Literature DB >> 27840099

Taking action on overuse: Creating the culture for change.

Michael L Parchman1, Nora B Henrikson2, Paula R Blasi2, Diana S Buist2, Robert Penfold2, Brian Austin2, Emily H Ganos3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unnecessary care contributes to high costs and places patients at risk of harm. While most providers support reducing low-value care, changing established practice patterns is difficult and requires active engagement in sustained behavioral, organizational, and cultural change. Here we describe an action-planning framework to engage providers in reducing overused services.
METHODS: The framework is informed by a comprehensive review of social science theory and literature, published reports of successful and unsuccessful efforts to reduce low-value care, and interviews with innovators of value-based care initiatives in twenty-three health care organizations across the United States. A multi-stakeholder advisory committee provided feedback on the framework and guidance on optimizing it for use in practice.
RESULTS: The framework describes four conditions necessary for change: prioritize addressing low-value care; build a culture of trust, innovation and improvement; establish shared language and purpose; and commit resources to measurements. These conditions foster productive sense-making conversations between providers, between providers and patients, and among members of the health care team about the potential for harm from overuse and reflection on current frequency of use. Through these conversations providers, patients and team members think together as a group, learn how to coordinate individual behaviors, and jointly develop possibilities for coordinated action around specific areas of overuse.
CONCLUSIONS: Organizational efforts to engage providers in value-based care focused on creating conditions for productive sense-making conversations that lead to change. IMPLICATIONS: Organizations can use this framework to enhance and strengthen provider engagement efforts to do less of what potentially harms and more of what truly helps patients.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27840099     DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc (Amst)        ISSN: 2213-0764


  11 in total

1.  Why Do Physicians Pursue Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings? A National Survey.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Arabella L Simpkin; Carrie H Colla; Arlene Weissman; Alexander J Mainor; Meredith B Rosenthal; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Competency analysis and educational strategies to meet the demand for a learning health system workforce.

Authors:  Sue S Feldman; Ashleigh Allgood; Allyson G Hall; Christy Harris Lemak; Eta S Berner
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 3.  2021 Update on Pediatric Overuse.

Authors:  Nathan M Money; Alan R Schroeder; Ricardo A Quinonez; Timmy Ho; Jennifer R Marin; Elizabeth R Wolf; Daniel J Morgan; Sanket S Dhruva; Eric R Coon
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  How the dual process model of human cognition can inform efforts to de-implement ineffective and harmful clinical practices: A preliminary model of unlearning and substitution.

Authors:  Christian D Helfrich; Adam J Rose; Christine W Hartmann; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Ian D Graham; Suzanne J Wood; Barbara R Majerczyk; Chester B Good; Leonard M Pogach; Sherry L Ball; David H Au; David C Aron
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  De-implementing wisely: developing the evidence base to reduce low-value care.

Authors:  Jeremy M Grimshaw; Andrea M Patey; Kyle R Kirkham; Amanda Hall; Shawn K Dowling; Nicolas Rodondi; Moriah Ellen; Tijn Kool; Simone A van Dulmen; Eve A Kerr; Stefanie Linklater; Wendy Levinson; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 6.  Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Hanna Augustsson; Sara Ingvarsson; Per Nilsen; Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz; Irene Muli; Jessica Dervish; Henna Hasson
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-02-04

7.  Behavioral and Psychological Aspects of the Physician Experience with Deimplementation.

Authors:  Corrie E McDaniel; Samantha A House; Shawn L Ralston
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2022-01-21

8.  Peer-pressure and overuse: The effect of a multimodal approach on variation in benzodiazepine prescriptions in a network of public hospitals.

Authors:  Rosaria Del Giorno; Andrea Ottini; Angela Greco; Kevyn Stefanelli; Florenc Kola; Luca Clivio; Alessandro Ceschi; Luca Gabutti
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Overuse of diagnostic testing in healthcare: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joris L J M Müskens; Rudolf Bertijn Kool; Simone A van Dulmen; Gert P Westert
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Repeated cross-sectional analysis of hydroxychloroquine deimplementation in the AHA COVID-19 CVD Registry.

Authors:  Steven M Bradley; Sophia Emmons-Bell; R Kannan Mutharasan; Fatima Rodriguez; Divya Gupta; Gregory Roth; Ty J Gluckman; Rashmee U Shah; Tracy Y Wang; Rohan Khera; Pamela N Peterson; Sandeep Das
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.