| Literature DB >> 27840898 |
Xunliang Tong1, Miao Guo2, Min Jin2, Hao Chen2, Yanming Li3, Ji-Fu Wei2.
Abstract
Cockroach (CR) allergies caused by the American cockroach hyave been recognized to be repsonsible for IgE-mediated type I hypersensitivity worldwide. Per a 10 is one of the recognized main allergens of the American CR. In a previous study, we examined another American CR allergen, Per a 9 in patients with CR allergies and examined epitope sequences in this allergen. In the present study, we aimed to examine epitope sequences in the Per a 10 allergen. for this purpose, the Per a 10 gene was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli) systems. Our results revealed that 9 out of 16 (56.3%) sera from patients with American CR allergies reacted to Per a10, as assessed by ELISA, confirming that Per a 10 is a major allergen of the American CR. Our results also revealed that the expression of CD63 and CCR3 on passively sensitized basophils (obtained sera of patients with American CR allergies) was increased by approximately 2.3-fold, indicating that recombinant Per a 10 is functionally active. In addition, 3 immunoinformatics tools, namely the DNAStar Protean system, the Bioinformatics Predicted Antigenic Peptides (BPAP) system and the BepiPred 1.0 server were used to predict the peptides and the results revealed 8 peptides (2-12, 55-67, 98-120, 125-133, 149-160, 170-182, 201-208 and 223-227) as potential B cell epitopes of the Per a 10 allergen. Moreover, Per a 10 was predicted to have 3 T cell epitope sequences, namely 83-92, 139-147 and 162-170. The findings of our study on the CR allergen may prove to be useful in the development of peptide-based vaccine for the prevention and/or treatment of CR allergies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27840898 PMCID: PMC5117736 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Med ISSN: 1107-3756 Impact factor: 4.101
Figure 1Expression and purification of Per a 10 in E. coli. (A) Per a 10 expressed at 16°C, 28°C or 37°C was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Lane M, protein makers; lane 1, the total protein of un-induced bacteria; lane 2, the total protein of bacteria induced by 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 37°C; lane 3, the supernatant of the bacteria induced by 1 mM IPTG at 37°C; lane 4, the precipitant of the bacteria induced by 1 mM IPTG at 37°C; lane 5, the total protein of bacteria induced by 1 mM IPTG at 28°C; lane 6, the supernatant of the bacterial induced by 1 mM IPTG at 28°C; lane 7, the precipitant of the bacterial induced by 1 mM IPTG at 28°C; lane 8, the total protein of bacteria induced by 1 mM IPTG at 16°C; lane 9, the supernatant of the bacteria induced by 1 mM IPTG at 16°C; lane 10, the precipitant of the bacteria induced by 1 mM IPTG at 16°C. The arrow represents Per a 10 protein. (B) The purification of Per a 10 expressed in E. coli. Lane M, protein makers; lanes 1–10, washing with 250 mM imidazole. The arrow represents Per a 10 protein.
Figure 2(A) Analysis of specific IgE reactivity of recombinant Per a 10 by direct ELISA. Sera were collected from patients with American cockroach (CR) allergies and healthy control subjects. The values shown are the mean ± SDs from triplicate experiments. (B) Western blot analysis of IgE reactivity to Per a 10 sera from patients with American CR allergies. Lanes 1–3, Per a 10 reacted with the serum from patients 3, 8 and 14, respectively; lanes 4–5, Per a 10 reacted with serum from control subjects 1 and 2, respectively.
Figure 3Induction of basophil activation by recombinant Per a 10. Following non-specific IgEs on basophils being stripped off, cells from each donor were passively sensitized with sera from (A) 4 different healthy subjects or (B) from 4 different patients with American cockroach (CR) allergies, and were then challenged with Per a 10 at 1.0 μg/ml. The values shown are the means ± SE for the sera from 4 different subjects. *P<0.05 in comparison with the corresponding carrier alone control.
Figure 4Phylogenetic relationship of Per a 10 allergen amino acid sequence with other homologs.
The predicated secondary structure of Per a 10.
| Secondary structural prediction methods | α-helices | β-sheets |
|---|---|---|
| PSIPRED | 147–153, 217–225 | 5–6, 15–19, 24–32, 35–39, 51–55, 58–60, 65–74, 86–92, 105–106, 117–122, 138–145, 184–187, 190–196, 208–212 |
| NetSurfP ver1.1 | 147–153, 213–225 | 14–20, 24–30, 35–42, 50–59, 65–74, 87–92, 102–106, 117–122, 138–145, 165–167, 190–196, 209–212, |
| PredictProtein | 148–151, 213–224 | 14–20, 24–32, 35–43, 51–59, 65–79, 87–92, 101–106, 117–122, 137–146, 162–168, 185–197, 209–212 |
| Overall results | 147–153, 217–225 | 14–20, 24–32, 35–39, 51–55, 58–60, 65–74, 87–92, 117–122, 137–145, 184–187, 185–196, 208–212. |
Figure 5Three-dimensional structure and validation of Per a 10 homology model. (A) The preliminary protein structure of Per a 10 homology model. (B) Ramachandran plot of the preliminary protein structure of Per a 10. (C) Validation of the preliminary protein structure of Per a 10 by the ERRAT program. (D) The optimized protein structure of Per a 10 homology model. (E) Ramachandran plot of the optimized protein structure of Per a 10. The residures in most favored regions, additional allowed regions, generously allowed regions and disallowed regions are shown in red, yellow, grey and white in the Ramachandran plot, respectively. (F) Validation of the optimized protein structure of Per a 10 by the ERRAT program.
Figure 6B cell and T cell epitope superimposition on the surface of the Per a 10 allergen structure. B1–B7 are the predicted B cell epitopes; T1–T3 are the predicted T cell epitopes.
The T cell epitope prediction of Per a 10.
| HLA types | Location of the prediction results |
|---|---|
| HLA-DR101 | 1–9, 14–22, 17–25, 18–26, 20–28, 22–30, 24–32, 25–33, 26–34, 28–36, 31–39, 35–43, 42–50, 43–51, 45–53, 53–61, 65–73, 69–77, 70–78, 72–80, 80–88, 81–89, 85–93, 87–95, 89–97, 96–104, 99–107, 102–110, 105–113, 107–115, 117–125, 136–144, 137–145, 184–192, 186–194, 187–195, 191–199, 206–214, 209–217, 210–218, 213–221 |
| HLA-DR301 | 8–16, 72–80, 81–89 |
| HLA-DR401 | 83–91, 87–105, 89–97, 136–144, 139–147, 184–192, 185–193 |
| HLA-DR501 | 18–26, 35–43, 46–54, 52–60, 83–91, 85–93, 89–97, 139–147, 209–217, 210–218 |
| HLA-DQA10101-DQB10501 | 78–86, 81–89, 184–202 |
| HLA-DQA10501-DQB10201 | 13–21, 38–46, 78–86, 80–88, 157–165 |
| HLA-DQA10301-DQB10302 | 82–90, 84–92, 90–98, 162–170 |
| HLA-DQA10401-DQB10402 | 11–19, 84–92, 162–170, 195–203 |
| HLA-DQA10102-DQB10602 | 20–28, 25–33, 26–34, 31–39, 34–42, 37–45, 43–51, 47–55, 61–69, 66–74, 67–75, 84–92, 87–95, 90–98, 97–105, 102–110, 132–140, 162–170, 165–173, 190–198, 217–225 |
| The final predicted T cell epitopes | 83–92, 139–147, 162–170 |