ-producing capability by surpassing the toxicological effects of Ni. LPS stimulates innate immunity via TLR 4 or 2, modifies adaptive immunity [25, 26], and also activates dendritic cells [27]. As already mentioned, Ni can also bind to TLR4 to induce nickel sensitization [14]. Our results may demonstrate that the accumulated immune memory by LPS shares a common pathway with the action mechanism of Ni, and also suggest that not only a present illness but also an anamnestic history of oral infectious disease could cause Ni hypersensitivity.
Table 1

IFN-γ-producing capabilities of spleen cells from LPS and/or Ni pre-treated mice.

LPS NiCl2 NiSO4 #Mean ± SD *P<
--201.8±4.90.0001
-+152.7±5.9
+-142.9±4.50.0001
++109.8±2.8
--+126.6±4.50.01
-++108.6±2.3
+-+124.4±4.40.001
+++183.0±8.4

#The mean (ng/ml) ± standard deviation (n=5).

*Student’s t-test, NiCl2 innoculated (+) vs. uninnoculated (-).

Table 2

IL-10-producing capabilities of spleen cells from LPS and/or Ni pre-treated mice.

LPS NiCl2 NiSO4 #Mean ± SD *P <
--7.29±0.150.01
-+5.57±0.11
+-5.07±0.100.06
++5.83±0.12
--+6.28±0.340.01
-++4.92±0.23
+-+6.95±0.190.17
+++6.73±0.15

#The mean (ng/ml) ± standard deviation (n=5).

*Student’s t-test, NiCl2 innoculated (+) vs. uninnoculated (-).

  27 in total

1.  How nickel turns on innate immune cells.

Authors:  Ben Roediger; Wolfgang Weninger
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 5.126

Review 2.  TH1 and TH2 cells: different patterns of lymphokine secretion lead to different functional properties.

Authors:  T R Mosmann; R L Coffman
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 28.527

Review 3.  Dental allergic contact dermatitis: an interesting case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Carly Kirshen; Melanie Pratt
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.845

4.  Mouse CD8+ CD122+ T cells with intermediate TCR increasing with age provide a source of early IFN-gamma production.

Authors:  E Takayama; S Seki; T Ohkawa; K Ami; Y Habu; T Yamaguchi; T Tadakuma; H Hiraide
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  SerpinB2 deficiency modulates Th1⁄Th2 responses after schistosome infection.

Authors:  W A Schroder; J Gardner; T T Le; M Duke; M L Burke; M K Jones; D P McManus; A Suhrbier
Journal:  Parasite Immunol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.280

Review 6.  Nickel allergies: paying the Toll for innate immunity.

Authors:  Marc Schmidt; Matthias Goebeler
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 7.  The many faces of nickel allergy.

Authors:  Razvigor Darlenski; Jana Kazandjieva; Kyrill Pramatarov
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.736

8.  Allergy-inducing nickel concentration is lowered by lipopolysaccharide at both the sensitization and elicitation steps in a murine model.

Authors:  M Kinbara; N Sato; T Kuroishi; T Takano-Yamamoto; S Sugawara; Y Endo
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Immune effects of nickel.

Authors:  F Salsano; C Francia; I Roumpedaki; M Proietti; S Pisarri; N Verna; E Gabriele; G Di Gioacchino; M Di Gioacchino
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2004 May-Aug       Impact factor: 3.219

10.  Toxicological effects of nickel chloride on IgA+ B Cells and sIgA, IgA, IgG, IgM in the intestinal mucosal immunity in broilers.

Authors:  Bangyuan Wu; Hengmin Cui; Xi Peng; Jing Fang; Zhicai Zuo; Junliang Deng; Jianying Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.