Literature DB >> 27841822

Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine in Patients with Vasoplegic Shock after Cardiac Surgery: The VANCS Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar1, Jean Louis Vincent, Filomena Regina Barbosa Gomes Galas, Andrew Rhodes, Giovanni Landoni, Eduardo Atsushi Osawa, Renato Rosa Melo, Marcia Rodrigues Sundin, Solimar Miranda Grande, Fabio A Gaiotto, Pablo Maria Pomerantzeff, Luis Oliveira Dallan, Rafael Alves Franco, Rosana Ely Nakamura, Luiz Augusto Lisboa, Juliano Pinheiro de Almeida, Aline Muller Gerent, Dayenne Hianae Souza, Maria Alice Gaiane, Julia Tizue Fukushima, Clarice Lee Park, Cristiane Zambolim, Graziela Santos Rocha Ferreira, Tânia Mara Strabelli, Felipe Lourenco Fernandes, Ligia Camara, Suely Zeferino, Valter Garcia Santos, Marilde Albuquerque Piccioni, Fabio Biscegli Jatene, Jose Otavio Costa Auler, Roberto Kalil Filho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vasoplegic syndrome is a common complication after cardiac surgery and impacts negatively on patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether vasopressin is superior to norepinephrine in reducing postoperative complications in patients with vasoplegic syndrome.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted at the Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, between January 2012 and March 2014. Patients with vasoplegic shock (defined as mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg resistant to fluid challenge and cardiac index greater than 2.2 l · min · m) after cardiac surgery were randomized to receive vasopressin (0.01 to 0.06 U/min) or norepinephrine (10 to 60 μg/min) to maintain arterial pressure. The primary endpoint was a composite of mortality or severe complications (stroke, requirement for mechanical ventilation for longer than 48 h, deep sternal wound infection, reoperation, or acute renal failure) within 30 days.
RESULTS: A total of 330 patients were randomized, and 300 were infused with one of the study drugs (vasopressin, 149; norepinephrine, 151). The primary outcome occurred in 32% of the vasopressin patients and in 49% of the norepinephrine patients (unadjusted hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.80; P = 0.0014). Regarding adverse events, the authors found a lower occurrence of atrial fibrillation in the vasopressin group (63.8% vs. 82.1%; P = 0.0004) and no difference between groups in the rates of digital ischemia, mesenteric ischemia, hyponatremia, and myocardial infarction.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results suggest that vasopressin can be used as a first-line vasopressor agent in postcardiac surgery vasoplegic shock and improves clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27841822     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  40 in total

Review 1.  A global perspective on vasoactive agents in shock.

Authors:  Djillali Annane; Lamia Ouanes-Besbes; Daniel de Backer; Bin DU; Anthony C Gordon; Glenn Hernández; Keith M Olsen; Tiffany M Osborn; Sandra Peake; James A Russell; Sergio Zanotti Cavazzoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  [S3 guidelines on intensive medical care of cardiac surgery patients : Hemodynamic monitoring and cardiovascular system-an update].

Authors:  M Habicher; T Zajonz; M Heringlake; A Böning; S Treskatsch; U Schirmer; A Markewitz; M Sander
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Vasopressor therapy in critically ill patients with shock.

Authors:  James A Russell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Complications Associated With Mortality in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Authors:  Robert E Freundlich; Michael D Maile; Joseph J Sferra; Elizabeth S Jewell; Sachin Kheterpal; Milo Engoren
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Enhanced coronary arteriolar contraction to vasopressin in patients with diabetes after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas Sellke; Alex Kuczmarski; Isabella Lawandy; Victoria L Cole; Afshin Ehsan; Arun K Singh; Yuhong Liu; Frank W Sellke; Jun Feng
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Perioperative Clinical Trials in AKI.

Authors:  David R McIlroy; Marcos G Lopez; Frederic T Billings
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.299

7.  Sudden cardiac arrest in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with dynamic cavity obstruction: The case for a decatecholaminisation strategy.

Authors:  Cosmin Balan; Adrian View-Kim Wong
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2017-10-09

Review 8.  Vasoplegia from Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Shyama Sathianathan; Geetha Bhat; Robert Dowling
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Association of Vasopressin Plus Catecholamine Vasopressors vs Catecholamines Alone With Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Distributive Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  William F McIntyre; Kevin J Um; Waleed Alhazzani; Alexandra P Lengyel; Ludhmila Hajjar; Anthony C Gordon; François Lamontagne; Jeff S Healey; Richard P Whitlock; Emilie P Belley-Côté
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Neuroendocrine predictors of vasoplegia after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  D Pasero; A M Berton; G Motta; R Raffaldi; G Fornaro; A Costamagna; A Toscano; C Filippini; G Mengozzi; N Prencipe; M Zavattaro; F Settanni; E Ghigo; L Brazzi; A S Benso
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.