Literature DB >> 27842295

Asymmetry between lower limbs during rested and fatigued state running gait in healthy individuals.

Kara N Radzak1, Ashley M Putnam2, Kaori Tamura2, Ronald K Hetzler2, Christopher D Stickley2.   

Abstract

Although normal gait is often considered symmetrical in healthy populations, differences between limbs during walking suggest that limbs may be used preferentially for braking or propulsion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate kinematic and kinetic variables, at both rested state and following a two-stage treadmill fatiguing run, for asymmetry between limbs. Kinematic (240Hz) and kinetic (960Hz) running data were collected bilaterally for 20 physically active individuals at both rested and fatigued states. Symmetry angles were calculated to quantify asymmetry magnitude at rested and fatigued states. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate differences between right and left limbs at rested and fatigued states, as well as rested and fatigued states symmetry angles. Variables that have been previously associated with the development of overuse injuries, such as knee internal rotation, knee stiffness, loading rate, and adduction free moment, were found to be significantly different between limbs at both rested and fatigued states. Significant differences in vertical stiffness were found, potentially indicating functional asymmetry during running. Symmetry angle was used to investigate changes in percentage of asymmetry at rested and fatigued states. Small (1-6%), but significant decreases in vertical stiffness, loading rate, and free moment symmetry angles indicate that these variables may become more symmetrical with fatigue. Knee internal rotation and knee stiffness became more asymmetrical with fatigue, increasing by 14% and 5.3%, respectively. The findings of the current study indicate that fatigue induced changes in gait may progress knee movement pattern asymmetry. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymmetry; Fatigue; Running; Symmetry; Vertical stiffness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27842295     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  19 in total

1.  The Utility of Objective Strength and Functional Performance to Predict Subjective Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Heather Menzer; Lindsay V Slater; David Diduch; Mark Miller; Grant Norte; John Goetschius; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-12-18

2.  Relationships and Predictive Capabilities of Jump Assessments to Soccer-Specific Field Test Performance in Division I Collegiate Players.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; Alyssa A Stage; John J Stokes; Ashley J Orjalo; DeShaun L Davis; Dominic V Giuliano; Matthew R Moreno; Fabrice G Risso; Adrina Lazar; Samantha A Birmingham-Babauta; Tricia M Tomita
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-03

3.  Motion Sensors-Based Machine Learning Approach for the Identification of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Gait Patterns in On-the-Field Activities in Rugby Players.

Authors:  Salvatore Tedesco; Colum Crowe; Andrew Ryan; Marco Sica; Sebastian Scheurer; Amanda M Clifford; Kenneth N Brown; Brendan O'Flynn
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Effects of anti-pronation shoes on lower limb kinematics and kinetics in female runners with pronated feet: The role of physical fatigue.

Authors:  AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero; Seyed Majid Alavi-Mehr; Urs Granacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Agreement between the spatiotemporal gait parameters from two different wearable devices and high-speed video analysis.

Authors:  Felipe García-Pinillos; Pedro Á Latorre-Román; Víctor M Soto-Hermoso; Juan A Párraga-Montilla; Antonio Pantoja-Vallejo; Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo; Luis E Roche-Seruendo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Testing the Performance of an Innovative Markerless Technique for Quantitative and Qualitative Gait Analysis.

Authors:  Laura Simoni; Alessandra Scarton; Filippo Gerli; Claudio Macchi; Federico Gori; Guido Pasquini; Silvia Pogliaghi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Towards Machine Learning-Based Detection of Running-Induced Fatigue in Real-World Scenarios: Evaluation of IMU Sensor Configurations to Reduce Intrusiveness.

Authors:  Luca Marotta; Jaap H Buurke; Bert-Jan F van Beijnum; Jasper Reenalda
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  IMU-Based Effects Assessment of the Use of Foot Orthoses in the Stance Phase during Running and Asymmetry between Extremities.

Authors:  Juan Luis Florenciano Restoy; Jordi Solé-Casals; Xantal Borràs-Boix
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Leg dominance as a risk factor for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Matthew T Philippi; Timothy L Kahn; Temitope F Adeyemi; Travis G Maak; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2020-02-13

10.  Agreement Between Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Measured by a Markerless Motion Capture System and Two Reference Systems-a Treadmill-Based Photoelectric Cell and High-Speed Video Analyses: Comparative Study.

Authors:  Felipe García-Pinillos; Diego Jaén-Carrillo; Victor Soto Hermoso; Pedro Latorre Román; Pedro Delgado; Antonio Carton; Cristian Martinez; Luis Roche Seruendo
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.