Literature DB >> 27840727

Crystal structure of 1,2-bis-(6-bromo-3,4-dihydro-2H-benz[e][1,3]oxazin-3-yl)ethane: a bromine-containing bis-benzoxazine.

Augusto Rivera1, Jicli José' Rojas1, Jaime Ríos-Motta1, Michael Bolte2.   

Abstract

The title benzoxazine molecule, C18H18Br2N2O2, was prepared by a Mannich-type reaction of 4-bromo-phenol with ethane-1,2-di-amine and formaldehyde. The title compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with a centre of inversion located at the mid-point of the C-C bond of the central CH2CH2 spacer. The oxazinic ring adopts a half-chair conformation. The structure is compared to those of other functionalized benzoxazines synthesized in our laboratory. In the crystal, weak C-H⋯Br and C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds stack the mol-ecules along the b-axis direction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C—H⋯Br and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds; benzoxazines; crystal structure; phenolic resins

Year:  2016        PMID: 27840727      PMCID: PMC5095852          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016016509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

In a continuation of our work on the synthesis and characterization of bis-1,3-benzoxazines, we have studied some of the chemical properties and determined the crystal structure of the title compound. Benzoxazines form an important class of benzo-fused heterocycles with a wide spectrum of biological activities. They are also emerging as desirable phenolic resin precursors because benzoxazines can undergo ring opening without emitting volatile materials during the curing process. This leads to a final cured product with excellent properties (Pilato, 2010 ▸). Normally, the incorporation of bromine can increase the flame-retarding properties and reduce the flammability of polymers (Li, et al., 2010 ▸). Recently, we have investigated the crystal structures of analogous bifunctional benzoxazines namely 3,3′-(ethane-1,2-di­yl)bis­(6-substituted-3,4-di­hydro-2H-1,3-benzoxazine) (Rivera et al., 2010 ▸, 2011 ▸, 2012a ▸,b ▸) that were prepared to investigate whether replacement of the substituents at the para position of the phenyl ring affects the electrophilic anomeric effect in the N–C–O sequence of the adjacent oxazine ring. In addition, as benzoxazine contains a tertiary nitro­gen atom, the lone-pair electrons may play an important role in the inter­action with guest mol­ecules but there are no reports on the inclusion properties of polybenzoxazines (Chirachanchai et al., 2011 ▸). An X-ray structural study may therefore provide a better understanding of the ability of benzoxazines to act as novel host–guest compounds. In our opinion, the title compound also has potential applications in the production of new bromine-containing phenolic resins.

Structural commentary

The asymmetric unit of the title compound (Fig. 1 ▸), C18H18Br2N2O2, contains one half of the organic mol­ecule, an inversion centre generates the other half of the mol­ecule (symmetry operation: 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z). The six-membered oxazine heterocyclic ring adopts a half-chair conformation, with puckering parameters Q = 0.512 (2) Å, θ =129.6 (2)°, φ = 283.6 (3)°. This ring is analysed with respect to the plane formed by O1/C3/C4/C5, with deviations of the C2 and N1 atoms from this plane of 0.300 (6) and −0.320 (4) Å, respectively.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Atoms labelled with the suffix A are generated using the symmetry operator (1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z).

The CC bond distances and angles of the aromatic rings were found to be normal. The C3—O1 bond length [1.372 (6) Å] is comparable with other previously reported C—O bond lengths for related structures [1.370 (10) and 1.388 (9) Å (Rivera et al., 2012a ▸) and 1.376 (1) Å (Rivera et al., 2011 ▸)], but is found to be shorter in the p-chloro derivative where C—O = 1.421 (2) Å (Rivera et al., 2010 ▸). Inter­estingly, the C2—N1 and C2—O1 distances, 1.450 (5) and 1.456 (6) Å, respectively, are significantly different from the corresponding distances in the p-chloro derivative [1.369 (2) and 1.529 (2) Å, respectively; Rivera et al., 2010 ▸]. Indeed, the values observed here are closer to those found in the analogous compound with no p-substituent on the aromatic ring (1.424 and 1.463 Å, respectively; Rivera et al., 2012a ▸). This may indicate that the presence of the electron-withdrawing bromine atom does not significantly affect the adjacent oxazinic ring.

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, weak C5—H5B⋯Br1 hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸) lead to the formation of inversion dimers with (12) ring motifs. These combine with the inversion symmetry of the mol­ecule to produce chains of mol­ecules along the c axis. Additional weak C2—H2B⋯O1 hydrogen bonds link these chains, stacking mol­ecules along the b-axis direction, Fig. 2 ▸.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C5—H5B⋯Br1i 0.993.043.951 (5)154
C2—H2B⋯O1ii 0.992.643.506 (6)146

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Figure 2

Packing diagram for the title compound, viewed along the b axis, with hydrogen bonds drawn as dashed lines.

Database survey

A database search yielded four comparable structures, namely 3,3′-(ethane-1,2-di­yl)bis­(6-methyl-3,4-di­hydro-2H-1,3-benzoxazine) (AXAKAM; Rivera et al., 2011 ▸), 3,3′-ethyl­enebis(3,4-di­hydro-6-chloro-2H-1,3-benzoxazine), (NUQKAM; Rivera et al., 2010 ▸), 3,3′-(ethane-1,2-di­yl)bis­(6-meth­oxy-3,4-di­hydro-2H-1,3-benzoxazine) monohydrate (QEDDOU; Rivera et al., 2012b ▸), 3,3′-(ethane-1,2-di­yl)bis­(3,4-di­hydro-2H-1,3-benzoxazine) (SAGPUN; Rivera et al., 2012a ▸). The Cl-substituted compound (NUQKAM) and the title compound are isomorphous. However, AXAKAM and SAGOUN have different space groups and in QEDDOU a solvent water mol­ecule is included in the crystal packing.

Synthesis and crystallization

An aqueous solution of formaldehyde (1.5 mL, 20 mmol) was added dropwise to a mixture of ethane-1,2-di­amine (0.34 ml, 5 mmol) and 4-bromo­phenol (1.73 g, 10 mmol) dissolved in dioxane (10 ml). The reaction mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature. Single crystals were obtained from this solution by slow evaporation of the solvent.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. All the H atoms were located in the difference electron-density map. C-bound H atoms were fixed geometrically (C—H = 0.95 or 0.99 Å) and refined using a riding-model approximation, with U iso(H) set to 1.2U eq of the parent atom.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC18H18Br2N2O2
M r 454.16
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)19.464 (2), 5.9444 (7), 17.2225 (19)
β (°)121.557 (7)
V3)1698.0 (3)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)4.79
Crystal size (mm)0.27 × 0.26 × 0.26
 
Data collection
DiffractometerSTOE IPDS II two-circle
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (X-AREA; Stoe & Cie, 2001)
T min, T max 0.905, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections3703, 1583, 1391
R int 0.078
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.607
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.056, 0.143, 1.07
No. of reflections1583
No. of parameters110
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)1.40, −1.92

Computer programs: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001 ▸), SHELXS (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸) and XP in SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016016509/sj5510sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016016509/sj5510Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016016509/sj5510Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1510085 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C18H18Br2N2O2F(000) = 904
Mr = 454.16Dx = 1.777 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 19.464 (2) ÅCell parameters from 3703 reflections
b = 5.9444 (7) Åθ = 3.6–26.0°
c = 17.2225 (19) ŵ = 4.79 mm1
β = 121.557 (7)°T = 173 K
V = 1698.0 (3) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.27 × 0.26 × 0.26 mm
STOE IPDS II two-circle diffractometer1391 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: Genix 3D IµS microfocus X-ray sourceRint = 0.078
ω scansθmax = 25.6°, θmin = 3.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (X-Area; Stoe & Cie, 2001)h = −20→23
Tmin = 0.905, Tmax = 1.000k = −7→7
3703 measured reflectionsl = −20→20
1583 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.099P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.143(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.07Δρmax = 1.40 e Å3
1583 reflectionsΔρmin = −1.92 e Å3
110 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL-2014/7 (Sheldrick 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0037 (8)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.60406 (3)−0.02845 (9)0.93353 (3)0.0226 (3)
O10.67962 (18)0.6369 (6)0.7231 (2)0.0176 (7)
N10.6072 (2)0.4166 (7)0.5842 (2)0.0130 (8)
C10.5323 (2)0.5473 (7)0.5467 (3)0.0141 (10)
H1A0.54300.70670.54010.017*
H1B0.51240.54060.58910.017*
C20.6783 (3)0.5494 (8)0.6434 (3)0.0155 (10)
H2A0.68110.67700.60820.019*
H2B0.72680.45520.66390.019*
C30.6620 (3)0.4788 (8)0.7681 (3)0.0141 (9)
C40.6259 (2)0.2721 (8)0.7288 (3)0.0142 (9)
C50.6091 (2)0.2158 (8)0.6343 (3)0.0140 (9)
H5A0.65130.11230.64000.017*
H5B0.55660.13720.59950.017*
C60.6083 (2)0.1218 (8)0.7781 (3)0.0147 (9)
H60.5841−0.01930.75260.018*
C70.6265 (3)0.1804 (8)0.8655 (3)0.0164 (9)
C80.6619 (3)0.3870 (9)0.9044 (3)0.0223 (10)
H80.67410.42480.96390.027*
C90.6787 (3)0.5348 (8)0.8552 (3)0.0192 (11)
H90.70210.67680.88070.023*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0261 (4)0.0229 (4)0.0255 (4)0.00128 (17)0.0181 (3)0.00527 (19)
O10.0161 (15)0.0160 (18)0.0166 (15)−0.0043 (12)0.0058 (13)−0.0018 (13)
N10.0078 (16)0.0135 (19)0.0148 (17)0.0005 (13)0.0039 (14)0.0003 (15)
C10.010 (2)0.013 (2)0.014 (2)0.0037 (16)0.0029 (19)−0.0009 (18)
C20.012 (2)0.016 (2)0.019 (2)−0.0051 (16)0.0081 (18)−0.0034 (18)
C30.0114 (19)0.014 (2)0.014 (2)0.0000 (15)0.0047 (17)0.0021 (17)
C40.0093 (18)0.015 (2)0.014 (2)0.0023 (16)0.0030 (15)0.0016 (17)
C50.0105 (19)0.012 (2)0.016 (2)0.0009 (15)0.0039 (16)−0.0021 (17)
C60.0098 (18)0.015 (2)0.018 (2)0.0015 (15)0.0062 (16)0.0022 (18)
C70.020 (2)0.014 (2)0.020 (2)0.0032 (16)0.0137 (18)0.0057 (18)
C80.028 (2)0.023 (3)0.017 (2)−0.001 (2)0.0126 (19)−0.0036 (19)
C90.023 (2)0.015 (2)0.019 (2)−0.0003 (17)0.011 (2)−0.0020 (18)
Br1—C71.909 (5)C3—C41.402 (6)
O1—C31.372 (6)C4—C61.393 (7)
O1—C21.455 (6)C4—C51.519 (6)
N1—C21.450 (5)C5—H5A0.9900
N1—C51.462 (6)C5—H5B0.9900
N1—C11.470 (5)C6—C71.397 (7)
C1—C1i1.538 (8)C6—H60.9500
C1—H1A0.9900C7—C81.396 (7)
C1—H1B0.9900C8—C91.373 (8)
C2—H2A0.9900C8—H80.9500
C2—H2B0.9900C9—H90.9500
C3—C91.398 (7)
C3—O1—C2113.7 (4)C6—C4—C5121.9 (4)
C2—N1—C5108.0 (3)C3—C4—C5118.9 (4)
C2—N1—C1112.6 (4)N1—C5—C4112.2 (4)
C5—N1—C1113.8 (3)N1—C5—H5A109.2
N1—C1—C1i110.2 (4)C4—C5—H5A109.2
N1—C1—H1A109.6N1—C5—H5B109.2
C1i—C1—H1A109.6C4—C5—H5B109.2
N1—C1—H1B109.6H5A—C5—H5B107.9
C1i—C1—H1B109.6C4—C6—C7119.5 (4)
H1A—C1—H1B108.1C4—C6—H6120.3
N1—C2—O1113.4 (4)C7—C6—H6120.3
N1—C2—H2A108.9C8—C7—C6121.3 (4)
O1—C2—H2A108.9C8—C7—Br1119.4 (4)
N1—C2—H2B108.9C6—C7—Br1119.2 (4)
O1—C2—H2B108.9C9—C8—C7118.9 (4)
H2A—C2—H2B107.7C9—C8—H8120.5
O1—C3—C9117.2 (4)C7—C8—H8120.5
O1—C3—C4122.5 (4)C8—C9—C3120.8 (5)
C9—C3—C4120.3 (5)C8—C9—H9119.6
C6—C4—C3119.2 (4)C3—C9—H9119.6
C2—N1—C1—C1i151.1 (5)C1—N1—C5—C4−77.1 (4)
C5—N1—C1—C1i−85.6 (6)C6—C4—C5—N1161.5 (4)
C5—N1—C2—O1−64.9 (5)C3—C4—C5—N1−20.1 (5)
C1—N1—C2—O161.6 (5)C3—C4—C6—C70.3 (6)
C3—O1—C2—N147.8 (5)C5—C4—C6—C7178.7 (4)
C2—O1—C3—C9166.5 (4)C4—C6—C7—C80.1 (7)
C2—O1—C3—C4−15.8 (5)C4—C6—C7—Br1−178.8 (3)
O1—C3—C4—C6−178.7 (4)C6—C7—C8—C90.2 (7)
C9—C3—C4—C6−1.1 (6)Br1—C7—C8—C9179.2 (4)
O1—C3—C4—C52.9 (6)C7—C8—C9—C3−1.0 (7)
C9—C3—C4—C5−179.5 (4)O1—C3—C9—C8179.2 (4)
C2—N1—C5—C448.7 (5)C4—C3—C9—C81.4 (7)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C5—H5B···Br1ii0.993.043.951 (5)154
C2—H2B···O1iii0.992.643.506 (6)146
  6 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  3,3'-Ethyl-enebis(3,4-dihydro-6-chloro-2H-1,3-benzoxazine).

Authors:  Augusto Rivera; Jicli José Rojas; Jaime Ríos-Motta; Michal Dušek; Karla Fejfarová
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-04-21

3.  3,3'-(Ethane-1,2-di-yl)bis-(6-methyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,3-benzoxazine).

Authors:  Augusto Rivera; Jairo Camacho; Jaime Ríos-Motta; Michaela Pojarová; Michal Dušek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-07-13

4.  3,3'-(Ethane-1,2-di-yl)bis-(3,4-dihydro-2H-1,3-benzoxazine).

Authors:  Augusto Rivera; Jairo Camacho; Jaime Ríos-Motta; Karla Fejfarová; Michal Dušek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-12-17

5.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  3,3'-(Ethane-1,2-diyl)bis(6-meth-oxy-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,3-benzoxazine) mono-hydrate.

Authors:  Augusto Rivera; Jairo Camacho; Jaime Ríos-Motta; Monika Kučeraková; Michal Dušek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-08-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.